Terrorism????...Blame America!!!!

Palestinian Casualties While Queuing for Food Since GHF Implementation: May 2025​

Reported Deaths and Injuries:
  • Since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began overseeing aid distribution in late May 2025, between 500 and 549 Palestinians have been killed while queuing for or attempting to access food at GHF distribution sites and other aid convoys125810.
  • The number of injured in these incidents is reported to be between 3,000 and 4,06612568.
Screenshot from 2025-06-29 04-56-33.png

Context and Patterns:
  • Fatalities and injuries have occurred almost daily at or near GHF distribution points, which are often located inside or adjacent to Israeli military zones12358.
  • Eyewitnesses, medical personnel, and journalists have frequently reported Israeli forces firing on crowds of Palestinians waiting for food, sometimes using live ammunition, tanks, and drones235.
  • UN agencies and humanitarian organizations have condemned the situation, describing the aid distribution points as "death traps" and warning that the operation is "inherently unsafe"1258.
  • Children have been among the casualties in more than half of the fatal incidents at food distribution sites since GHF began operations8.
Screenshot from 2025-06-29 04-57-48.png

Conclusion:

Since the GHF took over aid distribution in Gaza in late May 2025, at least 500–549 Palestinians have been killed and 3,000–4,066 injured while queuing for or attempting to access food, according to a range of credible sources including the UN, Gaza health authorities, and humanitarian organizations1256810. The majority of these casualties have occurred at or near GHF distribution sites, amid widespread reports of Israeli forces firing on unarmed civilians seeking aid.
 

Quote from the 613 Jewish doctrinal laws that allows genocide and ethnic cleansing​

There are commandments within the 613 Jewish mitzvot (commandments), based on the Torah, that explicitly call for the destruction of certain peoples—notably the seven Canaanite nations and the Amalekites. These are found in the biblical books of Deuteronomy and 1 Samuel and are reflected in traditional lists of the 613 commandments, such as those compiled by Maimonides.

Relevant commandments and their biblical sources include:
  • Not to keep alive any individual of the seven Canaanite nations:
    “But in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God is giving you for an inheritance, you shall save alive nothing that breathes, but you shall devote them to complete destruction…” (Deuteronomy 20:16–17)12.
  • To exterminate the seven Canaanite nations from the land of Israel:
    “You shall utterly destroy them…” (Deuteronomy 20:17)12.
  • To blot out the memory of Amalek:
    “You shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven. Do not forget!” (Deuteronomy 25:19)123.
  • The command to King Saul:
    “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox, and sheep, camel and ass.” (1 Samuel 15:3)132.
These commandments are directly cited in traditional lists of the 613 mitzvot and are understood as divine commands to the ancient Israelites to annihilate specific peoples at specific times124. They are the closest examples in the Jewish doctrinal corpus to explicit religious endorsement of genocide or ethnic cleansing.

However, it is crucial to note:
  • Rabbinic interpretation and later Jewish law do not generalise these commandments to justify genocide or ethnic cleansing in other contexts. Many rabbinic authorities have limited their applicability to those specific ancient nations, which are considered extinct, and have emphasized that such actions are not permitted against any other peoples13.
  • Jewish law explicitly forbids the killing of innocent people, even in war, according to later rabbinic authorities1.
  • Modern Jewish thought overwhelmingly rejects any application of these commandments to contemporary situations.
Screenshot from 2025-06-30 15-43-42.png

No commandment in the 613 mitzvot provides a general license for genocide or ethnic cleansing beyond these specific, ancient biblical cases. Any broader application is not supported by mainstream Jewish law or doctrine13.
 
