Brexit and the Consequences

It wouldn't have shut them up but a clear referendum result to remain would have dulled their effectiveness. And of course, being democrats they would have accepted the result (of course, I don't expect you to agree with that!) – probably on a temporary basis only. But even after we "leave" the Remainers will be back won't they?

............. And you thought that Magna Carta, Henry's divorce and the Gunpowder plot were the last interesting & influential events in English politics :LOL:



Farage is on tape with Sky saying his battle would continue even if they lost.

Be naive to think otherwise.

I feel we need to take back control from the Eurosceptics who are mashing up the Magna Carta, Parliament and UK Judiciary in their personal drive for notoriety.

Do you feel Parliament is in control of anything right now?


Tail wagging dog.


Even if 48 letters received highly probable TM will receive her 159 so Tories get to remain in power.


Farage is getting bored at LBC... :LOL:
The former Ukip leader has said he sees no alternative other than making a return to frontline politics after becoming increasingly frustrated at the direction negotiations have taken. The 54-year-old said he had not yet decided whether he would return to the Ukip fold, or launch a new party of his own. But he explained: “If I have to step back into the fray and do it all again I shall.
 
I think that document shows (as you succinctly summarise above) what a rotten deal is being proposed.

The 585 page document is dense EU-speak legalese designed to ensure that any ordinary person can't understand it and would lose the will after a couple of dozen pages as I did. The ERG have done us a great favour with their "translation" – and it only needed 7 pages. Sir Humphrey and his mates really do know how to make things difficult when they get the go-ahead from their political "masters".


LOL Even with 7 pages he makes a pigs dinner of it. Does he know and understand what on earth his proposing or talking about. One twits summary and you are satisfied.

Contradictory, non-deliverable explanations and you lap it up. Sums up the referendum really.

You Brexiteers can have and get whatever promises made to you coz those lads leading the cavalry charge know their destination. :sleep:
 
40 Reasons Why It's a Duff Deal

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/...-the-small-print-of-theresa-mays-brexit-deal/


1. From the offset, we should note that this is an EU text, not a UK or international text. This has one source. The Brexit agreement is written in Brussels.

2. May says her deal means the UK leaves the EU next March. The Withdrawal Agreement makes a mockery of this. “All references to Member States and competent authorities of Member States…shall be read as including the United Kingdom.” (Art 6). Not quite what most people understand by Brexit. It goes on to spell out that the UK will be in the EU but without any MEPs, a commissioner or ECJ judges. We are effectively a Member State, but we are excused – or, more accurately, excluded – from attending summits. (Article 7)

3. The European Court of Justice is decreed to be our highest court, governing the entire Agreement – Art. 4. stipulates that both citizens and resident companies can use it. Art 4.2 orders our courts to recognise this. “If the European Commission considers that the United Kingdom has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaties or under Part Four of this Agreement before the end of the transition period, the European Commission may, within 4 years after the end of the transition period, bring the matter before the Court of Justice of the European Union”. (Art. 87)

4. The jurisdiction of the ECJ will last until eight years after the end of the transition period. (Article 158).

5. The UK will still be bound by any future changes to EU law in which it will have no say, not to mention having to comply with current law. (Article 6(2))

6. Any disputes under the Agreement will be decided by EU law only – one of the most dangerous provisions. (Article 168). This cuts the UK off from International Law, something we’d never do with any foreign body. Arbitration will be governed by the existing procedural rules of the EU law – this is not arbitration as we would commonly understand it (i.e. between two independent parties). (Article 174)

7. “UNDERLINING that this Agreement is founded on an overall balance of benefits, rights and obligations for the Union and the United Kingdom” No, it should be based upon the binding legal obligations upon the EU contained within Article 50. It is wrong to suggest otherwise.

8. The tampon tax clause: We obey EU laws on VAT, with no chance of losing the tampon tax even if we agree a better deal in December 2020 because we hereby agree to obey other EU VAT rules for **five years** after the transition period. Current EU rules prohibit 0-rated VAT on products (like tampons) that did not have such exemptions before the country joined the EU.

9. Several problems with the EU’s definitions: “Union law” is too widely defined and “United Kingdom national” is defined by the Lisbon Treaty: we should given away our right to define our citizens. The “goods” and the term “services” we are promised the deal are not defined – or, rather, will be defined however the EU wishes them to be. Thus far, this a non-defined term so far. This agreement fails to define it.

