Isiris Horse Racing System

Salty Gibbon said:
Has anybody put together their own horse racing system ?
Depends a little what you mean by "system". That's to say: not really, but I have my own particular way of putting together information from others' "selections" which I've been developing over the years with limited success.

Salty Gibbon said:
Much more difficult than day-trading.
Yes, I think I probably agree with that. But I was slightly lucky with daytrading, I think. I had probably done a little bit less real work on it than "the average eventually successful trader" does before finding, learning and applying something that genuinely worked.

Salty Gibbon said:
I thought about laying horses but it seems that one winning horse can lose what you made on your last 10 winning losers, or am I wrong ?
You're right if you don't have a "ceiling price", yes. Some people don't lay at odds above 7/1 or 5/1 or even 7/2, which obviously limits the number of winners effectively wiped out by a loss. But losers (i.e. winners) seem disproportionately expensive, yes.

There are various different "staking systems" for laying, though. You don't have to "lay to £x" each time.

From my experience, the major problem with laying is that it's even more important than usual to try to do better than starting-price. The difference that this makes over a period of time is almost inevitably the difference between overall loss and overall profit, which makes it more time-consuming and attention-needing than other forms of horse-race betting.
 
Well, if Charles is out of the running (arf!) I guess I'd go for Camilla. At least she's alive...in a strange sort of way...

Back to your earlier post, and quite by chance, I was chatting with a publican yesterday. A well-known trainer (presumably well-known if you're into the horse racing scene) frequents his pub and has given them recently 4-out-of-4 winners. Of course, said publican didn't mention if the trainer had given any losers previously...

But more interestingly, he said how the trainer (and presumably all trainers) regularly 'pull' the horse from a race if conditions aren't perfect for it or if the opposition looks a little too stiff or whatever. This tactic is apparently above board - they simply lose their race fee for that race. But it has some profound effect on subsequent weight rating...

He also (the trainer not the publican) suggested looking at nags that have had a place followed by 2 no place showings...

I have no intention (at the moment) of doing any research in the Sport of Kings as I feel it's even more bent than a Manifesto of Politicians or a Planter of Police, but for those of you who do have a more avid interest, this information may be of use.
 
TheBramble said:
he said how the trainer (and presumably all trainers) regularly 'pull' the horse from a race if conditions aren't perfect for it or if the opposition looks a little too stiff or whatever. This tactic is apparently above board - they simply lose their race fee for that race. But it has some profound effect on subsequent weight rating.
Absolutely. Very widespread indeed. The usual reason for this is that they were actually planning to win the race but something looks questionable (i.e. sudden change in the going) after connections have lumped on. Better to forfeit the entry-fee than all their bets struck on the day, if something's "not quite right".

TheBramble said:
He also (the trainer not the publican) suggested looking at nags that have had a place followed by 2 no place showings.
That would be for horses running in handicaps, then, presumably? I can just about see the logic ...
 
Roberto said:
That would be for horses running in handicaps, then, presumably? I can just about see the logic ...
Yes sorry. Just for handicaps. Apparently the weight gets adjusted downward for each no place showing...
 
I noticed that Camilla was carrying less weight last Saturday.

Was it because of the handicapping system do you think ?
 
Roberto said:
Absolutely. Very widespread indeed. The usual reason for this is that they were actually planning to win the race but something looks questionable (i.e. sudden change in the going) after connections have lumped on. Better to forfeit the entry-fee than all their bets struck on the day, if something's "not quite right".

That would be for horses running in handicaps, then, presumably? I can just about see the logic ...

Roberto,
You still with Kevin this year? I moved to Henry Rix - going very well.
Andy
 
andytoogood said:
Roberto, You still with Kevin this year? I moved to Henry Rix - going very well.
Still with Kevin, yes. Less dependent on him than in previous years, but no complaints at all.

Good luck with Henry Rix ... sounds good so far. I know he can have some very good runs (if you'll excuse the phrase) but his _overall_ performance as independently monitored by people like Racing Information Database is really pretty poor, you know?

I always "go easy" a bit in April until some form has settled down, and I am to make 75% of my year's takings between May 1st and September 30th.
 
Roberto said:
Still with Kevin, yes. Less dependent on him than in previous years, but no complaints at all.

