Proof?
I dont have to prove anything to you guys. In fact you were never even invited into this thread, and you accuse me of entering univited, when I was responding to a feedback request by Jeywhistle.
END;
Oh ... you're back.
10: If current bar >1 begin
20: If TT911 making no further comment = false; continue
30: If TT911 providing substance for system claims = true; continue
40: If TT911 diverting discussion to avoid providing evidence of claims = true; continue
50: If TT911 statement "Sorry I have more important things to do than to post images" = false; continue
60: If TT911 now shown to be a marketeer-on-the-defensive = true; continue
70: If TT911 gets the idea and offers proof of claims =true; End
80: If TT1911 continues in current untenable attitude = true; Go to 10
90: If TT911 grows up and engages in useful dialogue on Pi_OSC = true; continue
100: If 90 = false; End
110: If TT911 is system promoter sprung hunting for personal gain = true; continue
120: If TT911 is just a newb who spruiks something she has no proof of = true; continue
130: If all Pi_OSC promotion = BS; END
Face it TT911 - only a whacker would come to a major forum asking the naive to part with $397 for a "system" that trades a couple of times a year, offering nothing as evidence that it actually works.
A couple of coloured lines at the top and bottom of the market is supposed to be proof?
Who's the expert in photoshop now?
Instead, we get this: "Sorry I have more important things to do than to post images" ... but you DO have time to compose lengthy gibberish posts.
I don't think the jury needs any directions from the judge to bring down a finding in this case.
But ... I say again ... Good luck with the promotion ... we have not heard the last of it, have we?
:cheesy:
