Phylo
Veteren member
- Messages
- 4,285
- Likes
- 398
Bill Clinton claimed that in 2000, Palestinians were offered a state on nearly the entire West Bank and East Jerusalem as its capital, which Israel accepted but Palestinians refused, and that Palestinians did not care about a homeland but only wanted to kill Israelis. This statement is partially accurate regarding the outline of the Camp David offers, but it is highly misleading and oversimplified in its characterization of Palestinian motives and the reasons for rejection.cfi+2
The Camp David 2000 Offers
- At Camp David in July 2000, Israel offered Palestinians a state including about 94–96% of the West Bank, all of Gaza, and Arab neighborhoods of East Jerusalem for their capital.wikipedia+2
- The proposal allowed some Israeli annexation of major settlement blocks, with land swaps offered to compensate, but left unresolved issues such as the "right of return" for Palestinian refugees and Israeli security arrangements.wikipedia+1
- Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and negotiators expressed concerns over the proposed deal, finding it would fragment Palestinian territories and did not meet demands for full sovereignty in East Jerusalem or a just solution for refugees.reddit+1
Reasons for Palestinian Rejection
- Palestinian negotiators made significant concessions, including possible Israeli sovereignty over parts of East Jerusalem, but felt the Israeli offer failed to provide a contiguous, viable state and sufficient control over the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif.imeu+2
- The biggest sticking point was the right of return for refugees: Israel insisted on minimal returns to Israel proper, while Palestinians demanded more substantive rights.wikipedia+1
- U.S. and Israeli officials generally blamed Arafat for the collapse, but other analysts note this was a highly complex negotiation with deep mistrust on both sides and that both sides accepted the Clinton Parameters only "with reservations" that reflected real differences.wikipedia+1
Mischaracterization of Motives
- Clinton and other officials have said groups like Hamas (not involved in Camp David) cared more about opposing Israel than about a two-state solution.cfi
- However, the assertion that "all [the Palestinians] wanted was to kill Israelis" is not supported by the public record of the negotiations or by most expert analyses; the Palestinian leadership was negotiating for statehood but could not accept the terms offered as a final deal.imeu+2
- The rejection did not mean Palestinians opposed statehood but rather that the proposed terms did not meet their minimum requirements on territory, sovereignty, and refugees.imeu+2
Context and Aftermath
- The failure of the talks contributed to the outbreak of the Second Intifada, but it was rooted in deep disagreements rather than a simple refusal of a homeland.wikipedia+1
- Later negotiations (Taba, Clinton Parameters) saw further concessions from both sides, but a final agreement was not reached.reddit+1
Conclusion
The factual part of Clinton’s claim—that Palestinians rejected a generous statehood offer—is generally reflected in history, though the actual terms were less than "the entire West Bank and east Jerusalem." His characterization of Palestinian motives as solely violent, and not caring about homeland, is inaccurate and ignores the complexity and validity of Palestinian concerns about the peace offer.wikipedia+2- https://imeu.org/resources/palestine-101/what-happened-at-camp-david-in-2000-1/353
- https://www.cfi.org.uk/news.php?article=819
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Camp_David_Summit
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Clinton_Parameters
- https://www.timesofisrael.com/bill-...o-learn-arafat-turned-down-palestinian-state/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Intifada
- https://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/bill-clinton-palestinians-israel-223176
- https://www.chathamhouse.org/2018/07/israeli-palestinian-peacemaking/camp-david-approach-2000
- https://www.npr.org/2023/10/19/1207...nians-were-talking-about-a-two-state-solution
