Sorry, but I will have to enable "ignore this thread", because the levels of mental confusion and conspiracist lies that I see in here are beyond comprehensible.
D'AYC,
If your post is in response to my comment above, then I suggest a more useful thing to do would be to outline what it is that you find
"beyond comprehensible"? I don't want to believe what I wrote - and I hope it's not true. However, the actions of the west - especially the U.S. - means that I have to consider it as a possibility. Having an open mind is essential if one is the get to the truth, even if that means contemplating the unthinkable. What I outline is entirely logical, albeit unpalatable. So, your accusation of
"mental confusion" is, IMO, unfounded. As for
"conspiracist lies" - there are none. I'm merely putting forward reasons how and why the U.S. might benefit from the deaths of Ukrainians.
You appear to view the conflict in a binary way. That is to say, you give the impression (please correct me if I'm wrong) that you really do believe the mantra
'Zelensky & Ukraine good - Putin & Russia bad'? I put it to you that you'll never uncover the truth if you only view the situation (whatever it is - not just this war) by looking exclusively at one side of the argument and never considering an opposing view. As a successful trader, I'm sure you do exactly that with every trade. You evaluate each trade in the round and consider the reasons for
not taking it - as well as the reasons
for taking it. So why not apply the same logic here?
Tim.
