End of the neo-cons??

bbmac

bbmac

Veteren member
Messages
3,584
Likes
789
The neo-con project is a long term one. they have hit bumps in the road before and fully expected the collateral damage so far incurred. Never before have the puppet-masters found such a willing stooge though...as George Bush Jnr.

The visable puppet-masters, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Boulton, Pearle and Wolfowitz have all been neutralised by events, and they did not figure on the utter stupidity of their 'stooge.'


Cheney's influence is far less than in Bush's first term, Boulton had no chance of senate approval for the job at the U.n and has gone, Rumsfeld has gone, Pearle is pretty much unwelcome in the 2nd term Bush Whitehouse and Wolfowitz is in big trouble and likely to have to resign from the World Bank.

There is no appetite to take on Iran, (other than Olmert being replaced by Netanyahu in Israel and taking unilateral action,) Iraq is a quagmire, and continues to haemorage domestic support from Bush who doesn't have a clue how to kick start the Israel-Palestinian process let alone his wider middle - east policy. He is very likely to be the most unpopular President ever to leave office.

Gulianni relying on his 9/11 reputation looks unlikley to beat Clinton or even Obama in 2008, particularly if the current U.s economic slowdown turns into a recession.

So, the question is...Is this stage of the great neo-con project over??
 
bbmac said:
The neo-con project is a long term one. they have hit bumps in the road before and fully expected the collateral damage so far incurred. Never before have the puppet-masters found such a willing stooge though...as George Bush Jnr.

The visable puppet-masters, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Boulton, Pearle and Wolfowitz have all been neutralised by events, and they did not figure on the utter stupidity of their 'stooge.'


Cheney's influence is far less than in Bush's first term, Boulton had no chance of senate approval for the job at the U.n and has gone, Rumsfeld has gone, Pearle is pretty much unwelcome in the 2nd term Bush Whitehouse and Wolfowitz is in big trouble and likely to have to resign from the World Bank.

There is no appetite to take on Iran, (other than Olmert being replaced by Netanyahu in Israel and taking unilateral action,) Iraq is a quagmire, and continues to haemorage domestic support from Bush who doesn't have a clue how to kick start the Israel-Palestinian process let alone his wider middle - east policy. He is very likely to be the most unpopular President ever to leave office.

Gulianni relying on his 9/11 reputation looks unlikley to beat Clinton or even Obama in 2008, particularly if the current U.s economic slowdown turns into a recession.

So, the question is...Is this stage of the great neo-con project over??
Click to expand...

From what i've heard, to discuss the possibility of either republican or democrat presidential candidates being any type of solution is pointless.

Presidents are nothing but puppet figureheads, with the real power lurking in the shadows. Presidents seem to have little input themselves.

Both parties are controlled by the New World Order pushing central bankers and big corporations. Both parties are firmly routed within the US military industrial complex.

Similar to in the UK, the US left-right paradigm is a myth. Both parties are opposite sides of the same coin, two different management teams bidding for the same contract.
There is an illusion of choice, with minor differences in policy.

The US bought and paid for establishment media play their part, and are not giving any attention to Ron Paul, despite the fact that he has topped polls.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2007/080507yahoocensor.htm
 
Last edited:
 
fibonelli said:
Exactly, you can see who's jumping on the P-R-S bandwagon.
Click to expand...

Hi fib

I'm double confused now, because i don't know what AGW or P-R-S stand for :confused: :LOL: ;) ?

Perhaps you could clarify for us?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Atilla said:
Scary to think this guy is the leader of the World's current super power though. :-0
Click to expand...
It's been suggested that it's an act - he's intelligent but acts stupid, maybe on somone's orders. It seems more likely that he's just dyslexic though. It runs in families, affects men particularly, and his brother is dyslexic as well as Bush Snr maybe. On that basis it's mocking the afflicted, a very un-American thing to do. Still, he'll be gone soon anyway.
 
blackcab said:
It's been suggested that it's an act - he's intelligent but acts stupid, maybe on somone's orders. It seems more likely that he's just dyslexic though. It runs in families, affects men particularly, and his brother is dyslexic as well as Bush Snr maybe. On that basis it's mocking the afflicted, a very un-American thing to do. Still, he'll be gone soon anyway.
Click to expand...

He may well be dyslexic but it doesn't exclude him from being a pampered spoon fed and propped up dimwit. He is smart in all the selfish ways of an egomaniac who thinks he has some devine purpose in life doing Gods work just like Bin laden git.

Simple person yes, smart person no, good person probably - to his family.

Looking at Katrina issue (5 day response to crises as he was too busy playing golf) wall repair budget of $95m was cut the year before to finance war in Iraq) all the holidays in office and what has he has achieved - BofP, budget defecit, inflationary pressures, value of dollar?

It may be un-American to not support the troops in Iraq but even there Bush and the republicans are out of touch with the people they are supposed to represent. They know better because they have devine guidance. :LOL:

History will judge in due course. :)
 
bbmac said:
The neo-con project is a long term one. they have hit bumps in the road before and fully expected the collateral damage so far incurred. Never before have the puppet-masters found such a willing stooge though...as George Bush Jnr.

