I've lost track of what you all did. As far as I can see , the flat bottom triangle that broke to the upside was a perfectly good long entry. That fact that it didn't go, is irrelevant. What is important is that you saw why and when it was time to get out.. First, the target was 495- never made it first time, or second time. It's valid to wait for the anticipated pullback, but there was a short term ND- the ones that Mom likes. It certainly was a very convincing break especially as there was the 100MA pullback.
Talking about the 100MA, If you got in earlier on the D top short, then the 100MA rules SHOULD have kept you in that triangle break as it only made 9 points above it. But then again, that PD bottom and triangle should have made you cover... tough decisions. None of them wrong.
If you needed convincing, that breakout was really weak on RSI strength- looking at that, look at all the early drops... They were all stronger that the rises, except the first one from 480 to 520.
That bottom- recognise the 4 slope change? Confirmation from ES vol.- Short term divergence and then a blow off bottom at 2.5x vol.
The Inv. H&S off the bottom had a target of T1, easily passed, leading the way to a nice rise, being held on course by the 100MA and some weak RSI strength on the drop. Then on to the 3 PK ND top across 45 mins for an out.
And what about that snap breakout triangle? Target 502!