Likely trigger of world war three?

[JTrader]

Strange no reference to USA on the extensive list :!:

the US R the good guys. they dont start war they finish wars.
Basic fundamental ideology of the illuminati atilla - come on u know that!

 

[Atilla]

the US R the good guys. they dont start war they finish wars.
Basic fundamental ideology of the illuminati atilla - come on u know that!

Ooopss sorry... quite right...

1. I was thinking Mehico will one day claim back Texas and the oil fields

2. Russia will claim back Alaska


No doubt US will finish them both off to eternity... :whistling

 

[JTrader]

soemone gets some du from a former soviet block scientist who stashed some in his garden shed when the commos fell. builds a durtty bomb and hey presto u have a gret big hole where a city used to be.

 

[BSD]

Now that they've decided to rebuild the old Imperial Palace in Berlin that the GDR had torn down Germany wants Mrs. Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha back but Boris won't let her go because she's good for tourism.

 

[arabianights]

Oh BSD, you stirer!

 

[rathcoole_exile]

how about youse agree to slip quietly into the Empire, and we'll say no more about it.
Then we can all invade France

 

[JTrader]

I firmly beilieve that the cause will not be the use of the following words -

sh it
tw at
fu ck
cu nt
bug gar
bas tard
wh ore
sl ag

 

[MrGecko]

remarkable how much fun one can have with a Speak 'n Spell, isn't it.

 

[chilltrader]

Water... with Egypt up there on the list of those likely to start the thing...

of course, this is ideal: If you're going to have a world war, the third world is an ideal place to have it, there's bugger all there.

Agreed.. third world is where the next world war will start.. i.e places like Hull, Western-S-Mare, Hackney etc

 

[arabianights]

The lord of weston super mare might disagree with you

When I was a student, I got thrown out a restaurant for heckling him when he was going on about integrity having just got out of gaol (he lives in grantchester, don't-ya-know).

 

[arabianights]

Then we can all invade France

I've always thought we should have been on the German's side in WW1.

Advantages:

1. Keep empire
2. Teach French a lesson
3. Prevent WWII
4. Prevent communism

Disadvantages:

1.

 

[zigglewigler]

the first 7 world wars (ie multi-continent, multi-country participants) were all started by France.
The wars we know of as WW-I and WW-II should correctly be labelled WW-VIII and WW-IX

No sign of a new Napoleon, yet, but considering the UK fought on the "wrong side" in the last two world wars, I wouldn't bet against the French upsetting the apple-cart again

THE NAPOLEONIC WARS WERE STARTED BY THE AUSTRIANS, PRUSSIANS, AND THE BRITISH WITH OTHER MINOR SUPPORTERS, ALL PART OF A EUROPE WIDE COALITION OF MONARCHIES INTENT ON REVERSING THE FRENCH REVOLUTION AND RE-INSTALLING A KING. THE PRIVILEGED CLASSES THROUGHOUT THE CONTINENT DIDN'T LIKE THE IDEA OF COMMON PEOPLE HAVING ANY REAL SAY IN THEIR LIVES, THIS IS WHAT NAPOLEON WAS DEFENDING. HE MAY HAVE GOT CARRIED AWAY WITH HIMSELF, LATER BECOMING EMPEROR, BUT HE WAS NO HITLER.

 

[arabianights]

THE NAPOLEONIC WARS WERE STARTED BY THE AUSTRIANS, PRUSSIANS, AND THE BRITISH WITH OTHER MINOR SUPPORTERS, ALL PART OF A EUROPE WIDE COALITION OF MONARCHIES INTENT ON REVERSING THE FRENCH REVOLUTION AND RE-INSTALLING A KING. THE PRIVILEGED CLASSES THROUGHOUT THE CONTINENT DIDN'T LIKE THE IDEA OF COMMON PEOPLE HAVING ANY REAL SAY IN THEIR LIVES, THIS IS WHAT NAPOLEON WAS DEFENDING. HE MAY HAVE GOT CARRIED AWAY WITH HIMSELF, LATER BECOMING EMPEROR, BUT HE WAS NO HITLER.

THAT IS A VERY BIASED SUMMARY YOU COMMIE!

 

[fibonelli]

Putting on my serious hat:

Wars seem to start during troubled economic times where the emotions of fear, anger and mistrust are at their greatest.

WWIII will probably start to kick start the world economy after the anticipated deflationary (hyperinflationary?) chaos. WWII enabled the world economy to recover from the 1930s depression. War is a racket.

Triggers would be resource wars - oil/gas/minerals/food/water. Locations - Practically anywhere, though unlikely in Australasia.

***************************************
I'd like a war to send the N. London imposters back to Woolwich (a footie war!). COYS :clap:

 

[zigglewigler]

THAT IS A VERY BIASED SUMMARY YOU COMMIE!

INTACT, YOU COULD SAY THAT THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO NAPOLEON, IF THE BRITISH HAD JUST MINDED THEIR OWN BUSINESS, IF THEY HAD JUST BROWN NOSED THEIR ROYAL FAMILY AND LANDED GENTRY.

AND BEFORE ANYONE SAYS 'OH YEAH, BUT WHAT ABOUT WATERLOO', HERE'S THE TRUTH. THE BRITISH ON THEIR OWN WOULD HAVE BEEN WIPED OFF OF NAPOLEON'S BOOTS AT WATERLOO, THE BRITS ONLY MADE UP 20% OF THE OPPOSING ARMY, THE FRENCH WOULD HAVE WON IT, IF a) THE PRUSSIANS HADN'T ARRIVED AT THE LAST MINUTE WITH ANOTHER 55,000 TROOPS, ADDING TO AN ALREADY LARGER ARMY THAN THE FRENCH AND b) IF NAPOLEON HADN'T BEEN SUFFERING FROM HORRENDOUS PILES THAT DAY. THE WINTER OF 1812 IN RUSSIA WAS THE BEGINNING OF THE END FOR THE FRENCH. WELLINGTON WAS BORN IN DUBLIN, HENCE A FLUKEY IRISHMAN.:clover:

PUT THAT IN YOUR PEEPS, YOU ROSBIFS. VIVRE LA COMMUNE!!!!:cheesy:

 

[arabianights]

INTACT, YOU COULD SAY THAT THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO NAPOLEON, IF THE BRITISH HAD JUST MINDED THEIR OWN BUSINESS, IF THEY HAD JUST BROWN NOSED THEIR ROYAL FAMILY AND LANDED GENTRY.

AND BEFORE ANYONE SAYS 'OH YEAH, BUT WHAT ABOUT WATERLOO', HERE'S THE TRUTH. THE BRITISH ON THEIR OWN WOULD HAVE BEEN WIPED OFF OF NAPOLEON'S BOOTS AT WATERLOO, THE BRITS ONLY MADE UP 20% OF THE OPPOSING ARMY, THE FRENCH WOULD HAVE WON IT, IF a) THE PRUSSIANS HADN'T ARRIVED AT THE LAST MINUTE WITH ANOTHER 55,000 TROOPS, ADDING TO AN ALREADY LARGER ARMY THAN THE FRENCH AND b) IF NAPOLEON HADN'T BEEN SUFFERING FROM HORRENDOUS PILES THAT DAY. THE WINTER OF 1812 IN RUSSIA WAS THE BEGINNING OF THE END FOR THE FRENCH. WELLINGTON WAS BORN IN DUBLIN, HENCE A FLUKEY IRISHMAN.:clover:

PUT THAT IN YOUR PEEPS, YOU ROSBIFS. VIVRE LA COMMUNE!!!!:cheesy:

JE NE COMPREND AUCUNE DE CELA VOUS COMMUNISTE!!!!!!!!

 

[zigglewigler]

JE NE COMPREND AUCUNE DE CELA VOUS COMMUNISTE!!!!!!!!

THIS WILL AMUSE YOU.
IT'S MY FAVOURITE BIT OF HISTORY THAT YOU NEVER LEARN ABOUT AT SCHOOL.
IT HIGHLIGHTS, HOW SHALL I PUT IT, THE BRITS CRONICK INSECURITY.
I FOUND IT SOME YEARS AGO IN A PORN MAG, WHICH PROVES JUST HOW GOOD THEIR ARTICLES ARE!:innocent:

 

[Crap Buddist]

The people V Their own governments ? maybe that will kick off , 30,000 plod being armed with tazers now in the UK, that cant be for peace purposes can it ? And what about Westminster being abolished 5th May 2010 and the EU constitution taking hold? Maybe its about martial law of the people next war ?

Hope not, but I see twats all the time n everywhere !

 

[Crap Buddist]

Yeah so do I !

 

[rathcoole_exile]

INTACT, YOU COULD SAY THAT THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO NAPOLEON, IF THE BRITISH HAD JUST MINDED THEIR OWN BUSINESS, IF THEY HAD JUST BROWN NOSED THEIR ROYAL FAMILY AND LANDED GENTRY.

AND BEFORE ANYONE SAYS 'OH YEAH, BUT WHAT ABOUT WATERLOO', HERE'S THE TRUTH. THE BRITISH ON THEIR OWN WOULD HAVE BEEN WIPED OFF OF NAPOLEON'S BOOTS AT WATERLOO, THE BRITS ONLY MADE UP 20% OF THE OPPOSING ARMY, THE FRENCH WOULD HAVE WON IT, IF a) THE PRUSSIANS HADN'T ARRIVED AT THE LAST MINUTE WITH ANOTHER 55,000 TROOPS, ADDING TO AN ALREADY LARGER ARMY THAN THE FRENCH AND b) IF NAPOLEON HADN'T BEEN SUFFERING FROM HORRENDOUS PILES THAT DAY. THE WINTER OF 1812 IN RUSSIA WAS THE BEGINNING OF THE END FOR THE FRENCH. WELLINGTON WAS BORN IN DUBLIN, HENCE A FLUKEY IRISHMAN.:clover:

PUT THAT IN YOUR PEEPS, YOU ROSBIFS. VIVRE LA COMMUNE!!!!:cheesy:

nobody is disputing the contribution made by the Prussians BUT they were only successful because Wellington held the field for so long, taking tremendous casualties, confident and trusting that Blucher's forces would arrive in time to save the situation. (despite Gneisenau's reluctance to join battle)
And the Prussians only made the effort to join the fray, confident that Wellington would have prevented Napoleon springing a trap on them (the Prussians)
ironically, it was probably the lateness of the Prussian's arrival that enabled the Allies to win - had Blucher arrived earlier, Napoleon may well have had time to withdraw his forces and live to fight another day. As it was, his forces were too involved to be extricated swiftly or efficiently