Last edited:
Jewish fanatics and current extremist Netanyahu government and members of the Knesset
Jewish extremist violence and far-right ideologies have gained increased prominence and political influence in Israel in recent years, particularly within the current Netanyahu government and the Knesset. Here are the key points based on the available sources:
  • Far-right extremism in Israel is rooted in ideologies such as Kahanism, Jewish supremacism, and violent settler activism. Kahanism, inspired by Rabbi Meir Kahane, advocates for the expulsion of Arabs from Israel and the West Bank and has influenced modern political parties and activists. The Otzma Yehudit party, led by Itamar Ben Gvir (currently Israel’s Minister of National Security), is described as an “ultranationalist, Jewish supremacist political outfit” and is widely recognized as the ideological successor to Kahane’s movement1.
  • Key far-right figures in the current government include:
    • Itamar Ben Gvir: Former Kach activist, convicted of incitement to racism and supporting a terrorist organization. He has advocated for arming Israeli civilians and has been linked to groups like Lehava and the Hilltop Youth, known for violent settler extremism1.
    • Bezalel Smotrich: Finance Minister and leader of the Religious Zionism party, which merged several far-right factions. Smotrich has significant authority over the West Bank’s administration and has a history of radical activism, including a 2005 arrest for suspected involvement in violent protest (he was released without charge)15.
  • Violence and policy implications:
    • Jewish extremist violence against Palestinians in the West Bank has surged, especially after October 7, 2023. Incidents include attacks on Palestinian residents, property destruction, and efforts to restrict Palestinian movement. The UN reported an increase in violent acts by Jewish extremists from an average of three to seven per day after October 75.
    • Some far-right politicians have provided open or tacit support for extremist settlers and their actions. For example, Zvi Sukkot, a former Hilltop Youth member, now chairs the Knesset Subcommittee on Judea and Samaria (West Bank), reflecting the growing political influence of these circles5.
    • Calls for the expulsion or transfer of Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank have become more mainstream among far-right politicians and activists since the escalation of the Israel-Hamas conflict16.
  • The Netanyahu government has incorporated these far-right figures and their parties, giving them significant roles in shaping policy toward Palestinians and the occupied territories. This has led to increased concerns about state tolerance or encouragement of settler violence and policies that could amount to forced displacement or de facto annexation156.
In summary:
While the majority of Israeli society and the state’s legal framework do not endorse genocide or ethnic cleansing, Jewish fanatics and far-right extremists—including influential members of the current government and Knesset—have promoted ideologies and policies that advocate for the expulsion or subjugation of Palestinians, and have been linked to or supportive of violent actions against them156. This marks a significant and controversial shift in Israeli politics, with real-world consequences for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.
 
Jewish Polls: All citizen of Gaza are complicit in terrorism
A recent poll reported by Anadolu Agency in June 2024 found that 64% of Israelis believe there are "no innocents" in Gaza6. This figure reflects the proportion of the Israeli public who view all residents of Gaza as complicit in terrorism or not innocent in the context of the ongoing conflict.

This poll result is consistent with reporting that some Israeli media and public discourse have increasingly labeled all Gaza casualties as "terrorists," contributing to this perception6.

No other recent, large-scale public opinion surveys in the provided sources give a directly comparable figure; most focus on war objectives, trust in government, or attitudes toward peace and security, not specifically on perceptions of Gaza civilians’ complicity12345.

In summary:
64% of Israelis polled believe there are "no innocents" in Gaza, effectively viewing all Gaza residents as complicit in terrorism6.

Jewish Poll: Server Israeli military action should be conducted in Gaza
Recent polling data indicates that a significant proportion of Israeli Jews support more severe military action in Gaza:
  • 47% of Israeli Jews answered "yes" to the question: "Do you support the claim that the [Israeli army] in conquering an enemy city, should act in a manner similar to the way the Israelites did when they conquered Jericho under the leadership of Joshua, i.e., to kill all its inhabitants?" This is a direct reference to the biblical account of total destruction, indicating support for extremely harsh military measures15.
  • 44% of the Israeli public supports the current military operation in Gaza, according to a Channel 13 poll from May 20251.
  • 82% of Israeli Jews support the forced expulsion of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip, which, while not a direct endorsement of increased military violence, does indicate support for severe measures against the Gaza population15.
In summary:
Nearly half (47%) of Israeli Jews polled support the idea of the Israeli army killing all inhabitants in a conquered enemy city, specifically referencing Gaza. Additionally, support for forced expulsion is even higher, at 82% among Israeli Jews15.
 
An open letter signed by more than 3,000 Israelis, including intellectuals and academics, has called for global pressure on Israel to force an immediate ceasefire in Gaza1. The signatories describe their appeal as motivated by a patriotic duty to stop what they characterize as war crimes in Gaza and beyond, expressing frustration that the lack of international sanctions has enabled Israel to continue its military campaign, abandon hostages, ignore domestic opposition, and persecute Palestinian citizens of Israel without consequence1. The letter states:

“Unfortunately, the majority of Israelis support the continuation of the war and massacres, and a change from within is not currently feasible. The state of Israel is on a suicidal path and sows destruction and devastation that increase day by day,”
Click to expand...
One of the signatories, Professor Neve Gordon, emphasized the need for international powers, including the United States, to intervene and demand an end to the war1.

Separately, over 1,200 Israeli university academics and administrators issued a public letter condemning Israeli military actions in Gaza as "war crimes and even crimes against humanity," and urging Israeli educational leaders to take a stand against the war23. This letter, published by a group called the Black Flag Action Group, centers on the suffering of Palestinians and criticizes the silence of Israeli academic institutions in the face of what the signatories describe as mass killing, starvation, and the destruction of Gaza’s educational system23.

While there are multiple open letters from Israeli academics and intellectuals, the figure of 3,600 signatories is not directly confirmed in the available search results. The largest documented number is "more than 3,000" Israelis, as reported by Democracy Now!1. If you are referencing a specific letter with 3,600 signatories, it is possible that the number has increased since these reports, or that different sources are citing slightly different figures. However, the core message—a call for an immediate ceasefire and an end to the war in Gaza, with a focus on Palestinian suffering and a demand for international action—is consistent across these appeals213.
 

Guard at US-backed Gaza aid centres says colleagues fired on hungry Palestinian civilians | BBC News​

 
Phylo said:
Besides Muslim on Muslim violence, Soviet gulags and pogroms, Mao starvation, Belgium atrocities in the Congo Free State and other colonial massacres and resource thefts, Trump’s self-adulation is symbolic of two of the most nefarious forces on the planet: the United States—with its special relationship with the UK and its ally Israel, the tail that wags the dog—and that agent of diabolical religious persecutions and tortures and child sexual abuse, Catholicism.

Child Sexual Abuse by the Catholic Church
Centuries of Abuse and Secrecy
Sexual violence against children within the Catholic Church is a centuries-old issue, historically concealed by secrecy, cover-ups, and lack of accountability. The Church often transferred abusive clergy rather than reporting them, and resisted legal reforms aimed at justice for survivors.

France (1950–2020)
An independent inquiry in 2021 found that about 216,000 children, mostly boys aged 10–13, were sexually abused by clergy in the French Catholic Church between 1950 and 2020. Including lay members, the number could be as high as 330,000. The report accused the Church of "cruel indifference" and institutional cover-up, with most abuse unreported until recent decades.

Australia (1950–2010)
A 2017 Royal Commission found that 7% of Catholic priests in Australia were accused of child abuse, with over 4,444 allegations reported to Church authorities. In some dioceses, over 15% of priests were identified as offenders. Allegations were rarely investigated, and high-ranking clergy, including Cardinal George Pell, were implicated.

England and Wales (1970–2015)
Between 1970 and 2015, the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales received over 900 complaints involving more than 3,000 instances of child sexual abuse by over 900 individuals connected to the Church. There were 177 prosecutions and 133 convictions, but the true scale is likely much higher. The Church prioritized its reputation over the welfare of children, often failing to support victims and instead protecting perpetrators.

Poland (1990–2018)
Reports from over 10,000 parishes revealed that 382 priests were accused of abusing 625 children, mostly under 16, between 1990 and mid-2018. The Church was criticized for underestimating the problem and for failing to report cases to authorities, instead investigating internally and often moving accused clergy to new parishes.

Global and Institutional Response
The United Nations and advocacy groups have criticized the Holy See for systemic failures in child protection, transparency, and accountability. Despite public apologies and some reforms, progress has been slow due to internal resistance and lack of political will.

Religious Persecutions, Tortures, and Imprisonments by the Catholic Church
Medieval and Early Modern Periods (c. 12th–18th centuries)
The Catholic Church, especially through the Inquisition, played a central role in persecuting non-believers, heretics, and so-called "heathens." Methods included torture, imprisonment, and execution, justified as means to protect the faith and maintain religious unity. The Church claimed the right to use physical coercion against formal apostates and heretics, though it often adapted its methods to the political climate of the time.

Inquisition (c. 1230s–1800s)
The Medieval Inquisition (established in the 1230s), the Spanish Inquisition (1478–1834), and the Roman Inquisition (1542–c. 1800s) targeted Jews, Muslims, Protestants, and suspected witches, as well as non-believers. Accused individuals faced imprisonment, torture to extract confessions, and execution by burning or other means. The Inquisition's activities were sanctioned by papal authority and local rulers.

