I see your point but I am not aware that pivot points breaks of R1 and S1 give a 90% success rate. In fact I know from trying to trade this way that it is at best 50%. You may well be right though as it cannot be something that is that complicated.
I think they mean that if the entry point is hit, the index will move 10 points in the right direction 90% of the time at some point in the day. But they are not kean to mention it could move 60 points in the wrong direction first.
Using a spread bet company I can't see how this strategy will work. 10 points can be lost in the spread and bias.
If the initial stop is hit, you are 20 points down and they say to re-enter when the entry point is hit again.
There might be a 90% chance of making 10 points but it might cost 60 points to make it.
The main point is, if it did work, why would they be selling it?
In 2000 I went on a free trading seminar. The man called himself PJ and claimed to have a system that worked 88% of the time. It was based on Chinese candlesticks. He was very impressive but I decided not to go on the full day course. It cost £500 and I thought he was making more money teaching than trading. If you look at this page from the Motley Fool you will see that some people who went on the course were impressed but there were problems implementing his strategy and there are no posts from people using it successfully.
If you believe the statements made on the website then you cannot lose 60 points before making the 10 points because they state that a stoploss is set at 20 points. So you would be out of the trade losing 20 points but only 10% of the time. The way I understand it is that if the entry price is hit then there is a 90% chance that you will make 10 points before the market reverses by 20 points from your entry price. But maybe I have missed something and in any case I am very sceptical of any claims like this although the 30 day free trial is unusual for a system if it doesnt work. I would still like to hear from someone who has given this a go.
I too was intrigued by what these ''Chinese Figures" could be. So I did a little back testing using the OHLC figures and the Buy and Sell points they give on the site.
I looked at 8 months of Ftse data (Jan-Feb 03, Jan-Mar 02, Jan - Feb 00, Jan 98) and four Dow months (Jan- Feb 98, Jan- Feb 03). Got bored after that....
Anyway I compared their numbers with Pivot Points as hinted at by Paul (Trader333). It turns out that their Buy Trigger is always 1, 2 or 3 points higher than R1 and their Sell trigger is always 15, 16 or 17 points above S1. Strangely this was true for both Ftse (prices in sample ranged from 3,500 to 6,900) and Dow (prices from 7,600 to 8,800).
I couldn't work out any rationale for when they added which of the three corrections. But it would appear that the precise trigger point isn't that crucial anyway. They advise on their How we Trade page that if you can't watch the screen"To minimise risk, it is safer to move the target entry price a further 10 points away". Apart from being a bit ambiguous (away from what?) it seems an oddly loose instruction.
The worst bit about this lot is they use the most possible points obtainable in their records. To do this, you would have to know the exact high or low of the index you are trading each day. That would be better than winning the lottery and a lot less likely.
They say they are looking for 10 points each day, then they use figures that are impossible to achieve.
It must be easy money for them. All they do is get the pivot points, add the points and sell the numbers to their subscribers.