10. The Mandelson Pension Clause: The UK must promise never to tax former EU officials based here – such as Peter Mandelson or Neil Kinnock – on their E.U. pensions, or tax any current Brussels bureaucrats on their salaries. The EU and its employees are to be immune to our tax laws. (Article 104)

11. Furthermore, the UK agrees not to prosecute EU employees who are, or who might be deemed in future, criminals (Art.101)

12. The GDPR clause. The General Data Protection Regulation – the EU’s stupidest law ever? – is to be bound into UK law (Articles 71 to 73). There had been an expectation in some quarters that the UK could get out of it.

13. The UK establishes a ‘Joint Committee’ with EU representatives to guarantee ‘the implementation and application of this Agreement’. This does not sound like a withdrawal agreement – if it was, why would it need to be subject to continued monitoring? (Article 164). This Joint Committee will have subcommittees with jurisdiction over: (a) citizens’ rights; (b) “other separation provisions”; (c) Ireland/Northern Ireland; (d) Sovereign Base Areas in Cyprus; (e) Gibraltar; and (f) financial provisions. (Article 165)

14. The Lifetime clause: the agreement will last as long as the country’s youngest baby lives. “the persons covered by this Part shall enjoy the rights provided for in the relevant Titles of this Part for their lifetime”. (Article 39).

15. The UK is shut out of all EU networks and databases for security – yet no such provision exists to shut the EU out of ours. (Article 8)

16. The UK will tied to EU foreign policy, “bound by the obligations stemming from the international agreements concluded by the Union” but unable to influence such decisions. (Article 124)

17. All EU citizens must be given permanent right of residence after five years – but what counts as residence? This will be decided by the EU, rather than UK rules. (Articles 15-16)

18. Britain is granted the power to send a civil servant to Brussels to watch them pass stupid laws which will hurt our economy. (Article 34)

19. The UK agrees to spend taxpayers’ money telling everyone how wonderful the agreement is. (Article 37)

20. Art 40 defines Goods. It seems to includes Services and Agriculture. We may come to discover that actually ‘goods’ means everything.

21. Articles 40-49 practically mandate the UK’s ongoing membership of the Customs Union in all but name.

22. The UK will be charged to receive the data/information we need in order to comply with EU law. (Article 50)

23. The EU will continue to set rules for UK intellectual property law (Article 54 to 61)

24. The UK will effectively be bound by a non-disclosure agreement swearing us to secrecy regarding any EU developments we have paid to be part. This is not mutual. The EU is not bound by such measures. (Article 74)

25. The UK is bound by EU rules on procurement rules – which effectively forbids us from seeking better deals elsewhere. (Articles 75 to 78)

26. We give up all rights to any data the EU made with our money (Art. 103)

27. The EU decide capital projects (too broadly defined) the UK is liable for. (Art. 144)

28. The UK is bound by EU state aid laws until future agreement – even in the event of an agreement, this must wait four years to be valid. (Article 93)

29. Similar advantages and immunities are extended to all former MEPs and to former EU official more generally. (Articles 106-116)

30. The UK is forbidden from revealing anything the EU told us or tells us about the finer points of deal and its operation. (Article 105).

31. Any powers the UK parliament might have had to mitigate EU law are officially removed. (Article 128)

32. The UK shall be liable for any “outstanding commitments” after 2022 (Article 142(2) expressly mentions pensions, which gives us an idea as to who probably negotiated this). The amount owed will be calculated by the EU. (Articles 140-142)

33. The UK will be liable for future EU lending. As anyone familiar with the EU’s financials knows, this is not good. (Article143)

34. The UK will remain liable for capital projects approved by the European Investment Bank. (Article 150).

35. The UK will remain a ‘party’ (i.e. cough up money) for the European Development Fund. (Articles 152-154)

36. And the EU continues to calculate how much money the UK should pay it. So thank goodness Brussels does not have any accountancy issues.

37. The UK will remain bound (i.e coughing up money) to the European Union Emergency Trust Fund – which deals with irregular migration (i.e. refugees) and displaced persons heading to Europe. (Article 155)

38. The agreement will be policed by ‘the Authority’ – a new UK-based body with ‘powers equivalent to those of the European Commission’. (Article 159)

39. The EU admits, in Art. 184, that it is in breach of Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty which oblige it to “conclude an agreement” of the terms of UK leaving the EU. We must now, it seems, “negotiate expeditiously the agreements governing their future relationship.” And if the EU does not? We settle down to this Agreement.

