UK Politics

Atilla said:
What is not understood is why YOU are so obsessed with brown people and on a crusade???
Click to expand...
  • Prior to domicile in the UK, we lived abroad with permits to carry.
  • Like cancer, we know no discrimination between color, race, creed, rich, poor, the good, the bad, the bold, the beautiful, the ugly.
  • Unlike cancer, that eats away slowly, we don't have time, interest, or patients — we prefer legal, instant karma*.
  • Here today, gone today. It's very efficient and does not cost the taxpayer.
* Unlike other areas of the globe, the UK does not have a legally enshrined "stand your ground" law—so it's a case of bend over, mate, and take one up the aris for good ol' England.

How a funfair kiss led to Jack Woodley being killed by a sick mob of 10
Surrounded and preyed upon by a pack of ten bloodthirsty teenagers, Jack Woodley never stood a chance as he curled up on the ground and braced himself for a frenzied attack as he walked home from the funfair.

Punched, kicked, stamped upon and fatally wounded with a Rambo knife, the 5ft 7in, 10st 8lb victim was completely defenceless as the vicious gang murdered him 'like zombies attacking an animal' in front of horrified onlookers on October 16 2021.

Tragically, it was these 10 animals against one. Jack was hunted down and stabbed in the back during an 80-second attack while making his way home from the Houghton Feast funfair, in Houghton-le-Spring near Sunderland.

All of the killers, who can now be named after turning 18, were handed life sentences with the following minimum terms:
  1. Calum Maddison, 17 years
  2. Blaine Sewell, 13 years and five months
  3. Sonny Smith, 15 years
  4. Grant Wheatley, 15 years
  5. Lewis Rose, eight years
  6. Tyler Brewis, 13 years
  7. Rhys Wear, 10 years
  8. Leighton Mayo, 11 years
  9. Joe Lathan, 11 years
  10. Clayton Owen, 11 years
The BS semantics of the term, 'life sentence' (in this instance, specific to the UK)

All ten individuals convicted of the murder of Jack Woodley in Houghton-le-Spring, UK, received life sentences in August 2022, with minimum terms ranging from eight to 17 years, depending on their role and age at the time. The judge specified different minimum terms to reflect each youth's degree of involvement, personal circumstances, and likelihood of rehabilitation. All these sentences met the UK's mandatory requirement for life imprisonment in murder cases, but with varying tariffs (minimum periods before Parole Board review).

In the UK, a "life sentence" means the convicted person is subject to that sentence for the rest of their life. However, it does not always mean being in prison for life:
  • The judge sets a minimum term (the "tariff") that must be served in prison.
  • After serving the tariff, the offender can apply for parole, and if released, will spend the rest of their life "on licence" in the community.
  • If licence conditions are broken or new crimes are committed, the person can be recalled to prison at any time.
  • Only in the most severe cases is a "whole life order" imposed, requiring the person to spend their entire life in prison without parole. In the Jack Woodley case, none of the defendants got a whole life order given their ages and specific circumstances; instead, each received a life sentence with a set minimum term.
Thus, while each person found guilty of Jack Woodley's murder received a life sentence, the actual time each must serve in prison before possible parole ranges between 8 and 17 years, followed by lifelong supervision

Pic - 2025-08-04 07-49-58.png
#
Pic - 2025-08-04 07-50-32.png

Pic - 2025-08-04 07-50-58.png

Pic - 2025-08-04 07-56-12.png

Pic - 2025-08-04 07-52-00.png
 
UK Two Tier Justice System
Image 2025-08-15 12-17-26.png
Ricky Jones, a Labour councillor and union official, was at the centre of a major controversy in the UK in 2025 after making inflammatory comments at an anti-racism rally in Walthamstow. During the protest—which took place in the wake of the violent Southport murders and subsequent riots—Jones called far-right demonstrators “disgusting Nazi fascists” and said, “We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all,” while drawing his finger across his throat to a large crowd. The video of his speech quickly went viral, leading to his suspension by the Labour Party and criminal charges for allegedly encouraging violent disorder.

Jones later expressed regret, claiming his words were spoken in the heat of the moment and did not genuinely intend to incite violence. He said he was “horrified” by his own comments after reviewing the footage and edited the video before sharing it with union colleagues. Legal experts presented evidence that Jones suffers from impulsivity, which may have influenced his reactive speech in emotionally charged situations.

Despite the seriousness of the accusations and widespread debate over political tolerance, free speech, and the appropriateness of violent rhetoric, Ricky Jones was found not guilty of encouraging violent disorder after a short jury deliberation on August 15, 2025. The verdict means that, despite suspension from his party and public outcry, Jones will not face criminal penalty for the remarks. The case highlighted tensions between robust speech, political activism, and legal boundaries during a period of heightened social unrest in the UK.

Summary of the Injustice in the Lucy Connolly Case (UK)​

Lucy Connolly, a Northampton childminder and wife of a Conservative councillor, was sentenced to 31 months in prison for inciting racial hatred after posting a tweet reacting to the Southport murders in July 2024. Her tweet, written in distress following false reports about the incident, called for “mass deportation” and included a provocative comment about setting fire to hotels housing asylum seekers. Although Connolly deleted the post soon after, screenshots led to her arrest and prosecution.