Suppression of Non-Christian Religions
Throughout the Middle Ages and into the early modern era, the Church supported or participated in the suppression of pagan, Jewish, and Muslim communities in Europe, especially during the Crusades and Reconquista. Non-believers were often forced to convert, expelled, or executed.

Apostasy and Heresy Laws
The Church's canon law and cooperation with secular authorities led to the imprisonment and execution of those accused of apostasy (leaving the faith) or heresy (holding beliefs contrary to Church doctrine). Punishments included excommunication, confiscation of property, imprisonment, torture, and death, particularly from the 13th to 17th centuries.

Persecution of Galileo and Suppression of Scientific Facts
Giordano Bruno (1600)
Philosopher Giordano Bruno, who supported the heliocentric theory and other scientific ideas, was tried by the Inquisition and burned at the stake for heresy.

Galileo Galilei and Heliocentrism (1610–1633)
Galileo Galilei promoted the heliocentric model, which placed the Sun at the center of the universe, based on his telescopic observations.

1616: The Inquisition declared heliocentrism "formally heretical" and banned Copernicus’s and Galileo’s works. Galileo was ordered to abandon the theory and not to teach or defend it in any way.

1632: Galileo published Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, defending heliocentrism.

1633: The Inquisition tried Galileo for heresy, found him "vehemently suspect of heresy," forced him to recant, and sentenced him to house arrest for life. His book was banned, and he was threatened with torture if he did not comply.

The Church maintained the ban on heliocentric works until 1758, and only in 1835 were Galileo’s and Copernicus’s works removed from the Index of Forbidden Books. In 1992, the Church formally acknowledged that Galileo had been unfairly persecuted.

Other Suppressions of Scientific Fact
The Church also opposed other proven scientific facts when they conflicted with doctrine, including early resistance to anatomical dissection and, later, to Darwinian evolution (though these were less often prosecuted as criminal heresy than the Galileo case).

References :
  1. Wikipedia: Catholic Church sexual abuse cases : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cases
  2. IICSA: Roman Catholic Church Investigation Report : https://www.iicsa.org.uk/reports-re.../roman-catholic-church/executive-summary.html
  3. BBC: French Church abuse - 216,000 children were victims : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-58801183
  4. CRIN: Child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church : https://home.crin.org/issues/sexual-violence/sexual-violence-against-children-catholic-church
  5. New Advent: Catholic Encyclopedia - Persecution : https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11703a.htm
  6. Al Jazeera: The global scale of child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church : https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/10/5/awful-truth-child-sex-abuse-in-the-catholic-church
  7. Wikipedia: Galileo affair : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_affair
  8. Galileo Timeline (PDF)
  9. UCLA Newsroom: The truth about Galileo and his conflict with the Catholic Church : https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/the-truth-about-galileo-and-his-conflict-with-the-catholic-church
  10. Italian Art Society: Galileo banned in 1616 : https://www.italianartsociety.org/2...ng-the-opinion-that-the-earth-orbits-the-sun/
Click to expand...

Key Positive Works and Influences of the Catholic Church
  • Education:
    Catholic institutions play a major role in providing quality education to people of all religions, cultures, and ethnicities. In India, Catholic universities and schools are recognized for their academic excellence and inclusivity, with over 500 Catholic colleges and thousands of schools, many situated in rural and underserved areas. These institutions have educated generations, helped reduce illiteracy, and offered opportunities to marginalized communities13567.
  • Healthcare and Social Services:
    The Church runs thousands of hospitals, clinics, leprosy centers, homes for the elderly, orphanages, and rehabilitation centers. These facilities often serve the poorest and most vulnerable, providing essential services regardless of religious background57.
  • Linguistic and Cultural Development:
    Catholic missionaries have contributed to the development of indigenous languages by introducing written scripts and promoting local literature, especially in Northeast India2. The Church has also played a role in preserving and celebrating local cultures while fostering unity among diverse communities6.
  • National Integration and Social Cohesion:
    The Church has encouraged peace, conflict resolution, and national integration, particularly in regions with histories of ethnic or tribal conflict. Its work in Nagaland, for example, is credited with promoting unity and social harmony among different groups6.
  • Advocacy for Religious Freedom and Human Rights:
    During India's independence movement, Catholic leaders advocated for constitutional guarantees of religious freedom and minority rights, influencing the secular character of the Indian Constitution3.
  • Women’s Empowerment:
    In regions like Meghalaya, the Church has fostered matriarchal leadership and given women significant roles in community life, contributing to gender equity and empowerment8.
  • Poverty Alleviation and Humanitarian Work:
    Catholic organizations, most notably the Missionaries of Charity founded by Mother Teresa, have provided care for the destitute, dying, and marginalized, earning global recognition for their humanitarian work7.
  • Development in Remote Regions:
    The Church has brought education, healthcare, and infrastructure to remote and previously inaccessible areas, such as Arunachal Pradesh and other parts of Northeast India, often being the first to provide such services24.
While the Catholic Church faces criticism and scrutiny—especially regarding historical and ongoing abuses—its positive social impact in India and other non-Western countries is substantial, touching millions of lives through education, healthcare, social justice, and community development1235678.
 
