trilobite
Active member
- Messages
- 170
- Likes
- 295
Harsh, but valid points.
-
Welcome to the Darwinex Forums, these forums are member-run and managed by CavaliereVerde. Member-run forum rules may differ from the site guidelines.
IlIlIlIlI
Senior member
- Messages
- 3,334
- Likes
- 2,303
That's what Darwinex rewards with a D-Score above 90.
And that's what @CavaliereVerde pointed out:
About 10 % of the max. AuM left with losses after the first moderate drop in return.
CavaliereVerde
Senior member
- Messages
- 2,796
- Likes
- 2,732
We started with the bad points but I think QJU is not a bad darwin, not a bad trader.
Return chart after migration is pretty consistent with pre migration.
Trading journal is superconsistent, same risk and same style before and after migration, a swiss clock.
The point is that all this consistency and performance is just wasted with such a low capacity.
QJU is already at full capacity!
We are darwin providers and we know that the min value for capacity management is 300k, here the trader should limit it to 200k to keep profitable investors and this is not allowed.
On the long run there will be no performance fees for this guy, only management fees for Darwinex.
Return chart after migration is pretty consistent with pre migration.
Trading journal is superconsistent, same risk and same style before and after migration, a swiss clock.
The point is that all this consistency and performance is just wasted with such a low capacity.
QJU is already at full capacity!
We are darwin providers and we know that the min value for capacity management is 300k, here the trader should limit it to 200k to keep profitable investors and this is not allowed.
On the long run there will be no performance fees for this guy, only management fees for Darwinex.
IlIlIlIlI
Senior member
- Messages
- 3,334
- Likes
- 2,303
Because he is trading huge order sizes - average trade size is about four times the investment amount:
Compare that figure with other Darwins 😉, like SYO ($ 335,334.58 with more than 5.4 million AuM) or ILR ($ 1,677.62) 🙂
Last edited:
CavaliereVerde
Senior member
- Messages
- 2,796
- Likes
- 2,732
Trader's equity is back to 1000 , not a good sign.
IlIlIlIlI
Senior member
- Messages
- 3,334
- Likes
- 2,303
There is more to think about: Darwin is also below Darwin's initial price, so there are no investor fees left. Yearly result is currently negative. Max. DD is increasing. And nobody knows, which broker made its track record before migration.
Last edited:
CavaliereVerde
Senior member
- Messages
- 2,796
- Likes
- 2,732
The main indicator is the smart money, the money of the trader.
Only the trader knows the context of a trackrecord,
The significance of the DD of a farmed Grail is pretty low.
Low DD is the bait for dumb money.
The equity of the trader represents the confidence of the trader in the strategy and if he thinks to be competitive in Darwinia.
Only the trader knows the context of a trackrecord,
The significance of the DD of a farmed Grail is pretty low.
Low DD is the bait for dumb money.
The equity of the trader represents the confidence of the trader in the strategy and if he thinks to be competitive in Darwinia.
Last edited:
CavaliereVerde
Senior member
- Messages
- 2,796
- Likes
- 2,732
The guy decided to break the swiss clock to start gambling.
Years with max 2 open trades and now SIX open trades...