40. And, of course, the UK will agree to pay £40bn to receive all of these ‘privileges’. (Article 138)

________________________________________
 
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/...-the-small-print-of-theresa-mays-brexit-deal/





1.From the offset, we should note that this is an EU text, not a UK or international text. This has one source. The Brexit agreement is written in Brussels.



2.May says her deal means the UK leaves the EU next March. The Withdrawal Agreement makes a mockery of this. “All references to Member States and competent authorities of Member States…shall be read as including the United Kingdom.” (Art 6). Not quite what most people understand by Brexit. It goes on to spell out that the UK will be in the EU but without any MEPs, a commissioner or ECJ judges. We are effectively a Member State, but we are excused – or, more accurately, excluded – from attending summits. (Article 7)



3.The European Court of Justice is decreed to be our highest court, governing the entire Agreement – Art. 4. stipulates that both citizens and resident companies can use it. Art 4.2 orders our courts to recognise this. “If the European Commission considers that the United Kingdom has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaties or under Part Four of this Agreement before the end of the transition period, the European Commission may, within 4 years after the end of the transition period, bring the matter before the Court of Justice of the European Union”. (Art. 87)



4.The jurisdiction of the ECJ will last until eight years after the end of the transition period. (Article 158).



5.The UK will still be bound by any future changes to EU law in which it will have no say, not to mention having to comply with current law. (Article 6(2))



6.Any disputes under the Agreement will be decided by EU law only – one of the most dangerous provisions. (Article 168). This cuts the UK off from International Law, something we’d never do with any foreign body. Arbitration will be governed by the existing procedural rules of the EU law – this is not arbitration as we would commonly understand it (i.e. between two independent parties). (Article 174)



7.“UNDERLINING that this Agreement is founded on an overall balance of benefits, rights and obligations for the Union and the United Kingdom” No, it should be based upon the binding legal obligations upon the EU contained within Article 50. It is wrong to suggest otherwise.



8.The tampon tax clause: We obey EU laws on VAT, with no chance of losing the tampon tax even if we agree a better deal in December 2020 because we hereby agree to obey other EU VAT rules for **five years** after the transition period. Current EU rules prohibit 0-rated VAT on products (like tampons) that did not have such exemptions before the country joined the EU.



9.Several problems with the EU’s definitions: “Union law” is too widely defined and “United Kingdom national” is defined by the Lisbon Treaty: we should given away our right to define our citizens. The “goods” and the term “services” we are promised the deal are not defined – or, rather, will be defined however the EU wishes them to be. Thus far, this a non-defined term so far. This agreement fails to define it.



10.The Mandelson Pension Clause: The UK must promise never to tax former EU officials based here – such as Peter Mandelson or Neil Kinnock – on their E.U. pensions, or tax any current Brussels bureaucrats on their salaries. The EU and its employees are to be immune to our tax laws. (Article 104)



11.Furthermore, the UK agrees not to prosecute EU employees who are, or who might be deemed in future, criminals (Art.101)



12.The GDPR clause. The General Data Protection Regulation – the EU’s stupidest law ever? – is to be bound into UK law (Articles 71 to 73). There had been an expectation in some quarters that the UK could get out of it.



13.The UK establishes a ‘Joint Committee’ with EU representatives to guarantee ‘the implementation and application of this Agreement’. This does not sound like a withdrawal agreement – if it was, why would it need to be subject to continued monitoring? (Article 164). This Joint Committee will have subcommittees with jurisdiction over: (a) citizens’ rights; (b) “other separation provisions”; (c) Ireland/Northern Ireland; (d) Sovereign Base Areas in Cyprus; (e) Gibraltar; and (f) financial provisions. (Article 165)



14.The Lifetime clause: the agreement will last as long as the country’s youngest baby lives. “the persons covered by this Part shall enjoy the rights provided for in the relevant Titles of this Part for their lifetime”. (Article 39).



