Afghanistan & Iraq

Atilla

Legendary member
Messages
20,773
Likes
3,973
Interesting interview with a Taliban

Interview With Ex-Taliban Foreign Minister

Friday , 20 April 2007

By Chris Sands, Journalist



There was a time in recent memory when the people here had nothing but God and a Kalashnikov to keep them safe. In the 1990s Afghanistan was imploding but few in the West cared. Those with power abused it, those with wealth flaunted it, and everyone else lived in the knowledge that each morning could be their last.

Back then, Mullah Wakil Ahmad Mutawakil was just another young man whose father had been killed during the Soviet occupation. He needed a reason to hope and one day he found it. By his mid-20s he was at the forefront of a movement that first stabilised the country, then allegedly helped bring war to America and changed the way Islam was perceived across the world.

“At the time I started with the Taliban every village had its own government and very dangerous issues threatened Afghanistan,” he said. “Every government was making a new currency, every government had its own ministry of defence, everyone had their own private airports.


"We had no other purpose, it was just to give the country freedom. We did not represent any other government."
“For the purpose of stopping the division of the country and solving the problems inside the country ? improving the transportation system and saving innocent people from warlords and their rockets ? the Taliban movement was set up. And a thousand people like me joined it. We had no other purpose, it was just to give the country freedom. We did not represent any other government and we did not stand for anyone else.”
"No Other Purpose"

The kind of impoverished, deeply religious young men still found across Afghanistan formed the Taliban. They were initially welcomed as saviours by a population tired of having old Mujahideen commanders kill and kidnap at will.

"We wanted a peaceful Afghanistan and good relations with other countries," Mutawakil said. "Now people think the Taliban wanted to make a country full of terrorists, but we didn't want that."

Less than two years after capturing Kandahar, they rolled into Kabul, bringing a fragile peace to the devastated city and imposing their strict interpretation of the Quran on its people.

With Mutawakil working as spokesman for Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar and later as foreign minister, the new government banned music and kite flying, sanctioned capital punishment and forced all men to grow beards.

"We hoped our laws would bring freedom to everyone in every part of their life, but we did not have lots of facilities," Mutawakil said. "Nowadays lots of countries are giving donations to Afghanistan, but at that time they were only wagging their fingers at us and complaining."

The most notorious edicts were aimed at the female population. Women were not allowed out alone and when they were in public they had to cover their entire bodies. It was said that girls were stopped from going to school.

“We are against co-education, but we are happy with separate education,” Mutawakil insisted. “For example, in Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries people are studying separately, which is according to Islamic law. If women wear the hijab they can go to school.”

Hard Times in Power


"The only solution was for the Arabs to live here quietly, safely, as immigrants ... not as fighters."
After capturing the south and Kabul, the Taliban pushed onwards in an effort to establish control over the whole country. A movement of rival warlords known as the Northern Alliance put up fierce resistance and appealed for outside support in its struggle against the new government. Untold numbers of people were maimed and killed by both sides, many of them civilians.
But the West only really began to take notice of what was happening when Osama bin Laden returned to Afghanistan, a country he had helped liberate from Soviet occupation while fighting alongside other jihadists.

The Saudi was now regarded as a terrorist by Washington and he soon became a close ally of the Taliban, encouraging more foreign militants to come and join those who had remained in the country since the 1980s.

“We did not hate them, we had a sort of love in our hearts for them. But it was not worth the price for us ? it was not worth putting our lives in danger, which is what happened,” Mutawakil said.

“The only solution was for the Arabs to live here quietly, safely, as immigrants. They should have lived here as immigrants, not as fighters.”

Mutawakil denied the Taliban had any prior knowledge of 9/11 and he believes the US may already have been planning to overthrow the regime before New York and Washington were hit.

Four months after the US-led invasion of Afghanistan started, the foreign minister handed himself over to the local authorities. He was held for a night and then transferred to American custody, where he remained for most of the next two years.


"I think inside the Afghan government there are people who are far worse criminals than the Taliban."
It is not easy to meet Mutawakil now. Private security guards stand watch outside his home and he claims the government keeps track of his every move.
On a freezing cold January morning he agreed to this exclusive interview. A friendly bespectacled man, he talked in Pashto for almost two hours about his life and the difficulties Afghanistan faces.

