Fundamental Analysis UK Housing Boom – Is the Party Over?

Recently the IMF said that the UK's property was overvalued and this could result in a spectacular slump. House prices in the US have slowed down considerably since 2005.

The UK avoided the Recession in 2001 when many countries went into deep recession. Post 9/11 the UK interest rates were at the lowest for many decades, this resulted in a boom in the UK housing market as the cost of mortgages was at its lowest. The low cost of borrowing also saw a boom in the buy to let market with many investors having a big portfolio of properties.

Not only was the UK government on a spending spree but also the UK consumer, due to the easy availability of credit. Currently the UK personal debt level has exceeded more than £1 trillion. It is expected that we could see a significant rise in insolvencies during 2008. The "time bomb" is ticking and could explode at any time; it could be triggered by any of the shocks to the economy. The Northern Rock fiasco was just the first such trigger, which resulted in savers withdrawing over £14 billion from the ailing Rock - no doubt the next 12 months we will witness more such triggers, which will dent overall consumer confidence. This could eventually lead to a big fall in the house prices.

Many "experts" feel that 2008 could see further rises in house prices, and some optimistic forecast has been put at over a 10% increase. Housing demand is influenced by the "feel good factor" resulting into the expectation that the house prices will continue to rise. Some of the reasons for a boom in house prices are;
  • Cheap mortgage rates post 9/11
  • Availability of easy credit
  • Speculation of ongoing price increases
  • Buy to let investors having large portfolio of properties
  • Amateur investors now joining the buy to let bandwagon

The worrying part is when amateur investors join the party; it's likely that we may have seen the peak! One can see similarities with the technology stock boom of 2000. Many investors bought at the peak and after several years they have yet to recoup their losses.

The past year has seen many amateur investors venture into the buy to let market for the first time. This has meant that they have had to buy at the peak, with the mortgage rates almost doubling in the past 5 years.

Currently prices are being supported by the expectations that they will continue to rise, and when this increase fails to materialise the bubble could burst. The house price inflation has been at its fastest this decade as can be seen from the following graph; and since 1995 we have not seen a dip in prices, it has just gone up in one straight line!

Image1-127.jpg


In addition, there are other serious issues with the economy which could trigger a sharp correction, not only in house prices but also the stock market. Some of the disturbing triggers will be;</span />
  • Lenders offering loans of up to 5 times multiples to salary, thus borrowers are overstretching themselves.</span />
  • Increases in mortgage rates have yet to have an impact and often this takes time to react. The mortgage rates have nearly doubled since 2002.</span />
  • Nearly 1 million Britons now own a second home, often as a buy to let investment. When the downturn in economy comes, panic is likely to set in amongst the buy to let investors, which would result in the market being flooded with house for sale.
  • The US sub-prime mortgage crisis also poses more risks for the UK's banking system. In the US the crisis has lead to plunging property prices, creating a loss of consumer confidence with billions of dollars in loss.
  • UK Job prospects are worsening, with many economist predicting unemployment to rise to 1.8 million+. The banking & financial sector has been a big driver for employment growth. Many firms in the housing market; this could result into deteriorating earnings and leading to staff cutbacks.
  • Consumer spending could see a slow down when faced with deteriorating economic and job conditions. Once again this would affect consumer spending, thus lower earnings.
  • Inflationary pressures are driven by high commodity prices, as demand from emerging economies like India and China continue to increase. This not only has an impact on the monetary policies like the interest rates but will have significant impact on earnings, which could lead to a big fall in stock market.

Buy-to-let bubble:
Is the party over? So far the landlords have had it easy, the cheap mortgage rates ensured that the rent covered the mortgage repayments and they benefited from the significant capital appreciation of their portfolio. It surely has been the best investment strategy for the past decade, as many investors have made fortunes and many have "retired" young.

Currently it is estimated that there are over a million buy to let mortgages, and landlords are now feeling the pinch. Past 2 years has seen significant rise in mortgage repayments and we are now seeing signs of price increase slowing down. The rents have not kept pace with outgoings, thus landlord profits have gone down. In some cases landlords are losing on their portfolio. Some areas in the UK have seen an oversupply of buy to let properties resulting into falling yields.

