N Rothschild
Legendary member
- Messages
- 5,296
- Likes
- 603
cheryl cole could start wars!
cheryl cole could start wars!
Mr. Charts
Legendary member
- Messages
- 7,370
- Likes
- 1,200
Last edited:
Most British people are hard working and have a genuine wish to earn their keep and produce good work.
What Britain are you on about? Most Brits are miserable, moaning, pompus tw*ts...that's why the place is in sh!t state.
What kind of a country am i living in, where my tax is paid to criminals, life long layabouts, sponging immigrants, single mums. No wonder the BNP are gaining popularity, even the mainstream politicians are creaming the system hahaha!
Too many low-lifes in this country, it's a rat infested blocked sewer and it needs flushing out.
This country needs a national game, a new national game, something along the lines of the film, 'Running Man' - Arnie. Get all the scum bags on as contestants, 'doing the run', that'll beat the X Factor viewing figures.
gamma
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,231
- Likes
- 331
Most British people are hard working and have a genuine wish to earn their keep and produce good work.
What kind of a country am i living in, where my tax is paid to criminals, life long layabouts, sponging immigrants, single mums. No wonder the BNP are gaining popularity, even the mainstream politicians are creaming the system hahaha!
Too many low-lifes in this country, it's a rat infested blocked sewer and it needs flushing out.
This country needs a national game, a new national game, something along the lines of the film, 'Running Man' - Arnie. Get all the scum bags on as contestants, 'doing the run', that'll beat the X Factor viewing figures.
But most people are as atilla described them
Old chinese proverb.
What we see in others is only a reflection of our inner soul
Mr. Charts
Legendary member
- Messages
- 7,370
- Likes
- 1,200
HawkTrader
Established member
- Messages
- 620
- Likes
- 130
Couldn't agree with you more. Actually, I've often wondered if the BNP was created by the MI5 or some other intellegence service simply to keep us all arguing amongst ourselfs while, as you say, the real ciminals keep plucking away.
Stranger things have happened.
zupcon
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,162
- Likes
- 322
Atilla
Legendary member
- Messages
- 20,775
- Likes
- 3,976
Not necessarily so.
imo the greatest country until fairly recently anyway was the USA. Still is perhaps if it can pick it self up and reboot from its bootstraps.
Common religion ===== Totaly mixed from all over the world
common race ======== No common race - Europeans, Hispanics, Chinese, Japanese
common culture ====== None - liberty and free spirit is what made it
common language ==== English ???
common history ====== Red Indians and then onslaught of white invaders?
common sense of pride in its past heroes and ethics ===== Very much so I'd say.
Atilla
Legendary member
- Messages
- 20,775
- Likes
- 3,976
To a large extent they are also jealous of anybody who is not of the superior Aryan race but can run, talk and think faster than they can. It is much worse if they have more money than they have being non-white...
Mr. Charts
Legendary member
- Messages
- 7,370
- Likes
- 1,200
"imo the greatest country until fairly recently anyway was the USA"
oooo...errrr now wait for the anti-American diatribes to start
I agree with you, whatever its faults, the USA is probably the best country, though I'm very sad not to say England is. We've been ruled by socialist morons for too long and that's taken its toll
oooo...errrr now wait for the anti-American diatribes to start
I agree with you, whatever its faults, the USA is probably the best country, though I'm very sad not to say England is. We've been ruled by socialist morons for too long and that's taken its toll
Mr. Charts
Legendary member
- Messages
- 7,370
- Likes
- 1,200
Yep, the politics of envy and mean spiritedness and low self-esteem breeds hatred.
Richard
Atilla
Legendary member
- Messages
- 20,775
- Likes
- 3,976
"imo the greatest country until fairly recently anyway was the USA"
oooo...errrr now wait for the anti-American diatribes to start
I agree with you, whatever its faults, the USA is probably the best country, though I'm very sad not to say England is. We've been ruled by socialist morons for too long and that's taken its toll
Common religion ===== C of E, Protestants, Roman Catholics & other
common race ======== No single common race imo - See article below...
common culture ====== Multi-ethnic - Cool Britania imo - Like the Star Trek Enterprise
common language ==== English
common history ====== Onslaught of various invaders and conquest ruling the waves?
common sense of pride in its past heroes and ethics ===== Very much so I'd say. A very Rich history.