15.The UK is shut out of all EU networks and databases for security – yet no such provision exists to shut the EU out of ours. (Article 8)



16.The UK will tied to EU foreign policy, “bound by the obligations stemming from the international agreements concluded by the Union” but unable to influence such decisions. (Article 124)



17.All EU citizens must be given permanent right of residence after five years – but what counts as residence? This will be decided by the EU, rather than UK rules. (Articles 15-16)



18.Britain is granted the power to send a civil servant to Brussels to watch them pass stupid laws which will hurt our economy. (Article 34)



19.The UK agrees to spend taxpayers’ money telling everyone how wonderful the agreement is. (Article 37)



20.Art 40 defines Goods. It seems to includes Services and Agriculture. We may come to discover that actually ‘goods’ means everything.



21.Articles 40-49 practically mandate the UK’s ongoing membership of the Customs Union in all but name.



22.The UK will be charged to receive the data/information we need in order to comply with EU law. (Article 50)



23.The EU will continue to set rules for UK intellectual property law (Article 54 to 61)



24.The UK will effectively be bound by a non-disclosure agreement swearing us to secrecy regarding any EU developments we have paid to be part. This is not mutual. The EU is not bound by such measures. (Article 74)



25.The UK is bound by EU rules on procurement rules – which effectively forbids us from seeking better deals elsewhere. (Articles 75 to 78)



26.We give up all rights to any data the EU made with our money (Art. 103)



27.The EU decide capital projects (too broadly defined) the UK is liable for. (Art. 144)



28.The UK is bound by EU state aid laws until future agreement – even in the event of an agreement, this must wait four years to be valid. (Article 93)



29.Similar advantages and immunities are extended to all former MEPs and to former EU official more generally. (Articles 106-116)



30.The UK is forbidden from revealing anything the EU told us or tells us about the finer points of deal and its operation. (Article 105).



31.Any powers the UK parliament might have had to mitigate EU law are officially removed. (Article 128)



32.The UK shall be liable for any “outstanding commitments” after 2022 (Article 142(2) expressly mentions pensions, which gives us an idea as to who probably negotiated this). The amount owed will be calculated by the EU. (Articles 140-142)



33.The UK will be liable for future EU lending. As anyone familiar with the EU’s financials knows, this is not good. (Article143)



34.The UK will remain liable for capital projects approved by the European Investment Bank. (Article 150).



35.The UK will remain a ‘party’ (i.e. cough up money) for the European Development Fund. (Articles 152-154)



36.And the EU continues to calculate how much money the UK should pay it. So thank goodness Brussels does not have any accountancy issues.



37.The UK will remain bound (i.e coughing up money) to the European Union Emergency Trust Fund – which deals with irregular migration (i.e. refugees) and displaced persons heading to Europe. (Article 155)



38.The agreement will be policed by ‘the Authority’ – a new UK-based body with ‘powers equivalent to those of the European Commission’. (Article 159)



39.The EU admits, in Art. 184, that it is in breach of Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty which oblige it to “conclude an agreement” of the terms of UK leaving the EU. We must now, it seems, “negotiate expeditiously the agreements governing their future relationship.” And if the EU does not? We settle down to this Agreement.



40.And, of course, the UK will agree to pay £40bn to receive all of these ‘privileges’. (Article 138)



________________________________________



A slightly miscalculated deal or an excellent deal?
 
The question is why should it allow for UK to pick and choose and how would those rules which are in contradiction be managed. It really is farcical. It's a bit like marriage. UK wants to remain wedded to the EU, whilst it goes around sleeping with any other partner as well as the EU it desires. Not happening!



This point is what I have thought incredible, right from the start. In fact, those who cannot see that this is absolutely unreasonable are not going to agree to anything.
 
May rushing off to Brussels

She's spent 2+ years d1cking about wasting time then presenting us with a leave no leave deal dictated by the EU.

Now all of a sudden there's a great big rush for her to get to Brussels, as early as tomorrow. Why's that I wonder....does she not have enough trouble brewing at home. :LOL:
 
This point is what I have thought incredible, right from the start. In fact, those who cannot see that this is absolutely unreasonable are not going to agree to anything.

Brexiters are not interested in a deal which ties us in to the EU structures. Remoaners are the ones who want all this nonsense.
Brexiters are quite happy doing a trade deal and nothing more.
 
She's spent 2+ years d1cking about wasting time then presenting us with a leave no leave deal dictated by the EU.