Good luck with Henry Rix ... sounds good so far. I know he can have some very good runs (if you'll excuse the phrase) but his _overall_ performance as independently monitored by people like Racing Information Database is really pretty poor, you know?

I always "go easy" a bit in April until some form has settled down, and I am to make 75% of my year's takings between May 1st and September 30th.

Glad to hear it. Who else do you use then?
 
Got a circular in the post this morning from a guy called Colin Davey, advertising his tipping service.

Anybody heard of him ?
 
Trader333 said:
Yes, bin it
Succinct, fair, and entirely correct. Paul is putting it very mildly indeed. Don't even think about doing anything else!
 
I actually found a critique of him on the internet and have already binned it.

So, is there such a thing as a really good value for money tipster ?

Henry Rix sounds good if you listen to Andy but you don't seem to think he's particularly good , Roberto.
 
Salty Gibbon said:
So, is there such a thing as a really good value for money tipster ?
Is there any reason to suppose someone 'gifted' in the prediction of Horse Racing results is more likely to be 'a good bet' than one who claims to be able to offer a similar facility in the matter of Trading the Financial Markets?

For the same reason we (generally) suspect anyone claiming to offer a sure-fire trading system and why they're not just trading it rather than selling it; why would it be any different to a racing tipster?

If you could predict the winner of the next 5 races at Kempton - would you sell the information or would you use it?
 
If you could predict the winner of the next 5 races at Kempton - would you sell the information or would you use it?

If I could do that, I would not be sitting here wasting my time churning out bull's manure.
 
Salty Gibbon said:
So, is there such a thing as a really good value for money tipster ?
Yes, Salty. There are tipsters whose tips have been making steady level-stake profits for years with almost never a losing month, all independently monitored and corroborated. It's as with "trading tipsters" in that 99% of the claims they make are untrue, and 99% of services lose money. The difference is that the mechanisms whereby they are independently monitored and corroborated are much better established in the case of horse-race tipsters than they are with trading services. The fx-review website and forum have the right idea, but they are very new and (with all respect to David, its proprietor) therefore still have some way to go before firmly establishing their credibility.

Salty Gibbon said:
Henry Rix sounds good if you listen to Andy but you don't seem to think he's particularly good , Roberto.
I happily concede that he may be having a tremendous run at the moment. There are so many tipsters (although not exactly hundreds as established as Henry Rix, I admit) that at any one time there are _always_ a handful having a tremendous run. I'm not so impressed by Henry Rix's long-term record, myself.

I used to get a lot of information from a friend from university who works for one of the newspapers as a racing writer, and this friend spends at least 20 minutes a day on the phone to Henry Rix every day (usually very early in the morning) and I was given a lot of "Henry's best private tips" over a 2-year period, and I did not find them profitable, myself. It's like so many other things we discuss on these boards: everyone has their own experience, and there are nearly as many opinions as punters, perhaps.

TheBramble said:
Is there any reason to suppose someone 'gifted' in the prediction of Horse Racing results is more likely to be 'a good bet' than one who claims to be able to offer a similar facility in the matter of Trading the Financial Markets?
No, there's no good reason for supposing that, Tony. But the reality is that it's a bit easier to find out if you know how to do it and if you're willing to put in the effort and spend the money - and it's not at all a cheap thing to do! The requisite information from ultra-reliable resources is pretty expensive and not readily shared.

TheBramble said:
For the same reason we (generally) suspect anyone claiming to offer a sure-fire trading system and why they're not just trading it rather than selling it; why would it be any different to a racing tipster? If you could predict the winner of the next 5 races at Kempton - would you sell the information or would you use it?
I would sell it for sure. I'd also use it as much as I could, but that would be a pretty limited source of income.

Here's the point: one of the key differences between racing tips and trading tips (and especially Forex tips) relates to the impact that the widespread use of the information has on the underlying market. I'll try to explain a little more ...

I've spoken admiringly on these boards before of a service called Isiris run by a chap called Kevin Booth, and I'm still a subscriber to that service myself. The way they operate is that when they have a really strong tip, they give subscribers a time to call back (usually either 2 or 3 minutes before the race in question) so that the information can't be circulated much, can't be sold on to other people, and therefore can't affect the odds much. They want their own small number of paying clients to get the information (for about £2,500 a year, if memory serves) and to profit from it (which we certainly do) but they don't want everyone to have it, because that would stop it from being profitable.