Here is something of the web...
race relations. A thorough survey of race relations in Britain would demand a history of the British Isles, since one of its persistent themes has been the interplay of the native peoples, the intervention of Romans, Saxons, Danes, and Normans, and the reception of Jews, Palatines, Huguenots, and, after the Second World War, citizens from the Commonwealth. It would also include a study of the rise and fall of the first and second British empires. Before the 20th cent., governments did not often intervene to protect newcomers or promote racial harmony. Cnut was anxious to hold a balance between his Danish and English subjects; Henry VIII in 1535 complained that ‘rude and ignorant’ people were stirring up ‘discord, division and murmur’ between his Welsh and English subjects; and James I took the earliest opportunity to recommend ‘mutual love’ between his Scottish and his new English subjects. Racial questions were usually complicated by other considerations, particularly religion and employment. French Huguenots in the 17th cent., because of their religion, were on the whole welcomed: Jews and Irish catholics less so. In its modern form, race relations developed mainly through the anti-slavery campaign in the late 18th and early 19th cents. Opponents of emancipation justified slavery on arguments of racial inferiority, offensively expressed by Thomas Carlyle in an essay on ‘The Nigger Question’ in Frazer's Magazine for 1849. Immigration from the Commonwealth in the 1950s and 1960s, particularly from India and the West Indies, placed the question on the political agenda. The 1965 Race Relations Act, passed by the Wilson government, prohibited discrimination in places of public resort, such as hotels or restaurants, made the promotion of hatred on grounds of ‘colour, race, or ethnic or national origins’ an offence, and established a Race Relations Board to hear complaints. The measure was extended by further Acts in 1968 and 1976, the last providing for a Race Relations Commission to promote ‘equality of opportunity and good relations’.
J. A. Cannon
Atilla
Legendary member
- Messages
- 20,775
- Likes
- 3,976
glyder
Established member
- Messages
- 755
- Likes
- 94
You're right, It is a scandal, but when I saw that article I was surprised it is recent news. This policy is a part of marxist divide /water down & rule global domination policy. Always has been, 'globalisation' (in terms of movement and mix of people rather than business)is a marxist social policy, and its been clear what Lab have been up to this past decade.
The thing is it will come back and bite their (and all ours) ass in more ways than one, too.
Its very depressing.
Atilla
Legendary member
- Messages
- 20,775
- Likes
- 3,976
Originally Posted by WinstonSmith View Post
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...r-adviser.html
From the article above, "Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed."
If there is any truth to this, it is an absolute scandal.
Common policy in response to;
1. Aging popullation
2. Impending pension crises
3. Impending NHS crises
4. Wage supression policy to beat excess demand
It has/was a successful policy until the recession came and bit Labour in the ass.
Government policy indeed it was. Not sure what other solution there is. Kick the migrant foreign labour out and within 10-15 years points 1-3 will be overbearing on the economy.
Moreover, looking at European countries all with aging popullations - if not for migrants the naturals would die out in another couple of generations because people don't have 2.4 kids anymore but 1.4. The 0.4 is the dog by the way or what ever your household pet is. With heavy taxation disposable income to support families will become considerably less.
Social infrastructure is going to tatters with 1 in 3 divorce rates.
People choosing not to marry or marry later on in their lives.
Infertility rates rising due to drugs, alcohol and smoking... Or what ever - perhaps GM feed who knows...
Child abuse and single parent families or children in adopted households rising.
Once again in response to demographic factors going back couple of decades this policy was silently accepted as a solution.
In budgets they have been talking about family friendly taxes as well as giving more maternity leave to both parents or one to look after children...
Think as to where all these policy changes are coming from and for what reason?
BNP comes along in a recession and picks a scape coat and typically the Telegraph jumps on the bandwagon helping Tories to steal a few more votes...
Nick Griffin says our taxes are rising because of foreigners and everybody says yeah that's right. But the UK gets monies from the European Union for supporting migrants and asylum seekers it takes in.
It is a European Union directive that supportive language be established for all 25 member states. Once again the UK gets money for this purpose.
How can we get the UK economy competitive and producing and manufacturing again at world beating prices??? That is the question to answer.
So many issues and a single silver bullet isn't the answer....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...r-adviser.html
From the article above, "Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed."
If there is any truth to this, it is an absolute scandal.
Common policy in response to;
1. Aging popullation
2. Impending pension crises
3. Impending NHS crises
4. Wage supression policy to beat excess demand
It has/was a successful policy until the recession came and bit Labour in the ass.
Government policy indeed it was. Not sure what other solution there is. Kick the migrant foreign labour out and within 10-15 years points 1-3 will be overbearing on the economy.
Moreover, looking at European countries all with aging popullations - if not for migrants the naturals would die out in another couple of generations because people don't have 2.4 kids anymore but 1.4. The 0.4 is the dog by the way or what ever your household pet is. With heavy taxation disposable income to support families will become considerably less.
Social infrastructure is going to tatters with 1 in 3 divorce rates.
People choosing not to marry or marry later on in their lives.
Infertility rates rising due to drugs, alcohol and smoking... Or what ever - perhaps GM feed who knows...
Child abuse and single parent families or children in adopted households rising.
Once again in response to demographic factors going back couple of decades this policy was silently accepted as a solution.
In budgets they have been talking about family friendly taxes as well as giving more maternity leave to both parents or one to look after children...
Think as to where all these policy changes are coming from and for what reason?
BNP comes along in a recession and picks a scape coat and typically the Telegraph jumps on the bandwagon helping Tories to steal a few more votes...
