Thanks Iraj.
Hi
My daily MACCI reading of indu at close was -78. I guess tha one of us is getting an incorrect reading!
Maybe someone else could share their reading?
Steve
Hi Steve-mine shows -80.785. If I remember correctly, G1 had said ( & I feel the same)that it is not absolutely necesssary for the turn to take place at any specific value..so lets see what happens on Monday....
Raj
Steve/Raj,
For the record I am enclosing a copy of my TS8 chart. Mine says -77.64!
Cheers,
Imran
Attachments
Last edited:
Hi Imran,
I see that you have TS8 many others here have ts2000i that run ELS codes.. I am having a problem with the some codes posted here. Grey1 and paul have given me some codes that work but ohters I get errors and no displays.
I have to figure out how to use the global variiable 2.2 if you have the code for macci in charting and in radarscreen would you be so kind to share it with me. i can run ELD codes in TS 8.3. still having problems learn everything.
thanks
thanks for posting the chart Imran, it made me realise i have a bar or two missing from Thurs & Friday on my chart
cheers
Glen
moreagr, I'm sorry I havent started using the radarscreen with Iraj's stuff and I dont use the global variable dll so cant help you on that. However I had a quick search and came up with the following topics on the TS site:
https://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=4235
https://www.tradestation.com/discussions/Topic.aspx?TOPIC_ID=16825
(the second link is specific to V2)
Regards,
Imran
https://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=4235
https://www.tradestation.com/discussions/Topic.aspx?TOPIC_ID=16825
(the second link is specific to V2)
Regards,
Imran
Ultramarine
Junior member
- Messages
- 41
- Likes
- 4
Could some kind soul help me out in pinning down the MACCI? I don't use Tradestation but my guess from looking at the indicator legend in Imran's post that it's referring to a 5 period adaptive/exponential ma of the 6 period CCI. From my trawls through the TT threads I believed that sometime ago the question was asked as to the "correct" parameter values to use - 20,6 or 6,5 and I thought the answer came back 20,6 but I may have been mistaken and would have to start the search again in order to confirm. When communicating with Iraj I also thought that 20,6 got his blessing. Now confusion returns to my already fuddled brain. Either way, my calculated values differ significantly from the two values posted previously - but I can tackle that problem later!
Any views would be much appreciated.
Al
Any views would be much appreciated.
Al
what charting software are you using?? If you have qoutetracker i can help you out its very easy.
Ultramarine
Junior member
- Messages
- 41
- Likes
- 4
Paul,
Thanks for the clarification - nice to be sure I'm in tune with everybody else.
Moreagr,
I use Neoticker but nevertheless the offer is appreciated - thanks. It should be fairly simple to sort out but I need to look again as to why I'm getting a different result even with the 6,5 setting.
Probably best if I move to a new thread if I have to pursue this as I don't want to deflect from the main thrust of this thread.
Al
Thanks for the clarification - nice to be sure I'm in tune with everybody else.
Moreagr,
I use Neoticker but nevertheless the offer is appreciated - thanks. It should be fairly simple to sort out but I need to look again as to why I'm getting a different result even with the 6,5 setting.
Probably best if I move to a new thread if I have to pursue this as I don't want to deflect from the main thrust of this thread.
Al
Al, The MACCI may produce a slightly different result from whatever you depending on what type of MA has been used in the MACCI to do the smoothing on the CCI. Try different MA's on your Neoticker.
Regards,
Imran
Ultramarine
Junior member
- Messages
- 41
- Likes
- 4
Yes, Imran, I know there are quite a number of different versions of the ema and also that the stabilisation of the ema depends on the number of data points that are included in the series. I feel that my values are too far away from the examples posted earlier for either of these possibilities to be the cause but I'll have to look into it tomorrow to be certain.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Al
Al, I used the CCI (found in Tradestation) of length 6, smoothed it with a simple moving average of length 5 and I get the same value as MACCI as you can see from the enclosed picture.
Regards,
Imran
Attachments
ok, havn't have an answer from G1 on the other thread yet about going long, in this, as he see it, a bear market,
so i'll plod on,
the daily chart INDU look like its cycleing north, has been O/S
attached is charts of stocks from the strong list that O/S ish on the MACCI day charts (on a simlar cycle to the INDU)
will be looking for strength in these stocks tomorrow, then open longs at around close, and leave open till Wed if target not hit
so i'll plod on,
the daily chart INDU look like its cycleing north, has been O/S
attached is charts of stocks from the strong list that O/S ish on the MACCI day charts (on a simlar cycle to the INDU)
will be looking for strength in these stocks tomorrow, then open longs at around close, and leave open till Wed if target not hit
Grey1
Senior member
- Messages
- 2,190
- Likes
- 202
Sorry just saw this post.. MACCI daily WAS heading up on THURSDAY but now is flattening which basically means bears are still in control. It is very bearish if MACCI flattens and heads down from OS levels. IN another word even TECHNICAL catalysts are not stong enough to take the market up.. I am bear LONG term and feel traders MUST BE SHORT of stocks in their swing portfolio SELL IN TO ANY RALLIES ....
Grey1
