Clinton Not Corrupt?

[marsman]

I think the reason why Hillary Clinton had used a private email server is because she made private deals while she was secretary of state.
I think there are many emails of private nature, ie. of her private business to take bribes. I'm 100% sure Clinton is a corrupt person.
One should publish all the emails sent and received over her private email server.

 

[marsman]

Hillary "Pay to Play" Clinton

Hillary "Pay to Play" Clinton is corrupt like hell:
https://www.rt.com/usa/355447-clinton-emails-state-department-foundation/
https://twitter.com/ScottPresler/status/763393092338782209/photo/1

 

[Pat494]

She may have stupidly bent the rules but even so may be preferable to Trump who let's face it is a bit of a whacko. Trump is unpredictable, unprincipled and even dangerous to the welfare of this planet.

I really think the Office of President is too much for a single person and therefore should have reduced executive powers. I don't know what the situation is for America to declare war on others at present. Is it up to Congress or can the POTUS do it himself ?

 

[tomorton]

She may have stupidly bent the rules but even so may be preferable to Trump who let's face it is a bit of a whacko. Trump is unpredictable, unprincipled and even dangerous to the welfare of this planet.

I really think the Office of President is too much for a single person and therefore should have reduced executive powers. I don't know what the situation is for America to declare war on others at present. Is it up to Congress or can the POTUS do it himself ?

As even some US conservatives would admit (see the always entertaining Ben Shapiro) both are bad candidates and the sad remaining question is which will do least lasting damage to the US? On that basis, Trump may be somewhat less dangerous to the country as he is unlikely to be able to pass his own legislative programme and hold onto office, but more dangerous to the Republican party as he is likely to alienate much of their electoral support from the centre-right.

Yes, maybe the Office is too great. Interesting idea. It might take a loose cannon President for it to take popular hold but we may not be far off that eventuality.

 

[timsk]

Yes, the U.S. peeps have to choose between the lesser of two evils: a whacko (to use Pat's expression) in Putin's pocket on the one hand - versus someone more dodgy than a very dodgy thing on the other. Not a great predicament to be in!
Tim.

 

[Pat494]

Yes, the U.S. peeps have to choose between the lesser of two evils: a whacko (to use Pat's expression) in Putin's pocket on the one hand - versus someone more dodgy than a very dodgy thing on the other. Not a great predicament to be in!
Tim.

Because it's mainly based on money it's quite unlikely that a third candidate will emerge as a front runner imho. Although having said that I think even Kermit the frog would stand a chance.

 

[marsman]

I can understand people who have reservations against Trump, because he is not a professional politician.
But Ronald Reagan wasn't either.

But think about this important fact: Trump does not want any confrontation with Russia or China.
It is said that Trump and Putin do understand each other very good.
This is very important, because it simply means peace on earth.

I'm afraid with Clinton and their NeoCon criminals behind her more wars will be started...

 

[Alexander1]

I can understand people who have reservations against Trump, because he is not a professional politician.
But Ronald Reagan wasn't either.

But think about this important fact: Trump does not want any confrontation with Russia or China.
It is said that Trump and Putin do understand each other very good.
This is very important, because it simply means peace on earth.

I'm afraid with Clinton and their NeoCon criminals behind her more wars will be started...

I agree with you, Clinton will be even more wars.

 

[Mr. Charts]

I hope Hillary wins.
Better to have a dodgy President - which the US has survived before - than a Fascist ignoramus.

 

[Atilla]

I can understand people who have reservations against Trump, because he is not a professional politician.
But Ronald Reagan wasn't either.

But think about this important fact: Trump does not want any confrontation with Russia or China.
It is said that Trump and Putin do understand each other very good.
This is very important, because it simply means peace on earth.

I'm afraid with Clinton and their NeoCon criminals behind her more wars will be started...

Agree strongly, as setting up charitable organisations is just another legit way of taking bribes. Business supports your charity and they get the government contract or inside knowledge what ever.

The way US works changing president will not change foreign policy. US has split the globe into 6 command centres and they even can battle against each other with conflicting policies. President's role is eye candy for public. Limited sway comes from party policy imo. Needs big effort for minor change to take place.

As for Trump, why should he be any different to all the others. He uses tax breaks to the max and will use every method at his disposal to further his business and childrens empire. Just a new fresh face. Share the cream at the top.

For mass public to think here is a character who will change all that is just crazy.

Given the way he has gone about preparing organising and working with others to gain this office is it not clear that he is just simply another?

People always want to believe in hope but I fear we have a bigger monster in Trump.

Having said that I'm warming to the guy and probably US can do with a change.

I'm wavering on switching sides. 50/50. Tough call! rolleyes:

 

[piphoe]

I agree with you, Clinton will be even more wars.

i don't think so she learns from her mistakes. she is exceptionally bright. to the extent of the claim she's "dodgy", she's been under attack by the extreme right wing for over 30 yrs. that would give anyone pause..withdraw a bit, speak carefully