Although year on year prices rose by nearly 5% to December 2007, but the house prices fell for a second consecutive month in December according to Nationwide building society. New mortgages on a buy to let are also slowing, with many lenders now seeking up to 30% deposit and also a requirement that the rent on the property equates to 125% of monthly mortgage payment.

Unless the investor has a larger deposit the rental yield may be insufficient to cover the cost of the mortgage and with no expectations of a capital growth, you are likely to see significant drop in the buy-to-let mortgages. This could even result in many existing landlords starting to liquidate their portfolios. The only incentive to retain portfolios is the expectation of further capital gains. If this expectation evaporates and with falling yield, then there would be no point in buy to let investments.

Newer entrants to the buy to let market could soon face going into negative equity as soon as we start seeing declines in the prices. Furthermore, should the banks suffer to the extent of the housing bust, the fallout would be astronomical!

Changes to the Capital Gains could also contribute to the housing crash. The tax on property gains has been cut from 40% to 18% effective from 1st April 2008. So those investors who are sitting on fat profits would be tempted to lock in gains and also benefit from the lower tax.

Housing Repossessions
2007 has seen a significant rise in home repossessions, and it is expected that this figure will increase considerably in 2008. Rising property repossessions normally spell bad news for the property market creating a supply of houses, which are normally sold below market prices and this can dent confidence.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) has warned that the number of home repossessions is set to soar to levels not seen since the housing crash of the 1990s. It is also expected that there will be an increase in mortgage repayment arrears in the coming year.

Having said that, the current situation is very different from the 1990s. Firstly in the 90s interest rates were very high and peaked at 16%. We are probably unlikely to see huge scale cases of negative equity like we had in the 90s, due to the huge equity homeowners are sitting on at the moment.

What to do - Action Points?
  • If you are a homeowner and if you are contemplating selling your home, then the time to act is now,given that sharp falls may just be round the corner unless the government can delay the inevitable by aggressive reduction of interest rates.
  • Cash is king - with so much uncertainty, undoubtedly cash is king. Fixed interest and government bonds are increasingly becoming popular.
  • Stock market investment - Although we have seen healthy gains in the markets worldwide, longer term it offers good opportunity. Many analysts are calling for sharp falls in the markets and this should provide a good opportunity of bargain hunting. Emerging markets should also offer a good opportunity in the event of a market correction.

Conclusion
Just as in year 2000, when we saw the NASDAQ stock market boom, we are now seeing some similarities - irrational exuberance in the housing market.

During the NASDAQ boom, we saw many amateur investors jump into the market at the peak, we are now experiencing a similar situation. Many amateur investors are jumping into the buy to let market.

As with all market activity, prices do not go up in one straight line and you will always have price retracement, the question is how big the retracement will be? There is no doubt that a significant house price correction is on the cards, the only question remains is when? It is a case of any one of the triggers to set in - as soon as the first domino falls, panic will set in resulting into significant declines in house prices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
what a joke, those morons are going to be very short of interviews when this fire gets so hot that we see huge well known companies and even banks go under
 
The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) said the number of properties sold has dropped to its lowest level since records began in 1978. Estate agents are selling a average of 1 property a month.

It blamed the lack of affordable mortgages available to home owners for the collapse in transactions.

How about the lack of affordable houses/flats available. If we knock another 10/20% of prices then people will be able to pay 6.5% to borrow money.
 
The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) said the number of properties sold has dropped to its lowest level since records began in 1978. Estate agents are selling a average of 1 property a month.

It blamed the lack of affordable mortgages available to home owners for the collapse in transactions.

How about the lack of affordable houses/flats available. If we knock another 10/20% of prices then people will be able to pay 6.5% to borrow money.

Estate Agents hardly showing any intelligence there at all. As you rightly say, the housing market would be moving perfectly well if Sellers were more realistic with their prices. Once they've come off another 20% or so buyers will return and Estate Agents will make sales again!

What I never understand is why Estate Agents are not more aggressive with their pricing. It doesn't really matter to them whether Prices are rising or falling, they just need volume.

At the moment I am looking to buy (for the right price) and am amazed the Agencies I speak to seem hell bent on waiting for the market to come back to them. They need to be making the market not hoping to ride it.
 
