How do these people read and post so quick

Feb 6, 2004
4,854
778
123
54
uk
#31
The ignore works on the grounds that it is one poster that needs to be ignored. This has been going on for quite a while, and not just ituglobal.

I agree with you about content moderating. That's not the case here. You're missing what is obvious. There is no content here.

Example:
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/trading-psychology/168286-psychology-problem-2.html#post2140594

You may think that's on topic, and not breaching any rules. To me it's obviously nonsense with no content, and isn't related to the topic.

If you were in doubt about it, google the post. You'll find a duplicate here

Page 16 - E_Tra0611

here

Is The FX Markets Scary?

and probably several other places.

P.S. Can a mod please delete these last two links from my post when the penny has dropped

Now this is obvious to many of us, for a long time.
I still say they are sig link carrier posts, the usual ploy is to leave it a few days then drop it in later, if they haven't already been removed of course? kittycriston's posts were usually found also on other boards complete with her ad links.

I guess where i'm coming from is that I believe that there should be a freedom for members to post their view, whether it is rubbish, wrong or whatever. it is a discussion board and members can and should pick up the point and put said member straight. saying that members should have their posts removed because it's deemed devoid of content and just rubbish is the move down the dangerous road, who's going to judge?
 

Lee Shepherd

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2008
2,165
570
123
#33
The ignore works on the grounds that it is one poster that needs to be ignored. This has been going on for quite a while, and not just ituglobal.

I agree with you about content moderating. That's not the case here. You're missing what is obvious. There is no content here.

Example:
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/trading-psychology/168286-psychology-problem-2.html#post2140594

You may think that's on topic, and not breaching any rules. To me it's obviously nonsense with no content, and isn't related to the topic.

If you were in doubt about it, google the post. You'll find a duplicate here

Page 16 - E_Tra0611

here

Is The FX Markets Scary?

and probably several other places.

P.S. Can a mod please delete these last two links from my post when the penny has dropped

Now this is obvious to many of us, for a long time.
Good work there Shakone.

It's obvious then, this person is boosting their Google rank and credibility by linking their own site back to here then their name with various (insignificant) posts by mentioning the name of good reputable sites like T2W.

In other words they're using this place for their own personal gain but not actually contributing anything of any value.

Just constant quick firing of posts without clearly having the time to read the last post plus write let alone reading the thread and relevant posts to it, then moving on to another thread and doing the same.....and all within 30 (ish) seconds.

I suppose I'm not so baffled now as to why this happens. Good to talk about it though but personally feel something more could be done here rather than just talk.
 
Oct 11, 2006
8,072
1,301
223
#35
The ignore list DOESN'T fix the problem in my previous post with the poster posting all down the page. I still see his name and the threads. Same thing.

The minority you speak of is the only group who still posts anything of value here.

Anyway, that's my last word on the subject. I'm not going to beat a dead horse. t2w is lightyears behind the scammers/spammers/linksters/vendors.

Spamming is up, quality content is down, but ignore the minority you speak of.

Peter
I'm sure if we just give them a chance to prove themselves it will all work out well.
 

Attachments

Jan 14, 2003
8,424
870
173
UK
#38
I still say they are sig link carrier posts, the usual ploy is to leave it a few days then drop it in later,
How does that work LM because after a short time posts cannot be edited so they cannot come back later and add something ?
 
Jan 14, 2003
8,424
870
173
UK
#39
It's obvious then, this person is boosting their Google rank and credibility by linking their own site back to here then their name with various (insignificant) posts by mentioning the name of good reputable sites like T2W.
Well that used to work but I thought Google now punishes this kind of activity and there are even companies suing each other over this issue.
 

barjon

Well-known member
May 6, 2003
10,043
1,472
223
78
#40
banned on what grounds?
ah! As reminded by Trader333 this guy received a temporary ban for cut and paste spamming. The latest batch are the same so he's gone now.
 

timsk

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2002
6,787
1,740
223
#43
. . .Its just a copy paste job, they dont have to write anything, you can see this if you google some of the spam posts, the same text appears on other sites as well.

Who can apply?
- Anyone who understands english
- Anyone who can follow instructions
- Anyone who can do basic "copy and paste" work
- Anyone with basic common sense
- Anyone who has time discipline
- Anyone who wants to build a career


Who should not apply?
- Someone who is not serious
- Someone who take things very lightly
- Someone who is unprofessional
- Someone who wants payment before work is delivered

- Someone who cribs all the time
- Someone who gives a lot of excuses

To my way of thinking, the two requirements as to who should and shouldn't apply negate one another. Or am I missing something?
:LOL:
Tim.
 

Lee Shepherd

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2008
2,165
570
123
#44
Rambo35 is back on here again. Lets see how many posts he does this time in quick concession and if he see's his name on this thread and wishes to respond.