They show 0.3 MM on the capacity attribute for the small timeframes. I'm curious what will happen with divergence if that is reached.
-
Welcome to the Darwinex Forums, these forums are member-run and managed by CavaliereVerde. Member-run forum rules may differ from the site guidelines.
I neglected to look at this chart, which gives a bit more info.
(And for clarification in case any non Darwinex geeks are reading this).
"Averages" can hide a multitude of sins.
I just discovered this Darwin some minutes ago thanks to this forum.
I'm not an investor and I just check here and there for sake of curiosity (I'm a nerd trader). Very few Darwins look so impresive as this one. Long trackrecord, impressive return, small DD, small stagnation. What else can you ask?
To me everything looks perfect on this one. Bravo!
I'm not an investor and I just check here and there for sake of curiosity (I'm a nerd trader). Very few Darwins look so impresive as this one. Long trackrecord, impressive return, small DD, small stagnation. What else can you ask?
To me everything looks perfect on this one. Bravo!
migrated...
this is the thinking process of 99% of investors... that lose money....
mmmm
a decent capacity?perfect for Darwinex, as we stated above.
Harsh, but valid points.migrated...
this is the thinking process of 99% of investors... that lose money....
mmmm
perfect for Darwinex, as we stated above.
That's what Darwinex rewards with a D-Score above 90.
And that's what @CavaliereVerde pointed out:
About 10 % of the max. AuM left with losses after the first moderate drop in return.
We started with the bad points but I think QJU is not a bad darwin, not a bad trader.
Return chart after migration is pretty consistent with pre migration.
Trading journal is superconsistent, same risk and same style before and after migration, a swiss clock.
The point is that all this consistency and performance is just wasted with such a low capacity.
QJU is already at full capacity!
We are darwin providers and we know that the min value for capacity management is 300k, here the trader should limit it to 200k to keep profitable investors and this is not allowed.
On the long run there will be no performance fees for this guy, only management fees for Darwinex.
Return chart after migration is pretty consistent with pre migration.
Trading journal is superconsistent, same risk and same style before and after migration, a swiss clock.
The point is that all this consistency and performance is just wasted with such a low capacity.
QJU is already at full capacity!
We are darwin providers and we know that the min value for capacity management is 300k, here the trader should limit it to 200k to keep profitable investors and this is not allowed.
On the long run there will be no performance fees for this guy, only management fees for Darwinex.
Because he is trading huge order sizes - average trade size is about four times the investment amount:
Compare that figure with other Darwins
, like SYO ($ 335,334.58 with more than 5.4 million AuM) or ILR ($ 1,677.62)
Last edited: