Terrorism????...Blame America!!!!

"Strange Fruit" and Its Connection to Lynchings in the US South

"Strange Fruit" as Protest and Art

The lyrics of "Strange Fruit" derive from the poem written by Abel Meeropol*, under the pen name of Lewis Allan**. Its lyrics, originally published as a poem in 1937, are a direct protest against the lynching of Black Americans, particularly in the Southern United States15. The song uses stark, haunting imagery to compare the bodies of lynching victims to fruit hanging from trees:
Southern trees bear a strange fruit,
Blood on the leaves and blood at the root,
Black bodies swinging in the Southern breeze,
Strange fruit hanging from the poplar trees.

Pastoral scene of the gallant South,
The bulging eyes and the twisted mouth,
Scent of magnolias, sweet and fresh,
Then the sudden smell of burning flesh.

Here is a fruit for the crows to pluck,
For the rain to gather, for the wind to suck,
For the sun to rot, for the trees to drop,
Here is a strange and bitter crop.
These metaphors are both shocking and powerful, forcing listeners to confront the brutal reality of racial violence. The song’s juxtaposition of the serene Southern landscape with the horror of lynching creates a jarring effect, highlighting the normalization of such violence within the broader culture25.


Historical Context: Lynchings in the US South

Lynching in the United States, especially in the South, was a widespread practice of extrajudicial killings, primarily targeting African Americans after the Civil War and during the Jim Crow era6. Between 1882 and 1968, nearly 3,500 African Americans were lynched, with more than 73% of these acts occurring in the Southern states36. These acts were often public spectacles, with large crowds gathering, and were justified under accusations ranging from murder and rape to minor social transgressions or even no offense at all46. The real purpose was often to enforce white supremacy, intimidate Black communities, and maintain racial hierarchies46.

Lynchings were rarely prosecuted, as there was no federal anti-lynching legislation for most of this period, and local authorities frequently condoned or participated in the violence4. The legacy of this era has had a lasting impact on American society, contributing to ongoing racial tensions and systemic inequalities4.

Cultural and Political Impact of "Strange Fruit"

"Strange Fruit" was more than just a song; it was a bold act of protest and a catalyst for change. Its release was met with fear and resistance from record labels, who worried about backlash from Southern audiences1. Despite this, the song became an anthem for the early civil rights movement, described by Atlantic Records co-founder Ahmet Ertegun as "a declaration of war" and "the beginning of the civil rights movement"15.

The song’s influence extended beyond music, helping to galvanize anti-lynching campaigns and raise awareness about racial violence in America5. It was recognized for its cultural and historical significance, being preserved in the National Recording Registry and named one of the "Songs of the Century"1.

Enduring Legacy

Today, "Strange Fruit" remains a stark reminder of America's history of racial violence and the power of art to confront injustice. While lynching as a public spectacle has ended, the song continues to resonate as a symbol of the ongoing struggle against racism and the importance of remembering the victims of such atrocities5.

In summary, "Strange Fruit" stands as one of the most potent artistic responses to the horrors of lynching in the US South, immortalizing both the suffering of its victims and the resilience of those who dared to speak out125.

* Abel Meeropol, the writer of "Strange Fruit," was a Jewish-American teacher, poet, and activist, but he was not particularly known for being a practicing Jew in the religious sense. Instead, his identity was more strongly tied to his political activism, secularism, and leftist ideals.

Key Points About Abel Meeropol's Background:
  1. Secular & Politically Active – Meeropol was deeply involved in socialist and communist circles during the 1930s-50s. His activism focused on civil rights, anti-racism, and labor movements, rather than religious observance.
  2. Jewish Heritage, But Not Religious – While he was of Jewish descent, there is no strong evidence that he practiced Judaism in a traditional or devout way. His work and public life were far more aligned with leftist political causes than religious ones.
  3. Adopted the Rosenbergs' Sons – After Julius and Ethel Rosenberg (Jewish communists executed as spies in 1953) were killed, Meeropol and his wife adopted their two sons, further showing his commitment to radical political causes over religious identity.
Conclusion:
Meeropol was culturally Jewish but not known as a practicing, religious Jew. His legacy is defined by his anti-racist activism, poetry, and political engagement rather than religious observance.

** Abel Meeropol published the poem "Strange Fruit" under the pseudonym "Lewis Allan" for deeply personal reasons. The name "Lewis Allan" was chosen to honor his two children who were stillborn; these were the names he and his wife had intended for them1245. This act of remembrance gave the pseudonym special significance in his life and work.

Additionally, Meeropol, as a Jewish writer and a member of the American Communist Party during a period of widespread anti-Semitism and political suspicion in the United States, may have found it prudent to use a pseudonym to protect his identity and avoid potential backlash or discrimination45. Thus, the pseudonym "Lewis Allan" served both as a tribute to personal loss and as a protective measure in a fraught social and political climate.
 
Last edited:
Comparative Analysis: Land Dispossession in the US (Indigenous Peoples) and the West Bank (Palestinians)

1. Appropriation

  • US: The US government used legal means such as the Indian Appropriation Act to unilaterally redefine tribal land, ending tribal sovereignty and making it easier to seize land. Treaties were often signed under duress or ignored.
  • West Bank: Israel uses legal maneuvers, such as declaring Palestinian land “state land” based on Ottoman law, to appropriate territory. This bureaucratic process is opaque, often lacking clear boundaries, and is used to connect settlements and facilitate annexation57.
Similarity: Both systems use legal and bureaucratic frameworks to legitimize land appropriation, often exploiting ambiguities or outdated laws to dispossess the original inhabitants.

2. Outright Theft

  • US: Land was taken by force, often through military campaigns and forced removals like the Trail of Tears. Treaties were routinely broken, and violence was used to expel Indigenous people.
  • West Bank: Israeli settlers, often with the protection or participation of the Israeli military, engage in violent land grabs, destroy homes and crops, and forcibly displace Palestinians. Since October 2023, land theft and home demolitions have accelerated, with tens of thousands displaced456.
Similarity: Both cases involve state-sanctioned or state-enabled violence and direct theft to expel populations and seize land.

3. Financial Trickery and Manipulation

  • US: The Dawes Act broke up communal land into individual allotments, making it easy for speculators to buy land from Indigenous people through fraud or coercion. Treaties included deceptive terms, and land sales were often manipulated.
  • West Bank: Settlers receive land through contracts from the World Zionist Organization, often without clear boundaries or compensation, enabling the quiet transfer of land. Israeli courts retroactively legalize land theft, and Palestinians are denied building permits, forcing them to build “illegally” and making them vulnerable to demolition356.
Similarity: Both systems use complex legal and financial mechanisms to obscure and facilitate the transfer of land from the original population to settlers, often with the complicity or direct involvement of state institutions.

State and Military Involvement

  • US: The US government and army directly enforced land seizures, removals, and violent suppression of Indigenous resistance.
  • West Bank: The Israeli government and military protect settlers, facilitate demolitions, and legalize land grabs. Settler violence is often tolerated or supported, and the state provides financial and legal backing for land appropriation567.

Conclusion

Both the US and Israeli cases demonstrate a pattern of settler-colonial dispossession: legal appropriation, outright theft, and financial trickery, all underwritten by state and military power. The methods—though adapted to their respective contexts—share striking similarities in their goals and outcomes: the removal of an indigenous population to make way for a settler society, often justified by legal, bureaucratic, or military means, and implemented with violence, deception, and systematic state support3567.
 
Screenshot from 2025-05-28 18-27-48.png

 
Back
Top