Best Thread Keynes Vs. Hayek

  • Thread starter Thread starter 0007
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 26
new_trader said:
Basic economics you say? I will make this simple so that even you can understand. The UK imports twice as much as it exports. The U.K is now a net importer of oil and food. These are commodities that are produced outside of the U.K. When the Central Bank increases the money supply it devalues the currency at the same time, this is called debasement. What this means is that anything the UK imports will be more expensive due to a depreciated currency. If you don’t believe me then perhaps you will believe Andrew Sentance - External Member of the Monetary Policy Committee:
Yes agreed. Do you also agree that what we export is cheaper?
"Why has inflation turned out persistently above target, despite the widespread expectation that it would be pushed down by the financial crisis and the global recession?" The answer, he argues, is that "too much faith is being put on the impact of a large 'output gap' pushing down on inflation and not enough weight has been put on the upward pressure from the global environment and the exchange rate".
This isn't news mate. Been arguing that we will have inflation and that in high probability this is government policy to lighten the debt burden on borrowers. I agree. But do you understand the objective of this policy instead of beating us to death with your debasement and gold standard. I accept I agree and long term we should revert back. Simply not now...
Fourth, and most importantly, Andrew Sentance says that in an open economy like the UK the 'output gap' model of inflation pays insufficient attention to the global forces shaping UK inflation No ****. What do you think the other side of making exports cheaper is. Importing inflation. Well done. Top marks.. "A key driver behind the upward pressure on prices in global markets has been strong global economic growth Tempted to say sod off here... More like rise in oil and commodity prices due to economic growth in the far east. (unless ofcourse this is what you mean by global growth and not contraction in the West)., particularly driven by Asia and other emerging markets", he says. Moreover, "Forecasts of future global growth are now being revised up again.". Dr Sentance concludes that "...global inflationary pressures look set to continue and with them above-target UK inflation.

Agree and we may well get hyper-inflation too. Never said anything againts...

He concludes by saying that, while the exchange rate should clearly not become the centrepiece of UK monetary policy, the value of sterling "...needs to be one of the key areas of focus for the MPC as we seek to steer ourselves out of the current phase of high inflation". A modest appreciation of sterling, he argues, ".would mitigate the impact of global inflationary pressures in the short term and help to steer inflation back to the target over the medium term".

Exchange rates are NOT centrepiece of UK monetary policy. It is control of inflation. Exchange rates are consequence of interest rate, inflation and BoP...
Give up Atilla 🙄
Click to expand...

I don't see it as competition. You see there are many factors, that go to make a cake. But some factors are more significant than others. You need to use your intellect to judge. Dropping names of these people is only an opinion. Not necessarily the right one.

You don't really understand dependancies, impacts and consequences of all these points do you?
 
there was a great programme about the effects of taxpayer funded stimulus, big governments etc... it also used HK as an example of what can be done. If I find it I'll post.
 
If the bigwigs of USA, UK, France etc could stop mouthing off on this subject of which they know next to nothing and have a look at the better economic examples like Korea, Singapore. Hong Kong etc. then they might get the ball rolling in the right direction imho.

Gordon Brown, that self proclaimed guru, is now thankfully quiet. So much for his 5 golden principles etc.
 
Atilla said:
No you understood totally wrong. Your mind is like smash potatoes with a mixture of peas. Keep taking the medicine... 😉
Click to expand...

Obviously if you have debt you wouldn't substitute leisure for work until debt is paid off. Where did this come from...
Click to expand...

You stated that when the books are balanced, that you would cut taxes. This equates to cutting income. The debt isn't going to be paid off any time soon, so why would you even consider cutting taxes (income) when times are good? It's the opposite of what you should do, because as you point out debt needs to be paid off. In fact taxes should be raised in good economic times.