Nick Griffin says our taxes are rising because of foreigners and everybody says yeah that's right. But the UK gets monies from the European Union for supporting migrants and asylum seekers it takes in.
It is a European Union directive that supportive language be established for all 25 member states. Once again the UK gets money for this purpose.
How can we get the UK economy competitive and producing and manufacturing again at world beating prices??? That is the question to answer.
So many issues and a single silver bullet isn't the answer....
gamma
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,231
- Likes
- 331
Early American settlers predominately white of european stock
common broad religion christanity
\what I should have said in my earlier post was, these were factors that bought people together.
English was the the language used by goverment and you had to use it .
So the stage was set and if you wanted to join you played by the rules.
The chinese,Japanese, hispanics played by the rules and prospered, they did not try to impose or try tochange the mainsty culture,nor did they go to the wolly headed human rights or liberals crying that their human rights were being violated.
unlike the today where its does not matter if you don't speak english, a translator will be bought in for you at a cost to the tax payer so you can claim your benefits.
Last edited:
Atilla
Legendary member
- Messages
- 20,775
- Likes
- 3,976
Yes but it was a period when Europe despite it's common religion was at war. French, Dutch, English, Spanish, Irish - the whole lot. There was also the Boston tea party when those very people even turned on their original rulers. Same applies to Canada - Quebec up until recently. Let's not forget slavery either which was a big factor in making these countries what they are today.
I would argue the reverse. If you look at the very successful continents America and Europe - the reason for their success before & after the wars was - is precisely because they are united people from very diverse cultures, religions and backgrounds.
Go to an area with purely white supremists and you get a bland taste of not much. Go to any metropolitan city with wide diversity and you get a heaving buzzing sense of prosperity and dynamics imo and experience.
In all these big cities the original indigineous popullation still don't lose their culture or inheritance. I really don't know what the fuss is about. Rome is distinctly different to Paris, which is different to Belgium which is different from Berlin to New York or LA. London is well cool with almost no equal. Zurich etc etc. Anybody who travels can vouch for that.
Correct me if I am wrong. All these big cities are full of foreign workers tourists and non-domiciled alien habitants...
The issue is some people want to choose not to mix and they want to have the choice. I don't blame them as all people have predujices and to a part racist.
In America the whites and blacks didn't used to mix. One might argue it was the sound of Jazz, Soul and Rock and Roll that brought them together. Black people had all the Soul, Jazz and good Rock and Roll and whites had very little. LIke the pied piper they flocked to the beautiful heaving sound of good ol rock n roll. These were the young people - much against the displeasure of their white church going racist parents. And thus the people broke down social barriers and taboos.
Yes but it was a period when Europe despite it's common religion was at war. French, Dutch, English, Spanish, Irish - the whole lot. There was also the Boston tea party when those very people even turned on their original rulers. Same applies to Canada - Quebec up until recently. Let's not forget slavery either which was a big factor in making these countries what they are today.
I would argue the reverse. If you look at the very successful continents America and Europe - the reason for their success before & after the wars was - is precisely because they are united people from very diverse cultures, religions and backgrounds.
Go to an area with purely white supremists and you get a bland taste of not much. Go to any metropolitan city with wide diversity and you get a heaving buzzing sense of prosperity and dynamics imo and experience.
In all these big cities the original indigineous popullation still don't lose their culture or inheritance. I really don't know what the fuss is about. Rome is distinctly different to Paris, which is different to Belgium which is different from Berlin to New York or LA. London is well cool with almost no equal. Zurich etc etc. Anybody who travels can vouch for that.
Correct me if I am wrong. All these big cities are full of foreign workers tourists and non-domiciled alien habitants...
The issue is some people want to choose not to mix and they want to have the choice. I don't blame them as all people have predujices and to a part racist.
In America the whites and blacks didn't used to mix. One might argue it was the sound of Jazz, Soul and Rock and Roll that brought them together. Black people had all the Soul, Jazz and good Rock and Roll and whites had very little. LIke the pied piper they flocked to the beautiful heaving sound of good ol rock n roll. These were the young people - much against the displeasure of their white church going racist parents. And thus the people broke down social barriers and taboos.
I like the picture that you paint. My daughter has just come back from New York and she commented on how kind everyone is to one another. Perhaps that is a tourist's view, but she said that she was impressed by the way that, no matter how busy they are, they seem to find time to help and said that of all the capitals that she has visited, London and New York are the greatest. Maybe, her command of both English and Spanish has a lot to do with it.
Nevertheless, opposition to this kind of change is healthy because, without it, the prosperous nations would be flooded. The change must have its brakes applied. BNP's policies are distasteful and unacceptable but it is the way that these changes are controlled, in the same way that it has taken so long for the US to have a black president.
The UK is set to have 70 million within 25 years. Can the social services deal with that? The taxpayer will have to pay. Brown is a convenient whipping boy, currently, but it doesn't matter who is going to be in charge, the problems will, still, be there.
Last edited:
