meanreversion
Senior member
- Messages
- 3,398
- Likes
- 537
Moderator, medbs swore at someone (see above)... I think he should be banned..
- Status
meanreversion
Senior member
- Messages
- 3,398
- Likes
- 537
Seriously, can we please get medbs kicked off t2w, this entire thread really diminishes the quality of the website (and I mean that).
meanreversion
Senior member
- Messages
- 3,398
- Likes
- 537
Come on, be serious, it's beyond a joke now. Time to put the cat out of its misery, purlease!
gamma
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,231
- Likes
- 331
In all honesty I agree you, I would not miss him he is not as funny as the other ones we have had.
meanreversion
Senior member
- Messages
- 3,398
- Likes
- 537
He has no redeeming features. He (or it might be a she)
1. is not funny
2. makes Nick Leeson look like God's gift to trading
3. is outright rude
4. is probably putting bad ideas into people's head with the "100 pct win rate" thing
1. is not funny
2. makes Nick Leeson look like God's gift to trading
3. is outright rude
4. is probably putting bad ideas into people's head with the "100 pct win rate" thing
No stops, went into 1200 or 1300 pip drawdown on 3 or 4 positions, disappeared for 10 days then came back as if nothing ever happened. Someone calculated his drawdown at about 150%, but hes calling new trades.
lol, cheers! As you were, gentlemen....
You: Shut up!
meanreversion
Senior member
- Messages
- 3,398
- Likes
- 537
You realize we all think you're a joke, so why do you continue posting?
He likes to wind poeple up I think.. he's doing a good job too. If he's like my 3 year old, it doesn't work shouting at him as he takes it as a reaction and enjoys it, and thinks "wow that was a good reaction, must try that again...". Be calm and enjoy this experiment, I for one will be genuinely interested to see the result after 3 months, which ever way it goes.
If what all of you are saying is true then in a few months time he should realize that. He probably won't tell us if we all bang on his door...
meanreversion
Senior member
- Messages
- 3,398
- Likes
- 537
I don't know about the winding people up part, as he does occasionally get annoyed.
I think he (or she) enjoys being cyber-bullied, a digital form of masochism.
Then the next question would be - are we guilty in this, in that we give him stick all the time? Are we willing participants?
I think he (or she) enjoys being cyber-bullied, a digital form of masochism.
Then the next question would be - are we guilty in this, in that we give him stick all the time? Are we willing participants?
bbmac
Veteren member
- Messages
- 3,584
- Likes
- 789
On May 5th, Medbs posted the trades above and then on may 7th he posted as above, closing the usdchf in profit...subsequent to this when the gbpusd went seriously offside he has chosen to ignore it, but not ignore the usdchf trade posted on same post on may 5th. Incidently the audusd long was also posted on may 5th and is like the gbpusd trade still open as far as we know. as Medbs has not posted the 'closing position,' choosing to inore this too as it didn't go his way..
bbmac
Veteren member
- Messages
- 3,584
- Likes
- 789
For ther avoidance of any doubt in respect of pips, this is how far the following still open trades went offide at their maximum p[oint of deviation from the opening price
Gbpusd long 5150 -921 pips
audusd long 9103 -1035 pips
eurusd long 2665 and 2595, -525 and - 455 pips respectively,
So these open trades totalled - 2936 pips in the red, accounting for -155.9% of a/c at the leverages ' supposedly used.' Ie: we were belatedly told that the gbpusd and audusd were 'risky trades' so only 3:1 leverage used.) If all trades were taken at at 10:1 leverage as we suspect, the total drawdown in the a/c was -293.6% of a/c.
Gbpusd long 5150 -921 pips
audusd long 9103 -1035 pips
eurusd long 2665 and 2595, -525 and - 455 pips respectively,
So these open trades totalled - 2936 pips in the red, accounting for -155.9% of a/c at the leverages ' supposedly used.' Ie: we were belatedly told that the gbpusd and audusd were 'risky trades' so only 3:1 leverage used.) If all trades were taken at at 10:1 leverage as we suspect, the total drawdown in the a/c was -293.6% of a/c.
gamma
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,231
- Likes
- 331
Yes but no one has a limitless pot.
This is not trading. In trading you have to make a return on a set amount in a set period of time.
what he also chooses to also ignore is the financing cost of overnight positions(if he knows what that is)
This thread should not be taken seriously in fact a warning should be attached to it
Absolutely. I wasn't sticking up for him. I was replying to Lenoarda who was interested in seeing the results in 3 months time.
With a limitless pot (which only demo traders have), and a decision to not take losses, there wont be a conclusion.
Agree. He needs to help his own cause and be a bit more open and descriptive about his trades and account.
meanreversion
Senior member
- Messages
- 3,398
- Likes
- 537
Every day that this thread continues and medbs persists, the integrity of t2w disappears down the plug hole.
- Status