"Obviously if you have debt"... well the government does. This is a fact. Any discussion about not having the debt is irrelevant. So again, why cut taxes just because on a particular year, our government might be running a surplus? If you're suggesting that balanced books means there is no total debt either, then your point again is irrelevant, because we can't be in that position for a long time, if ever.

The point is as people become well off and cash rich by working harder they don't do more hours. They simply work less hard. Someone earning less money works weekends and BHolidays and in some cases two jobs.
Click to expand...

Are we having a discussion about what people do, or what people SHOULD do? Suppose times are good and I can earn £20 per hour for work, and I am aware that in a few years I may not be able to earn much or at all, AND I have debts. Then yes I work harder now while times are good and pay off my debt. I don't have any debt, eliminating any debt asap is one of my priorities, and I'll work 3 jobs to pay it off if I need to. Again, as you say some people in that position will work less hard. They may have to suffer the repercussions of that choice. We're all suffering the repercussions now of our governments 'leisure time'

It's interesting that I gave an analogy comparing your philosophy of what governments should do (cutting taxes etc), with an individual in a similar position. And on reading it you realise it's a ridiculous philosophy for the individual. But for some reason your head is clouded with economic concepts, which stop you from seeing the obvious. The policy that you espouse IS ridiculous. Whether it be for an individual working, or for a government.
 
spreader_legger said:
I think that the conservatives critique over the period was better to cut taxes and let the private sector allocate resources as opposed to wasteful public spending ..... where the country won't see any future returns
Click to expand...

Well my taxes have gone up. PLus with the high inflation, my money has been devalued which compounds the effect. And yet wasteful spending still seems to be going strong.
 
No doubt ... but it takes time to reform public sector & change the overall culture.

PS ... I am by no means a Tory, but neither am I a Blairite

Shakone said:
Well my taxes have gone up. PLus with the high inflation, my money has been devalued which compounds the effect. And yet wasteful spending still seems to be going strong.
Click to expand...
 
Shakone said:
You stated that when the books are balanced, that you would cut taxes. This equates to cutting income. The debt isn't going to be paid off any time soon, so why would you even consider cutting taxes (income) when times are good? It's the opposite of what you should do, because as you point out debt needs to be paid off. In fact taxes should be raised in good economic times.
Click to expand...


Its not as simple as that. Different tax cuts will have different stimulative effects. You may find a situation that through tax cuts you actually stimulate the economy and increase revenue. This is what is referred to as the infamous Laffer curve.

You can for instance pursue a policy similar to Ireland's and attract FDI, foreign investments increased jobs + exports by pursuing a low corporation tax strategy. Indeed the Irish vehemently defended this during their IMF bailout package

Plenty other examples abound ..... but I guess you get the drift
 
Shakone said:
You stated that when the books are balanced, that you would cut taxes. This equates to cutting income. The debt isn't going to be paid off any time soon, so why would you even consider cutting taxes (income) when times are good? I fail to understand. How can the books be balanced if one has debt. Applies to Gov or Individuals. It's the opposite of what you should do, because as you point out debt needs to be paid off. In fact taxes should be raised in good economic times. Why? If you run large surplus like Japan or China you are taking money out of the system. Balanced books is the objective not surplus or defecits. You may choose to raise taxation in good times and spend in recession but this leads to boom bust scenarios.

"Obviously if you have debt"... well the government does. This is a fact. Any discussion about not having the debt is irrelevant. So again, why cut taxes just because on a particular year, our government might be running a surplus? If you're suggesting that balanced books means there is no total debt either, then your point again is irrelevant, because we can't be in that position for a long time, if ever. Let's apply your arguement to what today. If you spend more than you earn you raise debt. If you then complement that by taxing less you are encouraging greater disparity between earning and expenditure -> even more debt. This is why Keynesian approach fails. Politicians will spend out of recession and continue spending on in a boom cutting taxes. You can't have it both ways.

What is your objection to;
1. Raising taxes
2. Reducing spending

to pay off debt. What part of the logic do you object to. The rest of the geezers banging their drum about lower taxes making people work harder is tosh.

