All Hell is about to break loose

1963Falcon

Well-known member
Messages
281
Likes
4
If you don't elieve ten you will only have to wait about one month. It is about to get crazy for Forex and everything else..
 
Well here you go.

Is this crazy enough or wait for several more months...

You not have to wait one month now...LOL

The USD is about to get stronger even though the whole world hates it...

So Biden is in and it is about get ugly here but the USD is due for a correction.

Apparently the globalists either agree or they can't stop us.

It looks like the USD is getting stronger for now

I am watching the one and five minute chart for the eur/usd and it is pretty amazing.

The globalists are trying to take everyone's m p Nye as usual...but people are starting to be more educated and fight back.

This is a battle between. Globalism and. Nationalism...

The globalists will spend any amount of money to succeed.

The globalists

Will lose any.

Any amount. Necessary to accomplish.

Their goals.

We can win together.
 
Imo it all depends on your abilities in the critical thinking department. If you can easily identify an area of contention or interest then one post will probably do but if not then it's a question of the more the merrier, rather like trading books where the essence of the 200+ pages of drivel that one pays for can actually be expressed on a couple of pages of A4. Then again if you're a syncretism enthusiast with time on your hands you can start with the W questions (What When Why Whow etc) and then move on to matters more arcane; Was Bayes really gay and what effect did that have on his researches? Was his data flawed because of religious bias? Why did he choose to wear jodhpurs long before they were popular? And how can the answers to these questions truly add to the corpus of statistical and critical analysis literature in a meaningful way? Underpinning the whole field is (of course) the matter of representation - can one truly communicate meaning using a single medium? Is choice of font (and colour) a determinant or merely an extraneous factor to be ignored*? The gist of Bayesian statistics is not difficult to grasp. At its base is the intuitive idea that probability quantifies the 'degree of belief in an event (in this context, an event is whatever can be precisely described by a proposition). Now, degrees of belief can be framed in a mathematical structure which allows the probability of an event A to be calculated on the basis of the probability of other events logically connected to that event A. (including those engendered by deliberately irritating forum posts) In particular, the probability of event A changes if other events are assumed to be'true', provided these other events are 'stochastically dependent' on event A.This is the essence of Bayes' theorem. As a consequence, Bayesian statistics allows the probability of a hypothesis-event to be continually updated on the basis of new observation-events that depend on that hypothesis-event. Most likely this is not the way you were t a u g h t (elements of) probability theory. At most you might have been warned about the existence of a 'subjective probability' as an 'interpretation of probability', helpful in many fields, b u t definitively not applicable in Science where 'you want to be objective'. So there you have it, everything you thought you knew is probably completely wrong or flawed and everything you think you're going to learn is (in all probability), even worse. Simples.

I'm sure that answers your question....and since you asked: Mine's a double. Ta.



*like the majority of posts on T2W
 
Imo it all depends on your abilities in the critical thinking department. If you can easily identify an area of contention or interest then one post will probably do but if not then it's a question of the more the merrier, rather like trading books where the essence of the 200+ pages of drivel that one pays for can actually be expressed on a couple of pages of A4. Then again if you're a syncretism enthusiast with time on your hands you can start with the W questions (What When Why Whow etc) and then move on to matters more arcane; Was Bayes really gay and what effect did that have on his researches? Was his data flawed because of religious bias? Why did he choose to wear jodhpurs long before they were popular? And how can the answers to these questions truly add to the corpus of statistical and critical analysis literature in a meaningful way? Underpinning the whole field is (of course) the matter of representation - can one truly communicate meaning using a single medium? Is choice of font (and colour) a determinant or merely an extraneous factor to be ignored*? The gist of Bayesian statistics is not difficult to grasp. At its base is the intuitive idea that probability quantifies the 'degree of belief in an event (in this context, an event is whatever can be precisely described by a proposition). Now, degrees of belief can be framed in a mathematical structure which allows the probability of an event A to be calculated on the basis of the probability of other events logically connected to that event A. (including those engendered by deliberately irritating forum posts) In particular, the probability of event A changes if other events are assumed to be'true', provided these other events are 'stochastically dependent' on event A.This is the essence of Bayes' theorem. As a consequence, Bayesian statistics allows the probability of a hypothesis-event to be continually updated on the basis of new observation-events that depend on that hypothesis-event. Most likely this is not the way you were t a u g h t (elements of) probability theory. At most you might have been warned about the existence of a 'subjective probability' as an 'interpretation of probability', helpful in many fields, b u t definitively not applicable in Science where 'you want to be objective'. So there you have it, everything you thought you knew is probably completely wrong or flawed and everything you think you're going to learn is (in all probability), even worse. Simples.

I'm sure that answers your question....and since you asked: Mine's a double. Ta.



*like the majority of posts on T2W
Could you repost that in shorter lengths so the average Tesla trader can understand it.

I checked, you typed all that out yourself, you really need to get out more. Oh wait you cant we're in lockdown, my bad.
 
Could you repost that in shorter lengths so the average Tesla trader can understand it.
I don't think I know enough words of one syllable
I checked, you typed all that out yourself,
No I didn't - I just know how to plagiarize. Most of it's lifted from a book on the Rev.* and the rest from less famous scribblings elsewhere and besides, you seem to have time on your hands yerself.

you really need to get out more. Oh wait you cant we're in lockdown, my bad.
Aksherly, I walk a lot ...and I do mean a lot. Even before lockdown I was roaming the streets. Just got back from walkie n°2 - about 5 miles or so. I usually do between 10 and 15 a day during the week and more at the weekends - keeps me AFK'd and avoids unnecessary conversation with Mrs too. What's not to like?

*happy to attach it if that floats your boat.
 
Fiat money is death, and we find ourselves in an open war for control of digital money. That's what all this is about.

They have created a global crisis to generate a subsequent irrecoverable hyper-inflation and give the final touch to the fiat currency.

The circus of the elections, the virus .. Everything is a great distraction, a screen similar to the "technical difficulties" standby splash of the Simpsons (cracks me up everytime) so that we remain distracted while they decide the winner who will implement this new digital world with digital money, digital ID, strong global socialism, population control and elimination of private property.

The davos forum has already said, "you will own nothing and you will be happy". However, for some strange reason I feel that this principle will not be applied to themselves, that they will be happy and also have things.

What the hell, better grab some popcorn.
 
Last edited:
Well apparently Biden is getting in tomorrow...and the USD is apparently going to get stronger still for the first 6 months or a year and then it going down big.

That will be sad...

Everybody start selling at 1.22 and we will see if we can make a difference against globalism. I love every one and their culture...

We will see what we can do as peons....

I just closed all trades and I have 137 dollars in one account and 149 dollars on another account. When the Eurou reaches 1.22 then I am selling all in...

We can do this together...

kers never win......LOL
 
My wife always says that I am early...

I am always early but the USD is going to make a comeback for one last time...


V

I would say sell EROUS...

They are going down hard...

They are a fiat currency and are based on nothing
 
I will say that the Euro is still fiat and US dollar is still crap and fiat so it is still a race to the bottom. When peep realize what is going on then gold and silver will boom...LOL
 
I will say that the Euro is still fiat and US dollar is still crap and fiat so it is still a race to the bottom. When peep realize what is going on then gold and silver will boom...LOL
If only there was a way to reach everyone in every country in the world in order to 'inform' them of what is going on. I am waiting for some genius to maybe link all the computers in the world together so they could all talk to each other then the whole world could share this wonderful information and the markets would crash.
Technology will bring the markets down. 🤣
 
Top