Now all of a sudden there's a great big rush for her to get to Brussels, as early as tomorrow. Why's that I wonder....does she not have enough trouble brewing at home.:LOL:

I seem to recall that Maggie Thatcher encountered a spot of career bother when she went off to the other side of the channel while trouble was brewing at home. ;)
 
Deel catz is on de plane to bwussels to cutz a gweat deals wiv de EUz. No morz mezzin dis is de reel dingz.

If deel catz no bring gud deelz from mEUz denz de deel dogz wil hav 2 get involvz.

[emoji192][emoji190]
 
How does she explain to Brussels that her shareholders won't authorise the deal? Perhaps she could get Gina Miller to run another campaign?

All Comrade Corbyn has to do now is to keep his head down, not say anything stupid and offer her assistance in acquiring a bigger shovel for her JCB.

If it all ends up in a general election then I bet you Blair and his cronies will start a new party called "Give Back Control".

jcb2.JPG
 
For anyone interested, attached is a short synopsis of the 500+ page Brexit deal deal with the EU. I've not read the original text, so I can't vouch for its accuracy. Also, as it's published by the ERG, doubtless remainers will question whether or not it's a fair distillation of the original text!
;)
Tim.
 

Attachments

  • Your-Right-to-Know.pdf
    432 KB · Views: 67
Last edited:
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/...-the-small-print-of-theresa-mays-brexit-deal/


1. From the offset, we should note that this is an EU text, not a UK or international text. This has one source. The Brexit agreement is written in Brussels.

OMG this is sooo petty. You expect leaders and ancillary support staff of 27 countries to come to the UK to write-up the brexit deal for you?
Would you like your ar5es wiped as well whilst they work on your wish list?


2. May says her deal means the UK leaves the EU next March. The Withdrawal Agreement makes a mockery of this. “All references to Member States and competent authorities of Member States…shall be read as including the United Kingdom.” (Art 6). Not quite what most people understand by Brexit. It goes on to spell out that the UK will be in the EU but without any MEPs, a commissioner or ECJ judges. We are effectively a Member State, but we are excused – or, more accurately, excluded – from attending summits. (Article 7)

Well yes UK is leaving. You complain about rules and regulations and insist in drawing some new ones up on your way out? :LOL::LOL: Poor confused souls that brexiteers are. Make up your freaking minds.

3. The European Court of Justice is decreed to be our highest court, governing the entire Agreement – Art. 4. stipulates that both citizens and resident companies can use it. Art 4.2 orders our courts to recognise this. “If the European Commission considers that the United Kingdom has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaties or under Part Four of this Agreement before the end of the transition period, the European Commission may, within 4 years after the end of the transition period, bring the matter before the Court of Justice of the European Union”. (Art. 87)

As before central dispute resolution mechanism. What would Brexiteers like. 27 member countries to seek justice in UK courts? Who would trust Brexiteers to reach fair unbiased decision? Comical. :LOL: Not happening.

4. The jurisdiction of the ECJ will last until eight years after the end of the transition period. (Article 158).

https://www.instituteforgovernment....analysis-shows-uk-rarely-taken-european-court

There is very little difference in our courts and principals with the EU. We share the same values and uphold same freedoms.

Much ado about nothing.


5. The UK will still be bound by any future changes to EU law in which it will have no say, not to mention having to comply with current law. (Article 6(2))

Inaccurate b0ll0cks here.

Quoting from agreement.
With the exception of Parts Four and Five, unless otherwise provided in this Agreement all references in this Agreement to Union law shall be understood as references to Union law, including as amended or replaced, as applicable on the last day of the transition period. Basically the future is limited to the transition period.

This is when I have a tantrum and accuse Brexiteers of having no scrouples and lying to the British people. Blatant p1ss poor interpretation of agreement.


6. Any disputes under the Agreement will be decided by EU law only – one of the most dangerous provisions. (Article 168). This cuts the UK off from International Law, something we’d never do with any foreign body. Arbitration will be governed by the existing procedural rules of the EU law – this is not arbitration as we would commonly understand it (i.e. between two independent parties). (Article 174)

More BS. Why refer to international law when we are members of a common market. ARE BREXITEERS CONFUSED. What has international law got to do with EU membership which we have signed up to and help form as the 2nd largest voting block. That goes for rules in the ECJ. Brexiteers confusing what laws they are bound by. Stupid dastardlies demonstrating either ineptitude or more lies to mislead British public.