“All of our problems were not solved under the Taliban,” he said. “But the interesting thing from that time, and lots of people are remembering this now, is the tight security there was in the country.

“When the new regime came people had lots of hope, but one day they found out nothing was happening and they had even lost the tight security they had under the Taliban.”

New Return?


"The biggest problem now faced by the world is that it does not know the exact definition of terrorism"
About 4,000 people are estimated to have died in the insurgency last year, a body count roughly four times higher than in 2005 and the worst since the invasion. Indiscriminate suicide attacks are common now, as are reports of NATO-led forces killing civilians in air strikes and shootings. The Taliban already control areas close to Kabul city and further violence is expected following the winter.
Mutawakil believes the only way to stop the situation escalating into a nationwide jihad is for the Karzai administration and its allies to open high-level talks with the insurgents.

“Now the foreigners think all the Taliban are terrorists,” he said. “I think inside the Afghan government there are people who are far worse criminals than the Taliban, they have committed many crimes.

“So the best way is to forgive everyone. It’s better to start negotiations. Of course there will be problems as the foreigners don’t like the Taliban and call them terrorists, and the Taliban don’t like the foreigners, but the best way is to start negotiations. By negotiations we can move forward step by step.

“The biggest problem now faced by the world is that it does not know the exact definition of terrorism; who is a terrorist, where are the terrorists. I think that terrorism can be in every society, it’s not unique to any tribe, to any religion, to any person –you can have it everywhere.”

But with NATO determined to defeat the insurgency by force, corrupt warlords still holding the reins of power and more heavy fighting due in the spring, it looks like the kind of anger that first launched the Taliban will explode into the open once again.

“There is no hope for the people - their hearts are broken,” Mutawakil said.
 
Fake American Heros in Iraq

Exposed, the 'weekend warrior' who was no hero
By Andrew Thomas, in Raleigh, North Carolina


WASHINGTON — Two high-profile US army personnel have accused the military of spreading outright lies and manipulating their stories for a hero-starved public to distract attention from the failures in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"I am still confused why they chose to lie and make me a legend," Jessica Lynch told a Congress session on Tuesday, April 24, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).
 
Perhaps when "Loose Change Final Cut" hits the cinemas around the world in 5-8 months, public opinion will see an even bigger change regarding the "war/s on terror".
 
Last edited:
JTrader said:
Perhaps when "Loose Change Final Cut" hits the cinemas around the world in 5-8 months, public opinion will see an even bigger change regarding the "war/s on terror".


The US House of Representatives has narrowly approved a bill making further funding of the war in Iraq conditional on a timetable for a US troop pullout.

I wonder if this news has anything to do with the markets booming.

End of war.

End of the dollar gravy train. No more dollars, no more wars...

$100bn conditional upon pull out.

Bush will now have to brake his piggy bank if he still wants to play soldiers... :mad:
 
JTrader said:
Perhaps when "Loose Change Final Cut" hits the cinemas around the world in 5-8 months, public opinion will see an even bigger change regarding the "war/s on terror".

Certainly would be interested to see this film.

Another piece of news on accountability -

The US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has said she is unwilling to answer a US House of Representatives subpoena about Iraq's pre-war weapons.
A House committee wants to question Ms Rice about a White House assertion that Iraq was trying to buy uranium from Niger to build nuclear weapons.

The White House claim, now discredited, formed part of the US justification for invading Iraq in 2003.
 
I understand that Mr Blair would be delighted if one or more of his offspring served in Iraq.

This is total confirmation that the pillock is either completely insane or is a out and out bare-faced liar.

A combination of both I would say.
 
In 2002 regular people were saying the escalating tensions with Iraq were about oil, and the desire to control it. It was obvious to some back then.

It is hard to comprehend that in a world of 6.5 billion people, the elite minority that control the media & the military industrial complex, can have so much power, and the other 6.499....billion are powerless, and have to accept the world agenda that has been set by the elite few.
 
Last edited:
yacarob1 said:
I understand that Mr Blair would be delighted if one or more of his offspring served in Iraq.

This is total confirmation that the pillock is either completely insane or is a out and out bare-faced liar.