Think how you would respond to the stimulus. (assuming you have no debt but savings too. Would you really work twice as hard)?

Are we having a discussion about what people do, or what people SHOULD do? Suppose times are good and I can earn £20 per hour for work, and I am aware that in a few years I may not be able to earn much or at all, AND I have debts. Then yes I work harder now while times are good and pay off my debt. Look mate - If you have debt you are not well off alright. Have can you class people in debt as well off??? If your assets > liabilities and you are in positive equity then you're ok I don't have any debt, eliminating any debt asap is one of my priorities, and I'll work 3 jobs to pay it off if I need to. Again, as you say some people in that position will work less hard. They may have to suffer the repercussions of that choice. We're all suffering the repercussions now of our governments 'leisure time'. So when will you ease off work? Ask this question will you then continue working as hard. Would more money make you work harder. Taxes go down are you going to say - oh taxes went down I can earn more money. Don't know how much you earn but let's say you earn £50-100K and this range is not unusual to many people in Banking... +bonuses on top. You going to want to work on BH and weekends doing OT?

It's interesting that I gave an analogy comparing your philosophy of what governments should do (cutting taxes etc), with an individual in a similar position. And on reading it you realise it's a ridiculous philosophy for the individual. But for some reason your head is clouded with economic concepts, which stop you from seeing the obvious. The policy that you espouse IS ridiculous. Whether it be for an individual working, or for a government. No you didn't. You conjured up some daft assumption with debt saying you are well off.
Click to expand...

Giving up the will to live...

Look policy is simple...

1. Raise Taxes
2. Reduce Spending
3. Mild inflation > interest rates

Hey presto debt paid off in no time.

Anything else is pissing in the wind...
 
spreader_legger said:
Its not as simple as that. Different tax cuts will have different stimulative effects. You may find a situation that through tax cuts you actually stimulate the economy and increase revenue. This is what is referred to as the infamous Laffer curve.

You can for instance pursue a policy similar to Ireland's and attract FDI, foreign investments increased jobs + exports by pursuing a low corporation tax strategy. Indeed the Irish vehemently defended this during their IMF bailout package

Plenty other examples abound ..... but I guess you get the drift
Click to expand...

Agreed. Which in my opinion is why you need to reduce taxes and stimulate when times are bad, not increase. Also since you can't always reduce taxes, or they would converge to zero, you have to have a time when you increase taxes. When is the time to do this?

In my opinion the best time to do that is when times are good, booming in fact. It will it will have far less of a negative impact at that time, and the revenues will be increased more dramatically then. Which is why I disagreed with Atilla, that you cut taxes when the yearly books are balanced and debt outstanding.
 
Last edited:
Atilla said:
Giving up the will to live...

Look policy is simple...

1. Raise Taxes
2. Reduce Spending
3. Mild inflation > interest rates

Hey presto debt paid off in no time.

Anything else is pissing in the wind...
Click to expand...

Are you a simpleton?
 
Shakone said:
Agreed. Which in my opinion is why you need to reduce taxes and stimulate when times are bad, not increase. Also since you can't always reduce taxes, or they would converge to zero, you have to have a time when you increase taxes. When is the time to do this?

In my opinion the best time to do that is when times are good, booming in fact. It will it will have far less of a negative impact at that time, and the revenues will be increased more dramatically then. Which is why I disagreed with Atilla, that you cut taxes when the yearly books are balanced and debt outstanding.

Invest when things are low,
Click to expand...

Beg to differ.

As mentioned before should Greece be cutting taxes to get their economy moving?

UK same scenario... We are in debt.

US same scenario in debt.

How much does it cost to service those trillions of billions of debt.

So you are in debt and you cut taxes -> increase debt.

This political crap about reducing Government foot print and spending and letting people decide how to spend monies is pie in the sky right now.

Totally ignores the debt.

Tax cuts will only compound our debt issue. Does no one see this BIG problem.

