Are you suggesting that you're just giving direction now and I pick the entries and exits? I'm not assumign anyone is stupid, I'm evaluating the signals.
Look. Either your calls/signals have merit on their own or they don't. I'm following them closely, and I invite anyone to double check my results.
The jury is still out on whether there is an edge from following your calls. You have more winners than losers so far, but not the 90% win rate you claim (63% by my results). I think all of your winners are less than your initial risk, and many are less than half your initial risk. So while you did have 4 out of 4 wins today, lets put that in perspective. You're ahead on pips, but a follower is nowhere near the gains of 455 pips this week that you claim. Even after todays gains, I still have you at just over 50 pips ahead, and just over 2% ahead, which is effectively less than one trade going wrong. You had 4 full size (3%) losses yesterday.
There is ambiguity about some of your calls, you post that it's closed then say that you have part position still running. I post I wasn't filled, yet apparently all your students were filled. This means you then have ambiguity about entries and averaging in.
There are many calls and averaging in levels which I know nobody following that call could have achieved, or which are after the fact.
You fail to be clear about how you are calculating your pip gain, and what you have done when only partially filled. All of this is unclear. My results may not be your results, but they are at least clear in entry and exit, so I'll stick to that way of doing it, or we can stop here.
Overall you've been doing ok and made some good calls, but I wish you would stop moving the goalposts, or making claims that are far off what is being achieved.