Last edited:
NO SURPRISE - EXPOSING ISRAELI LIES
“I’ve been to Darfur, I’ve been to Kupiansk on the Ukraine frontlines. I’ve driven up through Syria just after the fall of the Assad regime. I’ve just been in Kandahar, Kabul, Kunduz in Afghanistan. I was in Mandalay just after the earthquake.
  • "Nothing was as bad as going to Gaza.”
UN Humanitarian Chief Tom Fletcher joins Mehdi Hasan on this episode of ‘Mehdi Unfiltered’ where they discuss the Israeli siege, accusations of antisemitism at the UN, and the genocide in Sudan. He also debunks the Israeli claim that Hamas is stealing civilian aid.
 

Fatalities: Palestinian Medics - International Aid workers - Journalists.​

Details​

  • Palestinian Medics:
    Over 1,400 healthcare workers have been killed in Gaza since October 2023,     including those killed in hospitals, ambulances, and during rescue operations1.
  • International Aid Workers:
    At least 463 aid workers, including 319 UN staff, have been killed in Gaza. This figure includes both international and local (primarily Palestinian) humanitarian workers2.
  • Journalists:
    Estimates for journalists and media workers killed range from 180 (as of early July 2025) to 232    , with the vast majority being Palestinian. This conflict is considered the deadliest for journalists in modern history34.
These figures are based on the latest available reports and may continue to rise as the conflict persists.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2025-07-06 15-46-17.png
    Screenshot from 2025-07-06 15-46-17.png
    37.4 KB · Views: 8
Last edited:
Benjamin Netanyahu faces corruption charges in three main cases—Case 1000, Case 2000, and Case 4000—all involving allegations of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust13578.
Screenshot from 2025-07-06 15-46-17.png

If convicted of bribery, Netanyahu could face up to 10 years in prison and/or financial penalties58.

Netanyahu's Response:
He denies all wrongdoing, claiming the charges are part of a politically motivated campaign to remove him from office, and describes the proceedings as a "witch hunt"157810.
 

Israeli Academic: "I Was Wrong" About Gaza Genocide - w/. Shaiel Ben-Ephraim​

One does not have to agree with someone - but if they are not given opportunity to complete their cycles of communications chaos and incomplete understanding of the dialog is the result - welcome to Owen Jones dialog modus-oprandi.

Comment Phylo: * Owen Jones Mental heath Issues
Screenshot from 2025-07-07 15-17-09.png

Listening to Owen is like listening to an emotional, overexcited child, jumping up n' down — who cannot discuss without the 'I must win, I must win' and 'I must push my agenda' mentality. Let's here it from the horse's mouth - not from your agents.
Screenshot from 2025-07-07 14-35-15.png

Screenshot from 2025-07-07 15-08-39.png

* Mental Health Issues of Owen Jones
Owen Jones, the British journalist and political commentator, has publicly discussed his experiences with mental health challenges. The key points are:
  • ADHD Diagnosis: Owen Jones has been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). He has spoken openly about what this diagnosis means for him and how it impacts his daily life1.
  • Mental Health Advocacy: Jones has addressed broader issues of mental health, including the stigma surrounding mental distress. He has discussed the importance of recognizing mental health as a positive and integral part of one's identity, rather than something to be hidden or ashamed of2.
  • Impact of Abuse and Threats: As a high-profile journalist, Jones has also spoken about the psychological toll of persistent online abuse, threats, and harassment, which can contribute to anxiety and other mental health pressures3.
There is no public record of Owen Jones discussing other specific mental health diagnoses beyond ADHD, but he has been an advocate for mental health awareness and has highlighted the challenges faced by those in the public eye.

