I ieonqutav Junior member Messages 11 Likes 0 Nov 27, 2009 #1 Do you think that this statement, within certain conditions, could be a basis for a sound trading method, or just plain stupidity anyway?
Do you think that this statement, within certain conditions, could be a basis for a sound trading method, or just plain stupidity anyway?
D donaldduke Experienced member Messages 1,665 Likes 260 Nov 27, 2009 #2 You missed the bit about doubling up..
D dealer911 Well-known member Messages 436 Likes 24 Nov 27, 2009 #4 It's plain stupidity - if the" certain conditions" were you doubled up every time you lost and waited for it to turn positive you will wipe out within 1 month - somewhere theres a poor guy with Enron shares who tried that strategy.
It's plain stupidity - if the" certain conditions" were you doubled up every time you lost and waited for it to turn positive you will wipe out within 1 month - somewhere theres a poor guy with Enron shares who tried that strategy.
D donaldduke Experienced member Messages 1,665 Likes 260 Nov 27, 2009 #5 ieonqutav said: Do you think that this statement, within certain conditions, could be a basis for a sound trading method, or just plain stupidity anyway? Click to expand... If you work at a bank or very large hedge fund you can improve on this basic strategy by using your resources to push the market back in your favour. When done with with a big losing position, it is known in the industry as the 'Leeson Gambit'.
ieonqutav said: Do you think that this statement, within certain conditions, could be a basis for a sound trading method, or just plain stupidity anyway? Click to expand... If you work at a bank or very large hedge fund you can improve on this basic strategy by using your resources to push the market back in your favour. When done with with a big losing position, it is known in the industry as the 'Leeson Gambit'.