ChartMan said:
If you can equate that to a risk of less than 1% of capital per trade, you will stand a reasonable chance of success.
The risk on this trade was 20 points below the 100mA at entry ( 9140) that's 30 points. at £2 a point that's £60 risk, so your capital needs to be > £6000. at £4 a pint you need to be looking at £12K+. So at £2 a point and 60 in the bag, you made £120 and 2% capital growth. You don't have to be a mathmatical genius to work out that if you can do this regularly, you stand to make a reasonble income/living.
Try the same thing/numbers with just £2K capital and you'll soon be needing to top the account up to cover your losses.
Hi CM,
I think I see what you're getting at here.
Let me try a couple of simple examples....
1.
You have £3000 capital.
You're looking to place a trade with a risk of 30 points.
You consider taking a position at £1 per point.
This is OK since your system allows you to risk up to 1%
(30/1000) of your capital.
You exit 60 points to the good :-0
So you risked 1% to make 2% (60/3000)
Your risk to reward ratio was 1:2 (1:3 would be safer still)
2.
You only have £1000 capital
You place the same trade, risking 30 points.
You take the position at £1 per point.
This is bad news because you are risking 3% (30/1000) of
your capital.
You exit 60 points to the good- but it was emotionally a bit of a sweat to stay in; you were tempted to pull out at 20 points up.
Still you made it but you risked a huge 3% to make the 60 points. You are 6% (60/1000) up.
But, this was still a 1:2 risk reward ratio wasn't it?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What I can't quite get my head round is that one's system can't 'know' how much capital you have so the increased likelyhood of failure for trading with low capital must be due to:
1. Not being able to cover the worst losing run.
2. Allowing emotion to influence your decisions as you risk larger and larger percentages of remaining capital.
3. Being forced to place stops so tight that they get triggerd every time.
4. Something I haven't thought of.
Is the above just rubbish, have I missed the point, maybe even THE point?? :cheesy:
Sorry if it's a bit basic for some.
Best Regards,
Neil