The visable puppet-masters, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Boulton, Pearle and Wolfowitz have all been neutralised by events, and they did not figure on the utter stupidity of their 'stooge.'


Cheney's influence is far less than in Bush's first term, Boulton had no chance of senate approval for the job at the U.n and has gone, Rumsfeld has gone, Pearle is pretty much unwelcome in the 2nd term Bush Whitehouse and Wolfowitz is in big trouble and likely to have to resign from the World Bank.

There is no appetite to take on Iran, (other than Olmert being replaced by Netanyahu in Israel and taking unilateral action,) Iraq is a quagmire, and continues to haemorage domestic support from Bush who doesn't have a clue how to kick start the Israel-Palestinian process let alone his wider middle - east policy. He is very likely to be the most unpopular President ever to leave office.

Gulianni relying on his 9/11 reputation looks unlikley to beat Clinton or even Obama in 2008, particularly if the current U.s economic slowdown turns into a recession.

So, the question is...Is this stage of the great neo-con project over??
Click to expand...

Anyway, I want to know more about bbmac.

His last post prior to this was 19/10/2005.
He has been a member since January 2003, has only made 107 posts in total.
Hasn't replied to this thread since it was opened.
Started the conspiracies thread, and only posted one follow-up post.

Whats going on :confused: :rolleyes: ;) :) :?:
 
Last edited:
JTrader said:
Anyway, I want to know more about bbmac.

His last post prior to this was 19/10/2005.
He has been a member since January 2003, has only made 107 posts in total.
Hasn't replied to this thread since it was opened.
Started the conspiracies thread, and only posted one follow-up post.

Whats going on :confused: :rolleyes: ;) :) :?:
Click to expand...

I don't know about much about bbmac but his post is very much on the ball. Or should I say I find interesting and concur with him.

His posts average just over 1 a month.

As for my view to his question, NO it's not over until the US pulls out it's troops from Iraq, Germany and decides not to put up any missiles in Europe pointing at Russia. Problem is what will it do about China?

The US needs a new enemy to justify it's muscle and suspect Latin America will be the next geo pos on it's radar once it gives up the ghost on the ME. We are not likely to see that for another 20 years imo.
 
Atilla said:
He may well be dyslexic but it doesn't exclude him from being a pampered spoon fed and propped up dimwit. He is smart in all the selfish ways of an egomaniac who thinks he has some devine purpose in life doing Gods work just like Bin laden git.

Simple person yes, smart person no, good person probably - to his family.

Looking at Katrina issue (5 day response to crises as he was too busy playing golf) wall repair budget of $95m was cut the year before to finance war in Iraq) all the holidays in office and what has he has achieved - BofP, budget defecit, inflationary pressures, value of dollar?

It may be un-American to not support the troops in Iraq but even there Bush and the republicans are out of touch with the people they are supposed to represent. They know better because they have devine guidance. :LOL:

History will judge in due course. :)
Click to expand...

hmm, tell you what though, he has got that film star look to his face and he is always clean shaven. There is a subtle "protection sureity" radiating from his aura's , kind of like an american wild west gunslinger, with a controlable psychosis. These are no band thing, we could argue ,to have in a pistols at dawn situation. Kind of like Yul Brynner when he played that robot in that great film West World.

I'll say this to Mr Bush though, he should do as he think he must. But of course so should everyone else too.

As for supporting troops in Iraq etc, why not bang the message to all these wonderful world leaders, that we think it a good idea to support all life.

huh. how easy's that ?

Has anyone sent an email to the whitehouse yet airing ones complaints?
 
JTrader said:
Hi fib

I'm double confused now, because i don't know what AGW or P-R-S stand for :confused: :LOL: ;) ?

Perhaps you could clarify for us?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

Hi JT,
P-R-S stands for Problem-Reaction-Solution (see my previous post) and AGW is Anthropogenic Global Warming aka Man Made Global Warming.
 
JTrader said:
Gotcha! Thanks.

What about AGW. (A)Global Warming, but what does A stand for?
Click to expand...

Got it!

The case for anthropogenic global warming necessarily rests upon the presumptions that (1) the sun is an isotropic and isochronous radiator, and (2) that the energy density of space, filled with electromagnetic radiation across the entire electromagnetic spectrum from trillions of cosmic radiators, is a constant.

http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/Anthropogenic+global+warming
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BSD
I have to give George Bush credit for this: NO to Israel bombing Iran
Replies
2
Views
2K
Scorpius
Scorpius
bbmac
Obama and the Future
2 3 4
Replies
69
Views
12K
abbeyandriana
A
C
In This Thread, i post pics from the 2004 San Fran anti-war rally
Replies
3
Views
2K
Car Key Boi
C
T2W Bot
FAQ What are the pros & cons of Spreadbetting versus CFDs
Replies
15
Views
37K
marcela 2020
M
S
The end of the world as we know it?
3 4 5
Replies
87
Views
15K
bonsai
B
Top