I would be interested in input on how people manage risk and reward on overnight Gap trades, particularly how they size the position. This is not an area I have really tried and have not done much analysis on it.
Grey1 has mentioned in the past taking positions overnight, I think based on OS/OB conditions into the close. I can see that you can analyse a stock to establish a positive expectancy in certain conditions of MACCI or whatever, but how do people then size the position?
I think there are two broad requirements
a) Balancing positions taken on different days and different stocks so that all trades have a roughly equal risk and reward (in similar fashion to the way we position size intra day using our chosen ATR or whatever). This presumably comes out fairly automatically from any statistical analysis of positive expectancy.
b) Assess the worst case or "worst likely case" senario to avoid a serious loss. Surely any historical analysis of today's current list of core stocks for "fat tails" still carries survivorship bias at least.
Grey1 has mentioned in the past taking positions overnight, I think based on OS/OB conditions into the close. I can see that you can analyse a stock to establish a positive expectancy in certain conditions of MACCI or whatever, but how do people then size the position?
I think there are two broad requirements
a) Balancing positions taken on different days and different stocks so that all trades have a roughly equal risk and reward (in similar fashion to the way we position size intra day using our chosen ATR or whatever). This presumably comes out fairly automatically from any statistical analysis of positive expectancy.
b) Assess the worst case or "worst likely case" senario to avoid a serious loss. Surely any historical analysis of today's current list of core stocks for "fat tails" still carries survivorship bias at least.