Key Elements of Alleged Injustice​

  • Harsh Sentence vs. Mitigating Factors: Multiple legal professionals and observers have called her punishment inordinately harsh given that comparable or more serious crimes (such as child abuse or violent offenses) have led to shorter sentences. Connolly’s supporters assert she received a longer sentence “for one tweet than some paedophiles and domestic abusers get”.
  • Plea Under Duress: Connolly pleaded guilty while held on remand, demoralized, unable to speak with her solicitor adequately, and hoping for a quick resolution. She reportedly did not fully understand the legal consequences of her plea and was advised she’d be released earlier by pleading guilty.
  • Limited Psychiatric Evaluation: Her history of PTSD—linked to the early death of her child—was not considered in her brief psychiatric assessment. Observers suggest the court failed to meaningfully account for her mental health at the time of the offense.
  • No Jury Trial: Barristers indicated that, had the case gone to jury trial, she likely wouldn’t have been convicted for a single rash tweet, especially given other similar cases post-Southport resulting in acquittals.
  • No Early Release or Tag: Despite being a low-risk, primary caregiver for her child, Connolly was denied early release and electronic tagging, privileges often granted to prisoners convicted of more serious crimes. Officials implied this was due to “press and public perception,” not legal risk or rehabilitation needs.
  • Political Context and Free Speech: Many commentators, including political leaders and legal analysts, argue that Connolly’s sentence was a product of a “politicised two-tier justice system” intended to deter criticism of immigration policy or public disorder, rather than uphold the law proportionately. This has raised concerns about the erosion of free speech and proportionality in UK justice, with some branding Connolly a “political prisoner” or “free speech martyr”.

Public and Legal Debate​

  • The case ignited political and public debate over the boundaries of free speech, the proportionality of sentencing for hate speech, and the influence of media and politics on judicial outcomes.
  • High-profile figures, including former home secretary Suella Braverman and ex-PM Liz Truss, have called for Connolly’s release, citing the excessive nature of her sentence and the impact on her family. Critics argue her case highlights inconsistencies in British sentencing and an undue chilling effect on speech—even when distasteful or offensive.
In summary, many legal experts, politicians, and commentators consider Lucy Connolly’s treatment emblematic of disproportionate punishment, flawed legal process, politicization of justice, and the tightening boundaries of free speech in the UK.
 
Last edited:

Fury as Labour-run council tears down 'dangerous' St George's and Union Jack flags from city streets (but Palestine flags are allowed)​

A Labour-run council has sparked a major backlash by tearing down St George's and Union Jack flags from streets because they 'could put lives at risk' - despite Palestinian flags flying high across the city for several months.
Critics have also pointed out that Palestinian flags have flown across the city, where 29.9 per cent of residents are Muslim, for several months since the war broke out in Gaza.

Meanwhile, the council also lit up the Library of Birmingham in green and white to mark the anniversary of Pakistan's independence day yesterday and will do so in orange, green and white to mark India's independence today.
www.dailymail.co.uk

Fury as Labour-run council tears down 'dangerous' St George's flags

Scores of St George and Union Jack flags have sprung up on lampposts and buildings across parts of Northfield, Birmingham , in what organisers have described as a 'patriotic outpouring'.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
 
* What would have been the outcome for an 11 year old girl had this been the UK ?

II YEAR OLD SHOOTS ILLEGALS - thanks FOX NEWS for reporting it. BUTTE , MONTANA Shotgun preteen vs. Illegal alien Home Invaders...Two illegal aliens, Ralphel Resindez, 23, and Enrico Garza, 26, probably believed they would easily overpower home-alone 11-year-old Patricia Harrington after her father had left their two-story home. It seems the two crooks never learned two things: they were in Montana and Patricia had been a clay-shooting champion since she was nine. Patricia was in her upstairs room when the two men broke through the front door of the house. She quickly ran to her father's room and grabbed his 12-gauge Mossberg 500 shotgun. Resindez was the first to get up to the second floor only to be the first to catch a near point blank blast of buckshot from the 11-year-old's knee-crouch aim. He suffered fatal wounds to his abdomen and genitals. When Garza ran to the foot of the stairs, he took a blast to the left shoulder and staggered out into the ...street where he bled to death before medical help could arrive. It was found out later that Resindez was armed with a stolen 45-caliber handgun he took from another home invasion robbery. That victim, 50-year-old David 0'Burien, was not so lucky. He died from stab wounds to the chest. *
  • Ever wonder why good stuff never makes NBC, CBS, PBS, MSNBC, CNN, or ABC news........? An 11 year old girl, properly trained, defended her home, and herself......against two murderous, illegal immigrants.......and she wins. She is still alive. Now THAT is Gun Control!Thought for the day....
  • Calling an illegal alien an 'undocumented immigrant' is like calling a drug dealer an 'unlicensed pharmacist.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1957627889354174924
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

wasp
Uk
2 3
Replies
41
Views
14K
JTrader
JTrader
Back
Top