A55 wipes and confused puppies come to mind here. I have no idea what International Agreements have anything to do with EU agreements we join and in the last 45 years helped draft out.


...


...


No point in entertaining the daft inaccurate and twisted article.

All you brexiteers need to think a little and judge for your selves. Don't be led by liers and deceivers who at best don't understand and at worst led by motives that lie hidden.

Always do your own research.

Question and judge everything that is put forward to you.


ONE FINAL POINT. Farage was promoting the Norwegian deal. Norwegian's are rule-taker members of the common market. So to argue against just goes to show Brexiteers have no plan and no real idea about what even the Norwegian model represents.


I'm left speechless at the BS that is going around. I really am. :(


Good luck to you numpties as you are going to need something a little stronger than luck to sort out the freaky mess you've made of the UK. (y)
 
Last edited:
For anyone interested, attached is a short synopsis of the 500+ page Brexit deal deal with the EU. I've not read the original text, so I can't vouch for its accuracy. Also, as it's published by the ERG, doubtless remainers will question whether or not it's a fair distillation of the original text!
;)
Tim.

Hi Tim,

Yes I have already made a genuine attempt to read and reply to points they raise but intellect leaves me exasperated at the interpretation and blatant distortion of truths.

There is GREAT injustice being made here, by people who don't know and understand who take Brexiteers at their word. Sadly I don't have the time to go through the lot but urge you to do your own discovery work.

There are I'm sure many other extreme elements such as CV who are quite prepared to simply walk away to their pie in the sky freedom to make deals with the rest of the World and I can only imagine they are a fringe element much like the Eurosceptics.

Fringe element and extreme who are prepared to lie and deceive the British public with false promises, inaccuracies and outright lies. :mad:


I feel Brexiteers as before need to demonstrate the what and the how. Not much chance of that happening as we can all see.


(y)
 
Brexiters are not interested in a deal which ties us in to the EU structures. Remoaners are the ones who want all this nonsense.
Brexiters are quite happy doing a trade deal and nothing more.

:LOL: therein lies the rub. Show me a trade deal that does not involve tying us into EU structures that are related to trade.

In any event I seem to recall the referendum rhetoric from your leaders that the EU would be falling over themselves to do a deal because “they need us a lot more than we need them”. Breathtaking arrogance or another straight lie.
 
:LOL: therein lies the rub. Show me a trade deal that does not involve tying us into EU structures that are related to trade.

In any event I seem to recall the referendum rhetoric from your leaders that the EU would be falling over themselves to do a deal because “they need us a lot more than we need them”. Breathtaking arrogance or another straight lie.

Eh! Canada deal is a simple trade deal and nothing more. Oh and it doesn't cost them a penny. The EU would be perfectly happy with that. UK establishment are the issue here as they seem to think that Brexit involves us being part n parcel of EU structures.
In case it's not clear....Brexiters are battling our own establishment first and foremost.
 
No point in entertaining the daft inaccurate and twisted article.

All you brexiteers need to think a little and judge for your selves. Don't be led by liers and deceivers who at best don't understand and at worst led by motives that lie hidden.

Always do your own research.

Question and judge everything that is put forward to you.


ONE FINAL POINT. Farage was promoting the Norwegian deal. Norwegian's are rule-taker members of the common market. So to argue against just goes to show Brexiteers have no plan and no real idea about what even the Norwegian model represents.


I'm left speechless at the BS that is going around. I really am. :(


Good luck to you numpties as you are going to need something a little stronger than luck to sort out the freaky mess you've made of the UK. (y)

More BS.
Farage has NEVER promoted the Norwegian model. Farage would be perfectly happy with a no deal trading WTO then negotiating an EU UK trade deal after we have left.
 
Remind me what that was about.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Party_(UK)_leadership_election,_1990

Scroll down to the paragraph "First ballot" - all explained. Basically she was so confident, that she didn't even see the need to be at Westminster. I suspect May is in denial and well overconfident also.

John Curtice's poll data doesn't bode well for what people think about May. https://www.express.co.uk/news/poli...a-may-polls-public-opinion-brexit-deal-latest
 
Last edited:
Top