chrisw said:
but if you don't concentrate on minimizing risk, you could wipe out before your rich.
i dont want to get into a semantics thing here, but i think this one needs more focus.
i think perhaps the best angle would be risk appreciation.
if we minimize risk totally, we have no risk - i.e. we dont trade. we must take risk, and embrace risk in all its dimensions. only once we have fully understood risks can we progress to the next levels. the step before appreciating and understanding risk is understanding ourselves. an old adage but its true. rols skirts this issue, but at least it has been raised.
there are several things at risk when we trade with little (few years of) experience: the obvious risk of money, but perhaps more importantly the risk of losing our confidence or ego.
i have found the hardest trades to take are when we perceive risk to be at its highest, but when we analyse the trade from hindsight, we often discover the trade in fact had very little risk. there is always LESS risk at the start of the move (in proportion to potential and unknown rewards), yet this is the point where risk often appears to be highest due to the lack of confirmation (information to please the conscious). once that confirmation has been established, risk is inevitably higher, as the controlling money is now looking to take some or total profits, knowing they now have the liquidity to do so - now the 'fools have rushed in'. that confirmation could be of many forms - it could be a news item for a fundamental investor, or it could be the breach of a technical level for a day trader.
so actual risk and perceived risk are in fact two very different and often opposite things.
well thats how i see it anyway!