A combination of both I would say.

There's a big difference between being "delighted" that one of his children would want to serve in a war, and ACTUALLY allowing that child to serve in a war.
 
Yes, I agree and that excuse for a man would never even allow his precious ones to join the Salvation Army let alone the real thing.
 
Brave New World - historically most conflicts have been about ideology, boundaries, power - now its about money. Corporations now make and take nations into war. Blair and Bush are incredulous. They purport to be christians yet they have killed on an unimagineable scale. How these people live with themselves I will never understand..They have stoked a fire in Iraq which will not burn out overnight. The country is going to implode further and become another Afghanistan. Where there is poverty, the only salvation is religion. And if your not in my club, you are dispensible. The irony is John Smith I know, had he been Prime Minister, would have not taken this course of action. Tony Blair in a court setting is the mischevious jester who came to power as John Smith fell to his fate. The man has no pride as demonstrated when Blair wanting to go to the middle east was promptly dismissed in favour of Condi Rice. Blair sees himself a statesman whereas in fact he is a second class meglomaniac wannabe. So its Vietnam 1 USA 0 - Iraq 1 USA 0. and as to Iran. Dont even think about it - they will seriously kick USA ass for sure.
 


$4m dollars for the book? Shocking.

However it's got to be one I read.

Cook the late Labour foreign minister was one of few politicians to resign based on his views re: Iraq war. Now there is a truly leader.

Blair in the senate giving a speech to the US senators beaming with that horrible grin and standing next to Bush, anybody watching the show would think these two dim wits had achieved something or given something fantastic to man kind. All that comes to my mind is death and destruction and the squander of tax payers money.

Makes my blood boil how they can do so much rubbish and have so much to say about them selves. Mark of a good politician I suppose, like a top salesman they sell you crap you don't need or want.
 
You don't say... You are kidding me right? How effing noble of them to admin...

US troops admit abusing Iraqis

So the photos were for real then.

On a serious note. I did comment before that the US were single handedly responsible for the uprising and so called insurgency.

Instead the dim wits are still blaming the Iranians and Syrians for border controls and carrying out the attacks. Denial or what?



In the current talks held in Egypt the Iranians said the following...

As the conference drew to a close on Friday, Manouchehr Mottaki, Iran's foreign minister, instead attacked US policy and said Washington should take responsibility for the growing chaos in Iraq.

"There should be no doubt that the continuation of and increase in terrorist acts in Iraq originates from the flawed approaches adopted by the foreign troops," Mottaki said.

"The United States must accept the responsibilities arising from the occupation of Iraq.

"To create a safe haven for those terrorists who try to turn Iraqi territory into a base for attacking Iraq's neighbours should be condemned."

Earlier speculation that the conference could herald a thawing of relations between the US and Iran came after earlier sideline talks on the meeting improved relations between Washington and Syria.

US raid criticised



What does Bush do? Deny all, veto democrats bill and request another $100bn + to spend on death and destruction. Kewl muve Bush dude :devilish: :cool: :devilish:
 
"US responsible for insurgency"

It's good to see that we have not all become talking monkeys.

"US insurgency", it’s the old "Red Cell Strategy" as used in Northern Ireland etc... !

The truth always comes out; it’s just a matter of whether we will be around when it does and then hoping that true justice will follow, wishful thinking....

The new improved security measures by the US in Iraq are having the desired effect.... acceleration to full scale civil war is going according to plans ...

Ship out some Red Bull to Baghdad...
 
Cost freedom and liberty as Uncle Sam sees it.

It's good to see that we have not all become talking monkeys.

"US insurgency", it’s the old "Red Cell Strategy" as used in Northern Ireland etc... !

The truth always comes out; it’s just a matter of whether we will be around when it does and then hoping that true justice will follow, wishful thinking....

The new improved security measures by the US in Iraq are having the desired effect.... acceleration to full scale civil war is going according to plans ...

Ship out some Red Bull to Baghdad...


Cost freedom and liberty as Uncle Sam sees it. Is this payback the US demands for causing the death of 600,000 people and the destruction of Iraq?

Row over Iraq oil law

"The situation would be reversed when Iraqis regained their "true sovereignty". "
 
Top