The same is not true of "information" about the EUR/USD because the size of the market is so different. So Epiphany Trade (whose tips are every bit as profitable as those of Isiris) probably don't mind so much if their subscribers circulate the trading information a bit, illicitly of course, on the quiet.

(And with "share tips", the more widely they're circulated, the better, I think?)

Regarding horse-racing, I know of two other services which are as reliable and consistent and profitable as Isiris (and actually nowhere near as expensive, although not exactly cheap either) but I'm not giving their names and contact details on a public board like this, because it took me a huge amount of effort (and expense) to discover who they are and to subscribe to their services! But if you're asking "Is there such a thing as a really reliable long-term tipster?", I promise you the answer is "yes".
 
Roberto said:
[...] the reality is that it's a bit easier to find out if you know how to do it and if you're willing to put in the effort and spend the money - and it's not at all a cheap thing to do! The requisite information from ultra-reliable resources is pretty expensive and not readily shared.
I read that several times and it still hasn't gone in.

'Requisite information' - on whether a horse will win a race or not? Excepting pull-ups and the like, only the bloody horse knows that - and then, probably not before the last furlong...

Have you ever set off for a run and against all expectations (a) felt so damned good you've run faster /further than you planned (b) been so inexplicably s!hite/tired/bored that you've stopped after 5 minutes? Do you think Horses might feel like that too...

I appreciate a trainer will be closer than most to the current 'probabilities', but even then...

To pay money to someone who isn't even that close...

Roberto said:
I would sell it for sure. I'd also use it as much as I could, but that would be a pretty limited source of income.
Why limited? If you had a bunch of certs - every day...


Roberto said:
[...] Here's the point: one of the key differences between racing tips and trading tips (and especially Forex tips) relates to the impact that the widespread use of the information has on the underlying market. I'll try to explain a little more ...
No! It's very similar - if not exactly the same.

The more money that goes on a nag - the shorter the price.

The more buying interest in a stock - the higher the price.

FX - you're kidding. Unless the 'interest' is phenomenally large....no chance.

Studied manipulation is called for in both cases.
 
TheBramble said:
I read that several times and it still hasn't gone in. 'Requisite information' - on whether a horse will win a race or not?
Sorry, Tony ... I had no idea I was being so opaque!! I meant the "requisite information" to determine reliably which tipster is honest, decent, truthful and consistently profitable! :)

TheBramble said:
Have you ever set off for a run and ...
No. I like to lie down until that desire passes ...

TheBramble said:
The more money that goes on a nag - the shorter the price. The more buying interest in a stock - the higher the price.
Yes ... it's rather the opposite, isn't it? The share tipster wants his subscribers to buy the shares he's already bought ... "pump and dump"? More people buying = higher prices = more profits for people who buy. The racing tipster wants to sell the information to as many people as he can without the fact that he's selling it having _too_ adverse an effect on the price available. More people betting = _lower_ prices = smaller profits for people who buy. Opposite effect.

The tipster can't make that much using the information himself. He can do much better selling it. He has been barred by all the bookies, for sure. Hell, even _I_ have been barred by a bookie or three in my time. That really doesn't take much! They know they will lose to you pretty consistently if you are a shrewd punter and they can live without you. (Thank God for the betting exchanges).

TheBramble said:
FX - you're kidding. Unless the 'interest' is phenomenally large....no chance.
Exactly my point.
 
Considering the fact that 99% of tipsters are diabolically bad at making selections which win in the long run, have any of you considered paying for their information and LAYING their selections on the Exchanges? I do that for handsome profit from the Derek Thompson tipping service!

However, I have also read about the following tipsters who recommend losers to be laid on the exchanges. Have any of you tried them and are they any good?

1. Isiris Losers Line
2. Racing-spread.com

If you have, can you also let me know over how long a period they've been making a profit/loss. I tried the Isiris losers at Aintree - but both came in! They assure me that 90% of their selections, which are favourites or second favourites do not win, but I want to know to what extent that is true.

Phil
 
Top