Member of the Month and Moderators

[orchard]

Chartman, in his acceptance, avers that Moderators should not be nominated. Why?

It seems to me that, if all they did was moderate, OK, but, as far as I can see all the moderators contribute a great deal to the boards, in fact, they are, in the main, the most active members.

As far as I am concerned, they are very deserving of a nomination if we (the hoi poloi ) say so :cheesy:

Pity we can't nominate Sharky

 

[reddragon]

Hi,
I agree with orchard - if you can't nominate/ vote for one of the
best then the comp. can be farcical. How about a rule where
the months winner is to be excluded for nomination for the
following 2/3 month period?
Reddragon.

 

[FTSE Beater]

Hi Orchard

I agree (speaking as a member not a moderator). The moderators are members too, and deserve to be nominated if someone feels they do

Sharky certainly shouldn't be voted for. He would win more often than not and he has to give everyone else a chance....doesn't he

<hr>
Hi RedDragon

I think that is an excellent idea