Last edited:
at least 90% of the estate agents have not got a clue about affordability, supply/demand,economics etc, they are sales people after all. The last down turn was 18 years ago which means estate agents under the age of 36 do not even know what falling house prices and recessions are all about.
 
The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) said the number of properties sold has dropped to its lowest level since records began in 1978. Estate agents are selling a average of 1 property a month.

It blamed the lack of affordable mortgages available to home owners for the collapse in transactions.

How about the lack of affordable houses/flats available. If we knock another 10/20% of prices then people will be able to pay 6.5% to borrow money.

It blamed the lack of affordable mortgages available to home owners for the collapse in transactions.

That sounds like vested interest and political Yukspeak which roughly translated means: People can only borrow what's sensible (by today's standards) and can no longer make false declarations, and all the lenders have mysteriously become "responsible" overnight.



In my area (Northants / Leics) there's a stalemate - classic Bull / Bear standoff - so nothing's happening apart from the estate agents presumably looking to see if there's more money in selling double glazing / s/h cars / solar panels etc etc.

Sellers here are still not being realistic. Houses that before the "Credit Crunch" were over-priced by up to 10% were not selling, but did so quite easily if/when the seller knocked the 10% off. The same houses now, are asking what was a realistic price well over a year ago. Dream on!

However, a very few sellers realise the game's up and have reduced asking prices to about 15% below peak presumably with the aim of achieving a sale 20% below. But there's no movement - and why should there be when we don't know if we're anywhere near the bottom?

Buyers (those that are left) are very sensibly waiting and maybe some have even realised that you can't call the bottom until after the event. And of course there's the stamp duty fiasco - if you'd arranged a committee of the brightest and finest you couldn't have come up with an idea more likely to stifle the housing market than the recent "leak" that Alistair's thinking about a stamp-duty holiday. I just couldn't believe it (maybe I can though - it's just like the dying days of the Major government).


The housing market needs to correct (ie prices go down) and as Vince Cable has said, let the market do the work. Maybe people will now buy houses primarily as somewhere to live rather than as an investment (leave that to those who know what they're doing and most of whom got out of the present debacle ages ago before the bubble burst).

In the short term (next 2-5 years ?) house prices should reduce / stabilise at more sensible levels - especially with the gloomy forecasts for the UK economy. And what about Black Swans like South Ossetia - though this is probably a grey swan? When this is complete I've no doubt the "stupid-cycle" will restart. it will be driven (as always) by:

1. Shortage of housing - we have been building too little and a lot of that wasn't appropriate.
2. Shortage of land (they don't make it any more) subject always, of course, to political interference.
3. The British dislike of rental and obsession with property ownership (note how our law is always derived from property rights since time immemorial: the Squire's land was always more important than the serf's well-being was it not?)
4. Vested interests who see it as a chance to make a bob or two (and they give us traders a bad moral press in some quarters!)

Buyers - wait your opportunity then pounce. Sellers - get real. Just like trading. :)
 
Last edited:
How about the lack of affordable houses/flats available. If we knock another 10/20% of prices then people will be able to pay 6.5% to borrow money.

I don't agree with this as the only reason. If buyers have got used to not having any deposit to buy a house and now mortgage companies are demanding that they do then why would any price reduction change this as they still wont have any deposit ?


Paul
 
I don't agree with this as the only reason. If buyers have got used to not having any deposit to buy a house and now mortgage companies are demanding that they do then why would any price reduction change this as they still wont have any deposit ?


Paul


If buyers can get used to not having any deposit to buy a house why shouldn't they get used to having to save for one?

What goes up must eventually come down if it's based on planet earth. :cheesy:
 
I don't agree with this as the only reason. If buyers have got used to not having any deposit to buy a house and now mortgage companies are demanding that they do then why would any price reduction change this as they still wont have any deposit ?


Paul

trader333,
I am not saying it is the only reasons but it is the main one. Recessions do not cause house prices to fall but overpriced house prices do cause recessions.If house prices were 20% cheaper their would be less chance of the banks having losses from bad mortgages,they would not have to be so risk adverse. Everyone that has bought a house in the last couple of years who has not put down a 10% deposit has overpaid and is now spending to much of their monthly take home paid servicing this debt. If you cannot afford to put down a deposit you cannot afford to buy a house/flat, it's as simple as that.
 
If house prices were 20% cheaper their would be less chance of the banks having losses from bad mortgages,they would not have to be so risk adverse

Oil prices have a much bigger impact in causing recession than do house prices. Also the bad debts have not been caused by house price inflation in the UK but because UK banks purchased sub-prime debts from the US. If UK prices were 20% cheaper it would have no impact at all on the current crisis caused by buying all that bad debt from the US. It is this reason why so many banks are making astronomic losses and almost nothing to do with bad debt from UK mortgages.


Paul
 
Oil prices have a much bigger impact in causing recession than do house prices. Also the bad debts have not been caused by house price inflation in the UK but because UK banks purchased sub-prime debts from the US. If UK prices were 20% cheaper it would have no impact at all on the current crisis caused by buying all that bad debt from the US. It is this reason why so many banks are making astronomic losses and almost nothing to do with bad debt from UK mortgages.


Paul


Oil prices cause inflationary pressures not recessions.

House prices cause wealth affect where people feel richer than they really are by virtue of their assets. Fall in house prices will also reduce peoples wealth affect and thus expenditures.

Housing is the biggest multiplier and income generator. If housing transactions speed up so does expenditure. If it slows likewise transactions decline.

Bad debt is what ever liability anybody has taken on by bringing their purchase decision forward by borrowing and not saving.

How does UK banks purchase of sub-prime debts from the US explain mortgage repossesions going up by 47% ie people who can't meet their liabilities?
 
Oil prices have a much bigger impact in causing recession than do house prices. Also the bad debts have not been caused by house price inflation in the UK but because UK banks purchased sub-prime debts from the US. If UK prices were 20% cheaper it would have no impact at all on the current crisis caused by buying all that bad debt from the US. It is this reason why so many banks are making astronomic losses and almost nothing to do with bad debt from UK mortgages.


Paul

Trader333,
You cannot be serious, the banks/financial sector has lost $600 billion dollars from the world housing market turndown and $0 dollars from the high oil prices but you think the high oil price was a bigger reason for the recession we are about to have. It's the supply and demand of money that makes the world turn not the price of oil.
 
Oil prices have a much bigger impact in causing recession than do house prices. Also the bad debts have not been caused by house price inflation in the UK but because UK banks purchased sub-prime debts from the US. If UK prices were 20% cheaper it would have no impact at all on the current crisis caused by buying all that bad debt from the US. It is this reason why so many banks are making astronomic losses and almost nothing to do with bad debt from UK mortgages.


Paul

market is all about sentiment! - it can change at anytime. Markets acts without reasoning. If the sentiment was bullish then even teh current credit crunch problem would not be an issue!

As Geaorge bush said, that traders and investors got drunk on the up move and now they have a hangover!
 
market is all about sentiment! - it can change at anytime. Markets acts without reasoning. If the sentiment was bullish then even teh current credit crunch problem would not be an issue!

As Geaorge bush said, that traders and investors got drunk on the up move and now they have a hangover!

Expectations theory can explain some of the move but not the whole...

Bullish sentiment has to be based on real substance somewhere along the line...

It's a little like trying to tickle one self.

Or it is like our current government removing any meaningful statistics from the measure of inflation like fuel and mortgage payments.

Or Bloomberg reporting sales have gone up when in fact they have fallen but the price of oil has gone up and petrol sales are included in retail sales... That's very cheap low down and dirty...

All these news stories to give the consumer that feel good factor have been tried but there is no more juice left in the tank...

Markets are about Supply and Demand and equilibrium price. You might buck the day of reckoning today but tomorrow it will catch up with you.

I would focus on the facts on the ground rather than expectations and sentiments. (y)
 
It's the supply and demand of money that makes the world turn not the price of oil.

Absolutely true. But both are ultimately controlled by the same group of people and it is they that really make the world go around
 
LOL. This thread has a lot of assertions even in this last page. So, for fun, here's a go.

"the same group of people" Stuart, is like the strong theory of advertising: people do what the advs say and although its fun its not all that rational.

"Bullish sentiment has to be based on real substance somewhere along the line," Atilla, although usually true is not always so. The Big Lie has a long history of driving things especially when everyone gets into it (it's different this time).

"Oil prices cause inflationary pressures not recessions," Atilla, is not true if the inflationary results help to develop a recession. Personally I think that Oil prices were just another contributory effect at the end of this silly cycle but those things that **** up the business help the recession.

"a much bigger impact in causing recession than do house prices," Trader333. Recessions follow overexhuberance (usually) and the expansion of credit and the lemming like rush to use it were definitely oe. In the UK it was obvious. In Aus they're just coming out of denial.

But in the end the whole world is full of people who are much more comfortable blaming someone else for their problems - and political machines that benefit from encouraging that soft form of xenophobia. Thank god for the markets and trading.

Cheers :)
 
Or it is like our current government removing any meaningful statistics from the measure of inflation like fuel and mortgage payments.

Before I say this I will admit that I'm no expert in economics and I hope I'm not saying something completely stupid but.....


.... I always assumed the reason mortgage payments were not used was because if they were included in the calculation for inflation this would produce a positive feed back loop that would cause inflation/interest rates to ramp up to infinity ??????



dd
 
I didn't say that current oil prices increases have caused this because we have not seen the effect yet of the latest price increases filter through. Most of the economists I know think that oil prices will have a bigger impact on recession than house prices. But what caused the recession in the 1970s ? It wasn't house prices it was Oil. The 47% increase in repossessions is still nowhere near (in absolute numbers) than the repossessions from the 1990s and there are more than double the number of mortgages.

If UK banks had not purchased sub-prime debt then they would not be suffering the effects of having done so and the UK market would have been much more healthy as a result. Northern Rock who bought more of this than anyone else is a classic example.

Where economics are concerned everyone has a different view including governments. As this is getting heated I will leave well alone.


Paul
 
I didn't say that current oil prices increases have caused this because we have not seen the effect yet of the latest price increases filter through. Most of the economists I know think that oil prices will have a bigger impact on recession than house prices. But what caused the recession in the 1970s ? It wasn't house prices it was Oil. The 47% increase in repossessions is still nowhere near (in absolute numbers) than the repossessions from the 1990s and there are more than double the number of mortgages.

If UK banks had not purchased sub-prime debt then they would not be suffering the effects of having done so and the UK market would have been much more healthy as a result. Northern Rock who bought more of this than anyone else is a classic example.

Where economics are concerned everyone has a different view including governments. As this is getting heated I will leave well alone.


Paul

Trader333,

But you did say

Oil prices have a much bigger impact in causing recession than do house prices. Also the bad debts have not been caused by house price inflation in the UK but because UK banks purchased sub-prime debts from the US. If UK prices were 20% cheaper it would have no impact at all on the current crisis caused by buying all that bad debt from the US. It is this reason why so many banks are making astronomic losses and almost nothing to do with bad debt from UK mortgages.

You said this after I said that overpriced house prices were the main reason for recessions.

Have a look at House price graph from 1957 - UK Money Saving Guides, Tools and Forums it's the Nationwide house price index from 1957 to 2005. On 4 occasions the average house price has extented above the trend price and on all 4 occassions the world has had a major slow down/recession.
As you will see house prices were over extended between 1971 and 1975 so your statement that oil was the reason for the recession in the 70's might not be correct.

You also said:
If UK banks had not purchased sub-prime debt then they would not be suffering the effects of having done so and the UK market would have been much more healthy as a result. Northern Rock who bought more of this than anyone else is a classic example.

But what is sub-prime Debt, it is derivatives contracts related to mortgages of overpriced houses which people have bought with little or no deposit.House prices all over the world are linked and most countries had overpriced housing. If the UK banks had not got involved in mortgage backed securities house prices would not be this high in the UK now and house prices all over the world would not have got as high as they did. They made billions of pounds when thinks were going up which meant they were more willing to lend money to people who should never been given it.

Northern Rock did not buy sub prime debt they lent 90 to 125% of the overpriced value of houses/flats to people who could not afford them. They financed most of this through the money markets and when the money markets became strickter about who they lent to Northern Rock ran out of money.

Anyway we are all entitled to our opinion but as I see it over priced houses is above oil as a reason for economies having recessions.
 
Top