Technical Analysis

The Art of Trading?

How many times have you heard someone say, “Trading is an art, not a science.”? I have heard that for years and years and I have to say, it is probably the most ridiculous statement I have heard when it comes to trading and, as we all know, there are some pretty ridiculous statements in the trading world. There is absolutely nothing artistic about trading at all. This is, 100%, a numbers game… How much willing demand and supply there is at each price level is what determines price turns and movement. It’s the buy orders vs. the sell orders and, again, it all comes down to the numbers on both sides of that equation and nothing else. To think Picasso or Van Gough should be brought into this discussion is rather amusing if you think about it. To illustrate the point, let me share a very recent trade we setup for our students.

Live Trading Session – Feb. 12, 2016

Placeholder

XLT trade using supply and demand strategy

During this session we were going over a shorting opportunity in the NASDAQ.  Notice the supply level with the black lines around it. According to our supply and demand strategy that I write about so often, that area shaded was a key supply level. Meaning, institutions/banks had large orders to sell at that level, there was a significant supply and demand imbalance at that level. We know this because price could not remain at that level and declined in strong fashion after a very short period of time . Think about it, if supply and demand were in balance at that level, price would have remained at that level, but it couldn’t because supply and demand were very much “out of balance”. I mentioned price spent very little time at that level and this is a key point. The less time price spends at a level, the more out of balance supply and demand is at the level.

Trading books tell us when looking for key support and resistance levels to look for areas on the chart where there was lots of trading activity, many candles on the screen, above average volume and so on… If you think the simple logic through, I think you will find the opposite to be true. At price levels in any market where supply and demand are most out of balance you are going to get very few transactions (trades), not many trades. Therefore, that picture on a chart is going to be few candles on the screen, not many like all the trading books say and this was the case in our trading opportunity above.

As you can see on the chart to the right, a bit later price rallied up to the supply level offering us an opportunity to sell short with a significant profit zone below. As the chart shows, there was little demand below meaning price should have a very easy time falling. Lastly, when price reaches supply we always want to know who we are selling to. We need to make sure we are selling to a novice retail trader, someone who is clearly willing to pay retail prices. The way we answer this questions is this: Is the buyer we are selling to buying after a rally in price and into a price level where supply exceeds demand. These are the two footprints of a novice market speculator. If the answers are yes and the risk to reward meets the minimum criteria we are looking for, we take the trade like a robot.

The mathematical equation we mapped out in advance played out as we thought and our profit target was achieved. If you think art had anything to do with this, I have an original very rare one of a kind painting that was painted by Big Foot in the Rocky Mountains 200 years ago. It’s worth $100,000 but I will give it to you for $10,000, so hurry. You see, when I was on the institution side of the trading business it was very clear from day one that price moves 100% because of an ongoing supply and demand equation in each and every market. Trading opportunities exist when this simple and straight forward equation is out of balance. At the CME where I began my career, they didn’t have Monets or Picassos on the wall, they had bids and offers. If I wanted to see art, I would walk down Monroe Street to Michigan Avenue and go to the Art Institute. Goldman Sachs doesn’t start out each trading day with a company meeting to discuss artistic opportunities in the market; every single decision is based on inventory, order flow and risk/reward.

The only place art and trading come together is in the world of conventional technical analysis. Meaning, conventional chart patterns which people refer to as the “art,” like Head and Shoulders, Cup and Handle and all the others that will serve you much better with a frame around them on your wall than they will trying to use them to make money. While I may get some unfriendly emails from this article, I take it as my responsibility to be very honest with people as your hard earned money is on the line with each and every trade.

Sam Seiden can be contacted on this link: Sam Seiden

Sam brings over 15 years experience of equities and futures trading which began when he was on the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. He has traded equities, futures, interest rate markets, forex, options, and commodities for his personal interests for years and has educated hundreds of traders and investors through seminars and daily advisory services both domestically and internationally. Sam has been involved in the markets since 1991 both on and off the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. He has served as the Director of Technical Research for two trading firms and regularly contributes articles to industry publications. Sam is known for his trading, technical research, and educational guidance.Points of interest:• Chicago Mercantile Exchange Floor• Author of Market Advisory Letters• Fund Manager/CTA• Speaker to Investment Groups, Universities, and Private Seminars• Contributing Author for Stocks, Futures, and Options Magazine, Active Trader Magazine, and Futures Magazine• Trading and Investment Conference Speaker

Sam brings over 15 years experience of equities and futures trading which began when he was on the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. He has tr...

aag100

Established member
611 35
it is entirely an art.the numbers result from your interpretation of it.
so you might have called this example right but im sure instances of getting your demand/supply levels wrong will be more numerous.
call it what you may,art,science,supply/demand.it is arrogant to call the opposite opinion ridiculous in this game unless ofcourse you are always right
 

fxbears

Newbie
4 1
How much "willing" demand and supply there is at each price level

THANKS Sam
This opening statement really made me go Ahhahh the word Willing screamed out to me and the second fast rally yet not taking out the highs seems to be the fact that the Value Price is manipulated to enable banks/institutions to offload the remainder of stocks/currencies being held.
Thanks Sam
Regards Rich
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forexmospherian

Lúidín

Established member
818 61
I do agree with your statement about standard technical analysis, but to use the NQ as an example for Institutional supply and demand, in my opinion, is not that good.

NQ can move 20 points in a flash, as I know from trading it, and you have failed to mention the importance of short term algo trading on Index Futures, which is very common.

I would have much prefered to have seen an example with a blue chip US stock.

WRB > NRB > WRB

LN
 

MainCycleV

Junior member
43 5
When we say trading is an art, we mean that there is no direct or linear relationship between the price trends and any factors, and that you never exactly know what is going on people's mind. Nothing to do with Picasso or Van Gogh.
 

evertontrader

Member
61 9
Sam,

Years ago, I was a disciple of your form of technical analysis. Unfortunately as the results of using your approach were based on the assumption of supply and demand zones which, when followed to the letter, produced very random outcomes. I needed further evidence that these zones existed as I began to risk greater sums on this assumption so I spent a long time looking into the theory behind your ideas.

My opinion now is that these zones are merely oscillation points of the price as the thousands of participants in the markets express their very subjective views by buying or selling... and have nothing to do with the markets "memory" of supply and demand points.

When you factor in things like currency overlay, delta hedging and the wider hedging of all assets across markets... huge buy and sell orders come in to all markets with no directional bias what so ever, all the time. This means there was no preconceived point of value determined (the price does not matter at all), the orders instead offset a corresponding order or position, which completely undermines the idea of "wholesale" prices.

Regards