I see what it is you’re doing. Let’s take EJ as you like to call it.
At 07:14 post #14505 you suggest you’d be looking to buy above 30 / 35 without specifying which of those levels would cause you to enter.
At 08:55 post #14511 you’re “still bearish”.
Nothing about EJ in the interim.
12:57 post #14534 lo and behold, you’re suddenly already long EJ without specifying your entry at the time you claim you took it.
No other comments about dipping in or out until your post at 15:41 post #14541 where you attempt to build provenance by referring back to an older post (which refers back to an older post – always a good strategy to deter a lazy auditor) and you tell us you’ve managed to sit on the entire run up without being shaken out of any of the at least three places which would normally have seen you running for cover.
" You must think we’re all really stupid. "
You've got to laugh at some of the posters on here. You accuse F. of treating everyone as stupid !!! Let's have a look at some of your posts shall we.......
" The paradox is those that know all this stuff, who could just have easily written what I wrote, those that need it the least or not at all, are the very ones that will have read it right to the end. Because that's their mindset - there might be something more to learn. That's my mindset too. I even read the idiots' posts too. No payoff yet, but you never know... "
Last edited by PieterSteidelmayer; Mar 24, 2014 at 4:14pm. "
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splitlink
II enjoyed the read. A bit acerbic, we are not all stupid but I do see where you are coming from.
" I don't think you're stupid splitlink, but I was just going with the balance of probabilities. "
Quote:
Originally Posted by PieterSteidelmayer
For the avoidance of confusion, I know splitlink isn't stupid. Far from it.
" The balance of probabilities was aimed at the 99% who are. "
This is so hypocritical !!! Why can't we all just stay on the threads that we believe in and let's all just get on with it !