Bunch of parrots repeating

tax cuts
tax cuts
tax cuts... :cheesy:
 
In a car, the break pedal slows you down, the throttle pedal speeds you up. It doesn't matter if you are going uphill or downhill, the pedals do the same thing.

As it is with taxes and the private sector. More taxes slow you down, growth in the private sector speeds you up. If you are going downhill, release the break pedal, and let gravity take care of the rest.
 
Atilla said:
Giving up the will to live...

Look policy is simple...

1. Raise Taxes
2. Reduce Spending
3. Mild inflation > interest rates

Hey presto debt paid off in no time.

Anything else is pissing in the wind...
Click to expand...

Ok, so your policy is to reduce taxes when the UK has no debt and is running a surplus. Useful...in a century or so. Maybe. Do you not realise how long the debt is going to be with us? So what's the point in arguing a case for something that isn't going to happen. It isn't going to be paid off for a long long time.

You say Keynesian approach doesn't work, because politicians spend out of recession and spend in boom times. This is not the Keynesian approach as I understand it. Under Keynesian approach you spend during recession, and recoup during boom. It's not Keynesian approach that has failed, because that hasn't even been tried. It's the failure of politicans and government to follow a proper plan. I mentioned why in my first post.

You ask if someone earning 50-100K would work more, bank holidays weekends etc. Well many people already do, but yes I would, and yes I have. I've worked a second job, despite my main job salary being at the lower end of the range you suggest. This attitude has kept me out of debt, contributing to society, and with moderate savings. I don't think the UK government can boast the same. I'll be putting my ethics of money, debt, work and savings ahead of the governments, thanks.
 
What taxes do you propose to raise?? Remember that some taxes will have a short term inflationary impact ..... & if times are good I presume that pressures on prices will already be high.

In the case of Ireland, messing around with things like corporation tax would just lead to uncertainty & reduced likelihood of future investment.

Remember that taxes will tend to have a distortionary effect on allocation of resources .... I also assume you don't intend to spend the proceeds on wacky wasteful social ventures Blair undertook & which we are paying for today.

PS I am convinced that Blair is what economists refer to as a negative externality 😆

Shakone said:
Agreed. Which in my opinion is why you need to reduce taxes and stimulate when times are bad, not increase. Also since you can't always reduce taxes, or they would converge to zero, you have to have a time when you increase taxes. When is the time to do this?

In my opinion the best time to do that is when times are good, booming in fact. It will it will have far less of a negative impact at that time, and the revenues will be increased more dramatically then. Which is why I disagreed with Atilla, that you cut taxes when the yearly books are balanced and debt outstanding.

Invest when things are low,
Click to expand...
 
Atilla said:
Beg to differ.

As mentioned before should Greece be cutting taxes to get their economy moving?

UK same scenario... We are in debt.

US same scenario in debt.

How much does it cost to service those trillions of billions of debt.

So you are in debt and you cut taxes -> increase debt.

This political crap about reducing Government foot print and spending and letting people decide how to spend monies is pie in the sky right now.

Totally ignores the debt.

Tax cuts will only compound our debt issue. Does no one see this BIG problem.

Bunch of parrots repeating

tax cuts
tax cuts
tax cuts... :cheesy:
Click to expand...

It's fine to differ. We can all have opinions. But some facts. My taxes have gone up. Debt has risen too, hasn't it? So what is your point?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Sharky
  • Sticky
Featured T2W Best Threads
Replies
2
Views
9K
Sharky
Sharky
timsk
Trader Interviews
2
Replies
34
Views
16K
Trader333
Trader333
D
New Paper Suggesting BTC is a Prototype to be Replaced
Replies
4
Views
3K
Quantt
Quantt
R
RamallahCC's blog
Replies
1
Views
2K
kingstukie
K
wasp
Uk
2 3
Replies
41
Views
14K
JTrader
JTrader
Back
Top