Drugs: Owen Jones has publicly stated that he does not use illegal drugs such as cocaine. In response to speculation about his behavior during a televised interview, he clarified that he was taking amphetamines—specifically, Elvanse (lisdexamfetamine), a prescription medication for ADHD—prescribed by the NHS14. He emphasized that this medication is for his diagnosed ADHD and is not a "miracle drug," noting it does not eliminate symptoms like fast talking or clumsiness1.

There is no evidence or public admission of recreational or illegal drug use by Owen Jones. He has, in fact, been outspoken about the stigma and hypocrisy surrounding drug laws and drug use in public debate, but his comments have focused on policy rather than personal use5.
 
Last edited:

Israeli committing ‘manifest war crime’ says legal scholar who defended Tel Aviv at ICJ genocide case​

A leading member of Israel’s legal team in the genocide case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has publicly condemned the Israeli military’s latest operation in Gaza as a “manifest war crime”. Professor Eyal Benvenisti, a prominent international law expert and director of the Lauterpacht Centre at Cambridge University, co-authored a scathing legal opinion warning that Israel’s policy of forcibly “concentrating and moving” Gaza’s population amounts to a grave breach of international law.

Published on 8 July in Haaretz, the opinion, co-written with legal philosopher Professor Chaim Gans, denounces the IDF’s current campaign, dubbed Operation “Gideon’s Chariots”, as a clear case of forcible population transfer, a crime prohibited under the Fourth Geneva Convention and classified as both a war crime and a crime against humanity under the Rome Statute.

Benvenisti explains that under international law, moving civilians during wartime is only allowed in very limited and clearly defined situations—mainly when it is urgently needed to protect them from immediate danger. Even then, strict conditions must be met: the evacuation must be temporary, civilians must be guaranteed safe routes and access to aid, and they must be allowed to return home once the fighting ends.

According to Benvenisti, Israel’s current order to “concentrate and move” Gaza’s population fails to meet any of these requirements. Instead of aiming to protect civilians, the plan he argues is designed to push Palestinians out of Gaza altogether. This is confirmed by public statements from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former IDF Chief of Staff Moshe Ya’alon, who have openly described the policy as one of permanent removal of Palestinians from the territory, which is a clear violation of international law.

In a Knesset address in May, Netanyahu explicitly said: “We are demolishing more and more [of their] homes, they have nowhere to return to. The only obvious result will be the desire of the Gazans to emigrate outside the Strip.” The legal scholars interpret this as direct evidence of an intent to forcibly transfer civilians, an act Benvenisti warns is punishable under both Israeli and international law.

The opinion draws upon precedents set by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and emphasises that Israel’s own laws, including a 1950 statute, define deportation and other inhumane acts against civilian populations as crimes against humanity.

Most significantly, the authors argue that the IDF’s orders are “manifestly unlawful,” stripping soldiers and commanders of any legal defence under the doctrine of “superior orders.” Article 34M of the Israeli Penal Code, they point out, requires disobedience to such illegal orders, placing legal liability on every level of command, up to and including the Chief of Staff.

Benvenisti’s break with the Israeli government’s legal position is particularly striking. He played a central role in defending Israel’s actions before the ICJ last year, when South Africa accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.

The legal opinion comes at a time when human rights groups and UN experts have warned that Israel’s actions in Gaza, including the destruction of homes, denial of humanitarian aid, and repeated forced displacements, are fuelling what may amount to an irreversible campaign of ethnic cleansing.

Benvenisti and Gans conclude that “There is no moral or legal obligation to obey the order, but more importantly: there is a moral—and legal—obligation to disobey it.”
www.middleeastmonitor.com

Israeli committing ‘manifest war crime’ says legal scholar who defended Tel Aviv at ICJ genocide case

A leading member of Israel’s legal team in the genocide case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has publicly condemned the Israeli military’s latest operation in Ga…
www.middleeastmonitor.com www.middleeastmonitor.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Atilla
Afghanistan & Iraq
2 3
Replies
45
Views
11K
fibonelli
fibonelli
C
Suddenly, it all seems worth it.....
Replies
0
Views
2K
charliechan
C
Pat494
Terrorism. New approach !
2 3 4
Replies
67
Views
14K
piphoe
piphoe
T
So why exactly are we at war?
Replies
9
Views
3K
Merlins
M
bbmac
Obama and the Future
2 3 4
Replies
69
Views
13K
abbeyandriana
A
Back
Top