1963Falcon
Well-known member
- Messages
- 281
- Likes
- 4
If you don't elieve ten you will only have to wait about one month. It is about to get crazy for Forex and everything else..
If you don't elieve ten you will only have to wait about one month. It is about to get crazy for Forex and everything else..
Spot on mate.Well here you go.
Are they the people who DON'T believe the world is flat?The globalists
Imo it all depends on your abilities in the critical thinking department. If you can easily identify an area of contention or interest then one post will probably do but if not then it's a question of the more the merrier, rather like trading books where the essence of the 200+ pages of drivel that one pays for can actually be expressed on a couple of pages of A4. Then again if you're a syncretism enthusiast with time on your hands you can start with the W questions (What When Why Whow etc) and then move on to matters more arcane; Was Bayes really gay and what effect did that have on his researches? Was his data flawed because of religious bias? Why did he choose to wear jodhpurs long before they were popular? And how can the answers to these questions truly add to the corpus of statistical and critical analysis literature in a meaningful way? Underpinning the whole field is (of course) the matter of representation - can one truly communicate meaning using a single medium? Is choice of font (and colour) a determinant or merely an extraneous factor to be ignored*? The gist of Bayesian statistics is not difficult to grasp. At its base is the intuitive idea that probability quantifies the 'degree of belief in an event (in this context, an event is whatever can be precisely described by a proposition). Now, degrees of belief can be framed in a mathematical structure which allows the probability of an event A to be calculated on the basis of the probability of other events logically connected to that event A. (including those engendered by deliberately irritating forum posts) In particular, the probability of event A changes if other events are assumed to be'true', provided these other events are 'stochastically dependent' on event A.This is the essence of Bayes' theorem. As a consequence, Bayesian statistics allows the probability of a hypothesis-event to be continually updated on the basis of new observation-events that depend on that hypothesis-event. Most likely this is not the way you were t a u g h t (elements of) probability theory. At most you might have been warned about the existence of a 'subjective probability' as an 'interpretation of probability', helpful in many fields, b u t definitively not applicable in Science where 'you want to be objective'. So there you have it, everything you thought you knew is probably completely wrong or flawed and everything you think you're going to learn is (in all probability), even worse. Simples.posts?
Could you repost that in shorter lengths so the average Tesla trader can understand it.Imo it all depends on your abilities in the critical thinking department. If you can easily identify an area of contention or interest then one post will probably do but if not then it's a question of the more the merrier, rather like trading books where the essence of the 200+ pages of drivel that one pays for can actually be expressed on a couple of pages of A4. Then again if you're a syncretism enthusiast with time on your hands you can start with the W questions (What When Why Whow etc) and then move on to matters more arcane; Was Bayes really gay and what effect did that have on his researches? Was his data flawed because of religious bias? Why did he choose to wear jodhpurs long before they were popular? And how can the answers to these questions truly add to the corpus of statistical and critical analysis literature in a meaningful way? Underpinning the whole field is (of course) the matter of representation - can one truly communicate meaning using a single medium? Is choice of font (and colour) a determinant or merely an extraneous factor to be ignored*? The gist of Bayesian statistics is not difficult to grasp. At its base is the intuitive idea that probability quantifies the 'degree of belief in an event (in this context, an event is whatever can be precisely described by a proposition). Now, degrees of belief can be framed in a mathematical structure which allows the probability of an event A to be calculated on the basis of the probability of other events logically connected to that event A. (including those engendered by deliberately irritating forum posts) In particular, the probability of event A changes if other events are assumed to be'true', provided these other events are 'stochastically dependent' on event A.This is the essence of Bayes' theorem. As a consequence, Bayesian statistics allows the probability of a hypothesis-event to be continually updated on the basis of new observation-events that depend on that hypothesis-event. Most likely this is not the way you were t a u g h t (elements of) probability theory. At most you might have been warned about the existence of a 'subjective probability' as an 'interpretation of probability', helpful in many fields, b u t definitively not applicable in Science where 'you want to be objective'. So there you have it, everything you thought you knew is probably completely wrong or flawed and everything you think you're going to learn is (in all probability), even worse. Simples.
I'm sure that answers your question....and since you asked: Mine's a double. Ta.
*like the majority of posts on T2W
No I didn't - I just know how to plagiarize. Most of it's lifted from a book on the Rev.* and the rest from less famous scribblings elsewhere and besides, you seem to have time on your hands yerself.Could you repost that in shorter lengths so the average Tesla trader can understand it.
I don't think I know enough words of one syllable
I checked, you typed all that out yourself,
Aksherly, I walk a lot ...and I do mean a lot. Even before lockdown I was roaming the streets. Just got back from walkie n°2 - about 5 miles or so. I usually do between 10 and 15 a day during the week and more at the weekends - keeps me AFK'd and avoids unnecessary conversation with Mrs too. What's not to like?you really need to get out more. Oh wait you cant we're in lockdown, my bad.
Why is the USD going up as Biden is going the White HouseIf you don't elieve ten you will only have to wait about one month. It is about to get crazy for Forex and everything else..
What makes you say that?Well apparently Biden is getting in tomorrow...and the USD is apparently going to get stronger still for the first 6 months or a year and then it going down big.
What happened?If you don't elieve ten you will only have to wait about one month. It is about to get crazy for Forex and everything else..
Why you will sell all?I just closed all trades and I have 137 dollars in one account and 149 dollars on another account. When the Eurou reaches 1.22 then I am selling all in...
If only there was a way to reach everyone in every country in the world in order to 'inform' them of what is going on. I am waiting for some genius to maybe link all the computers in the world together so they could all talk to each other then the whole world could share this wonderful information and the markets would crash.I will say that the Euro is still fiat and US dollar is still crap and fiat so it is still a race to the bottom. When peep realize what is going on then gold and silver will boom...LOL