- Status
counter_violent
Legendary member
- Messages
- 12,672
- Likes
- 3,787
Which mods? I thought all that was sorted out !!!
counter_violent
Legendary member
- Messages
- 12,672
- Likes
- 3,787
Been away for a bit, just catching up...looks like the usual members report posts, mods have to act on report posts, all comes down to who's doing the reporting....members mod then mods mod, that pretty much sums up how it works.
Every member's viewpoint is completely different
Course, the mods just get blamed for everything !!!!!!!
itspossible
Senior member
- Messages
- 2,796
- Likes
- 570
Their goes my thread then
Their goes my thread then
I'm sorry that that happened to Pat Riley.
Trader333
Moderator
- Messages
- 8,753
- Likes
- 1,026
Their goes my thread then
Only if reported and deemed in the same light as we don't go actively searching for this sort of thing.
Pat Riley
Established member
- Messages
- 794
- Likes
- 178
Trader333
Moderator
- Messages
- 8,753
- Likes
- 1,026
If they are reported they are also addressed and have been on many occasions but again we don't go looking for them.
I thought Pat's posts were amusement. Maybe I'm missing something but I'm sure the stuff I did see wasn't targeting me.
Arguments about whether a contributor is making real trades or just bluffing (like anglers' arguments about the one that got away) are part of the game I thought but maybe there was more going on here?
Arguments about whether a contributor is making real trades or just bluffing (like anglers' arguments about the one that got away) are part of the game I thought but maybe there was more going on here?
Trader333
Moderator
- Messages
- 8,753
- Likes
- 1,026
OK I will ask CV to look at the thread and if he thinks it is ok it will be reinstated.
alexaherself
Established member
- Messages
- 560
- Likes
- 149
I'm sorry to hear it. I'd be a little more confident about the forum's survival if reports from logged-in members were even anonymous, so that it couldn't possibly ever come down to "who's doing the reporting", and had at least some pretence of or aspiration towards objectivity.
It surely ought to be about the content of the report, and a moderator's assessment of the post/thread complained about, rather than about "who sent it"?
Been away for a bit, just catching up...looks like the usual members report posts, mods have to act on report posts, all comes down to who's doing the reporting....members mod then mods mod, that pretty much sums up how it works.
Every member's viewpoint is completely different
Course, the mods just get blamed for everything !!!!!!!
Surely is not easy and I sympathise with you guys but I think you also have to entertain the idea to delete others thread were the spread of BS is daily distributed, otherwise the actual forum will became a joke.
The crude reality is that a charlatan creates movement and readership and based on that the forum is able to sell advertising space...... but in the long run when the non charlatan will withdraw from the site (rightly) you are only left with charlatans and not readership, so if I was you (forum) I would look at quality than quantity, it is your responsibility as is ours (members) to filter the nonsense.
tar
Legendary member
- Messages
- 10,443
- Likes
- 1,314
Its nice to be free ...
M
malaguti
agreed, only recently 15000 pips per month is now quite attainable.
what message does this spread to everyone visiting this site? what does that say of the quality
Why don't we all start threads spreading this same b/s and don't have to held accountable for it
this is exactly what other forum members are attempting to do, but they have the thread deleted, said in an amusing way and quite frankly who cares whether it was the same person but under a different guise
these things really do need to be said
if the forum can't attain to higher standards, what then of the members
- Status
