thebesttrader
Newbie
- Messages
- 2
- Likes
- 0
city index were quoting for june whitbread somewhere around 1070 a few weeks ago, so i went long, current price being around 1200p
the next day, around 4:45pm I got a call saying that the quote had been a mistake and that the opening price had been corrected to 1210 or something.
after returning froma trip abroad i phoned city index, they said that they were expecting a dividend but realised it wouldn't me made anymore. (whitbread had made a special dividend in may last year)
so according to city index, they are allowed to change the opening price in accordance with their terms
"14.5 This clause applies if a dividend is declared or paid in respect of
any equity which is unusually small or large or unusually early or late
(compared to dividends declared in previous years). In this case City
Index may (acting reasonably) make an appropriate adjustment (which
may be retrospective) to the opening level of a bet relating to that
equity, in order to reflect that dividend in the opening level of the bet."
But whitbread didn't declare or pay any dividend around that time. They hadn't said that they would pay a dividend, and hadn't said they wouldn't. The case is that city index thought they would and then changed their mind and the opening level of the bet.
i won't be taking this laying down, but wanted to know anyone's thoughts/ and whether anyone else was involved in whitbread with city index.
any thoughts/opinions greatly appreciated
the next day, around 4:45pm I got a call saying that the quote had been a mistake and that the opening price had been corrected to 1210 or something.
after returning froma trip abroad i phoned city index, they said that they were expecting a dividend but realised it wouldn't me made anymore. (whitbread had made a special dividend in may last year)
so according to city index, they are allowed to change the opening price in accordance with their terms
"14.5 This clause applies if a dividend is declared or paid in respect of
any equity which is unusually small or large or unusually early or late
(compared to dividends declared in previous years). In this case City
Index may (acting reasonably) make an appropriate adjustment (which
may be retrospective) to the opening level of a bet relating to that
equity, in order to reflect that dividend in the opening level of the bet."
But whitbread didn't declare or pay any dividend around that time. They hadn't said that they would pay a dividend, and hadn't said they wouldn't. The case is that city index thought they would and then changed their mind and the opening level of the bet.
i won't be taking this laying down, but wanted to know anyone's thoughts/ and whether anyone else was involved in whitbread with city index.
any thoughts/opinions greatly appreciated