UK Politics

Screenshot from 2026-08-02 19-41-34.png

It is thought Al-Saqar had been able to claim asylum in Ireland by taking advantage of a short-lived immigration scheme which allowed Jordanians to travel to the UK after simply buying an online travel authorisation visa for £10.

This allowed him to travel to Northern Ireland and, from there, it was an easy matter to slip across the border to Dublin where, in June 2024, he claimed asylum.

Fact Check - source: Perplexity

The claim is broadly accurate in outline but imprecise on a few details.

What the UK’s ETA scheme for Jordanians was​

  • From 22 February 2024, Jordanian nationals (along with several Gulf states) could travel to the UK under the Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) scheme.
  • The ETA cost £10, was valid for multiple visits over two years, and could be obtained via an online app/website.gov+3
  • The scheme was not “short‑lived” in the sense of lasting only weeks: it ran from late February 2024 until 10 September 2024, when the UK announced it was ending ETA eligibility for Jordanians and reinstating a full visa requirement (with a short transition period until 8 October 2024).standard.co+3
So: yes, there was a period in 2024 when Jordanians could enter the UK after buying a £10 online authorisation; it lasted roughly seven months, not just a few weeks.

How this linked to asylum claims in Ireland​

Multiple Irish and UK sources explicitly link the ETA to a sharp rise in Jordanian asylum applications in Ireland in 2024:
  • Irish officials stated: “The UK’s new ETA is believed to be the link with the rise in applications of Jordanian nationals in Ireland in 2024.”rte
  • By 13 October 2024, there were 2,083 Jordanians claiming asylum in Ireland, up from very low numbers the previous year.rte+1
  • The UK government said removing Jordan from the ETA would “support the integrity and effective functioning of the Common Travel Area” (CTA), acknowledging the UK–Ireland migration route via Northern Ireland.rte
The ETA rules themselves noted that an ETA was required for people crossing the land border into Northern Ireland, and that the authorisation covered journeys across the Ireland–Northern Ireland border while it was valid.homeofficemedia.blog

Al‑Saqar’s specific route and asylum claim​

Reporting on Ahmad Al‑Saqar (the suspect in the killing of Jamey Carney in Kerry) consistently says:
  • He came to Ireland in 2024, having travelled first to Northern Ireland, then made his way to Dublin.irishtimes+1
  • In June 2024, he applied for asylum in Dublin (International Protection Office on Mount Street).headtopics+1
  • His asylum application was later refused; he was appealing that refusal at the time of the murder in July 2026.joe+2
Irish officials and media have tied his case to the wider pattern of Jordanians using the UK ETA to reach the island of Ireland and then claim asylum, though most reports do not spell out his exact ETA purchase or landing port.rte+2

What is confirmed vs inferred​

Well supported:
  • There was a 2024 window where Jordanians could enter the UK (including via Northern Ireland) with just a £10 online ETA.gov+2
  • Al‑Saqar arrived in Ireland in 2024, via Northern Ireland, and claimed asylum in Dublin in June 2024.irishtimes+2
  • Irish officials explicitly link the surge in Jordanian asylum claims to the UK ETA scheme.rte
Less explicitly documented in public sources:
  • The exact statement that he “took advantage of a short‑lived immigration scheme” is directionally right about the ETA, but the scheme lasted months, not a brief blip.standard.co+2
  • Most reports say he travelled to Northern Ireland then on to Dublin, but do not always detail the specific “slip across the border” mechanics; that phrasing is a journalistic summary of the well‑known porous land border in the CTA.irishtimes+1

Bottom line​

  • The core factual claim—that Al‑Saqar reached Ireland in 2024 by exploiting the UK’s £10 online ETA for Jordanians, entering via Northern Ireland and then claiming asylum in Dublin in June 2024—is consistent with multiple independent reports and official statements.rte+3
  • The only real overstatement is calling the ETA a “short‑lived” scheme; it operated for about seven months before being closed to Jordanians due to misuse concerns.
 
Screenshot from 2026-08-04 17-18-41.png
A mother who let her daughter be murdered by her evil boyfriend will be back on the streets within a year - after serving just one third of her sentence.

Dana Carr, 27, is set to be free by Christmas after being jailed in December 2023 for allowing the death of two-year-old Maya Chappell, who was shaken to death by Carr's boyfriend Michael Daymond.

Maya's father, James Chappell, had sought to intervene to save the youngster, but Carr deliberately turned a blind eye to her boyfriend's sickening pattern of abuse.

The toddler's family had called on the Prime Minister to review the early release scheme - but have since learned that Carr will be allowed free earlier than planned thanks to Labour.

Around 1,000 criminals including rapists and paedophiles have been exempted from the early release scheme and will serve their sentences as planned, following an outcry.

But some killers, such as two men convicted of the manslaughter of PC Andrew Harper, remain eligible for release despite the law changing to make life sentences mandatory for people who kill emergency service workers.
 
SLIDE 1: THE HIDDEN UNDER BELLY AND TIP OF THE ICE BERG OF A BROKEN JUSTICE & PENAL SYSTEM.
SL_1.png
 
Last edited:
SLIDE 2: THE HIDDEN UNDER BELLY AND TIP OF THE ICE BERG OF A BROKEN JUSTICE & PENAL SYSTEM.
SL_2.png
 
Last edited:
SLIDE 3: THE HIDDEN UNDER BELLY AND TIP OF THE ICE BERG OF A BROKEN JUSTICE & PENAL SYSTEM.
SL_3.png
 
Last edited:
SLIDE 4: THE HIDDEN UNDER BELLY AND TIP OF THE ICE BERG OF A BROKEN JUSTICE & PENAL SYSTEM.
SL_4.png
 
SLIDE 5: THE HIDDEN UNDER BELLY AND TIP OF THE ICE BERG OF A BROKEN JUSTICE & PENAL SYSTEM.
SL_5.png
 
SLIDE 6: THE HIDDEN UNDER BELLY AND TIP OF THE ICE BERG OF A BROKEN JUSTICE & PENAL SYSTEM.
SL_6.png
 
SLIDE 7: THE HIDDEN UNDER BELLY AND TIP OF THE ICE BERG OF A BROKEN JUSTICE & PENAL SYSTEM.
SL_7.png
 
SLIDE 8: THE HIDDEN UNDER BELLY AND TIP OF THE ICE BERG OF A BROKEN JUSTICE & PENAL SYSTEM.
Screenshot from 2026-08-07 17-08-44.png
 
Screenshot from 2026-08-07 17-30-40.png

source: Perplexity

Zacariah Boulares is a British citizen, not an illegal migrant or an Algerian national with a visa.thetimes+1

Nationality and citizenship​

  • He was born at the Royal Free Hospital in Hampstead, north London, in February 2007, which makes him a British citizen by birth.thetimes+1
  • Multiple reports initially described him as “Algerian” because of his father’s origin, but later corrections clarified that he is actually a British citizen born in the UK.
 
Cambridge professor at centre of plagiarism row resigns
View attachment 348503

The More You Look, the Worse it Gets!
THE MORE YOU LOOK, THE WORSE IT GETS !
Screenshot from 2026-08-07 17-33-11.png

Screenshot from 2026-08-07 17-56-28.png


Prof Jason Arday described two alleged confrontations at his Cambridge faculty by a masked man, the second involving a knife and threats to harm him unless he resigned. He said he did not report either incident at the time, and neither was captured on CCTV or witnessed by colleagues. [theguardian](https://www.theguardian.com/education/ng-interactive/2026/aug/01/playbooks-plagiarism-pigs-head-new-claims-surrounding-cambridge-professor-jason-arday)

He also said a severed pig’s head had been delivered to his parents’ South London home and that police later traced it to a butcher. The Metropolitan Police said this account was “categorically” incorrect: it found no record of such an investigation or officers visiting the named butcher. A police-record search likewise found no matching report for the alleged threats. [theguardian](https://www.theguardian.com/education/ng-interactive/2026/aug/01/playbooks-plagiarism-pigs-head-new-claims-surrounding-cambridge-professor-jason-arday)
source: Perplexity

BUT 👇 a Times Higher Education journalist inquiry was reported to the police - and (no surprises here) the police spent four months of police resources investigating the journalist.

However, soon after, academics raised concerns with him and his bosses about plagiarism regarding his past work.

When Times Higher Education magazine began investigating the academic's record, Professor Arday made a complaint to the police, resulting in officers calling the journalist involved.

On Thursday, Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police commissioner, admitted the force 'dropped the ball' when it spent four months investigating the journalist.
source: Daily Mail and general news
 
Last edited:
(Filmed on 2&3 August 2026) Ceuta, a Spanish territory located on the North African coast, has become the epicenter of one of the most intense border crises in modern European history. Following recent mass border crossings, thousands of migrants entered the enclave, overwhelming local infrastructure and prompting major international news coverage.

While mainstream reports claim the majority of people have been returned across the border, what is the actual situation on the ground right now? I traveled to Ceuta to see the reality with my own eyes and document what is happening away from the official press releases.

In this video, I walk directly to the beaches and border zones to speak with the people who made the journey. Why did they decide to cross, where are they planning to go next, and how was this massive event coordinated? From makeshift camps on the coast to the heavy security presence, this is an unfiltered, ground-level investigation into the frontlines of Europe's border debate.

https://www.dailymail.com/news/arti...ham-claim-migrants-invaded-left-SUE-REID.html

News : 8 August 2026
Screenshot from 2026-08-08 07-15-54.png
 
Screenshot from 2026-08-08 08-08-03.png

Almost one in five student loans are being handed to foreign nationals, sparking fears British taxpayers could be left footing a multi-billion-pound bill for unpaid debt.

New figures show non-British citizens received around £4billion in tuition fee and maintenance loans in the last academic year, accounting for nearly 20 per cent of all lending under the student finance system.

The vast majority went to EU nationals who qualify under post-Brexit residency arrangements, with Romanians alone accounting for around one in every 20 first-time loans.

Critics have warned that the growing number of loans issued to non-British citizens could leave taxpayers exposed, with overseas borrowers estimated to be around a quarter less likely to repay their debts than British graduates.

Figures show the Treasury could be forced to write off between £1.2billion and £2.2billion a year as a result.

Under current rules, most international students are not eligible for UK student loans and are expected to fund their own tuition fees and living costs. However, exemptions exist for EU citizens and their relatives who secured rights under the post-Brexit settlement scheme.

Official figures show that of the 239,000 foreign nationals currently receiving student loans, around 195,000 have settled status.

Figures compiled by Conservative MP Neil O'Brien show the number of student loans going to non-UK citizens has almost doubled over the past decade, rising from 10.2 per cent to 19.3 per cent.

Fact Check - source: ClhatGPT
Yes. I’ve treated “foreign” as non-UK nationality, including EU nationals, rather than using “international student” as a synonym. The important distinction is that the official loan-stock statistics are generally reported by domicile, while the newer £4bn figure is based on declared nationality.

Bottom line​

The claim contains a real and substantial underlying fact, but it mixes several different measures and makes some claims much stronger than the evidence supports.
The most important number for your question is:
  • EU borrowers owed £5.8bn in outstanding UK student loans at 31 March 2025.
  • By 31 March 2026, that had risen to £6.0bn.
  • The entire English higher-education student-loan book was £266.6bn in March 2025 and £294.6bn in March 2026.
  • So EU borrowers account for roughly 2.0–2.2% of the outstanding HE loan book, not anything close to 20%. (Parliament Questions and Statements)
Comment - Phylo: Perplexity and Claude confirm the highlighted above.

Using the latest 2025–26 figures:
Screenshot from 2026-08-08 08-43-07.png

So, on the official domicile-based figures, EU borrowers owe about £6bn versus roughly £289bn owed by everyone else in the English HE loan book.
But there is an important caveat: £289bn is not literally “British citizens' debt”. The government's £294.6bn figure is an England/EU domicile measure, not a nationality breakdown. So it is not legitimate to label the whole £288.6bn as “UK citizens' debt”. (GOV.UK)

The really interesting number: repayment​

The government was specifically asked in Parliament how much EU students owe.
Its answer was:
£5.8bn outstanding at 31 March 2025.
And among EU borrowers who were liable to repay, only 38.8% were actively repaying, had fully repaid, or had their loan cancelled/written off. (Parliament Questions and Statements)
That is a much more defensible fact than the claim that billions are definitely going to be lost.

Fact-check of the text​

1. “Almost one in five student loans are being handed to foreign nationals”​

Broadly TRUE, but misleadingly worded.
The latest figures obtained by Neil O'Brien show non-UK nationals received approximately £4bn of student-finance lending, representing about 19.3% of lending.

The government separately confirmed that £3.794bn was paid in 2024–25 in fee and maintenance loans to undergraduate students who declared themselves non-UK nationals. (Parallel Parliament)
However, this is money lent during a year, not the proportion of the total outstanding student debt.
That's a crucial distinction:
~19.3% of new lending ≠ 19.3% of outstanding debt.
The outstanding EU balance is only about 2% of the total HE loan book. (GOV.UK)

2. “Foreign nationals received around £4bn”​

TRUE, approximately.
The government figure is £3.794bn for 2024–25. The press reports round that to £4bn. (Parallel Parliament)
And this isn't £4bn handed to random foreign students who arrived from overseas to study.
That's one of the biggest problems with the wording.

3. “The vast majority went to EU nationals”​

Apparently TRUE, but the article doesn't give enough detail to establish the exact proportion.
The overwhelming issue is that many of these are people who have UK residency rights, rather than conventional international students.
For example, the government says people with settled status can qualify for full student finance if they satisfy the residence requirements. (GOV.UK)
So calling the entire £4bn “foreign students” gives a rather different impression from the actual eligibility rules.

4. “Of the 239,000 foreign nationals currently receiving student loans, around 195,000 have settled status”​

The figures are reported, but I would treat them as a sourced political/FOI calculation rather than an independently published headline statistic from SLC.
The Times reports the figures as coming from Student Loans Company data: approximately 239,000 foreign citizens receiving loans, of whom about 195,000 have settled status. (The Times)
That means approximately:
195,000 / 239,000 = 81.6%
So if those figures are correct, roughly 82% of the foreign-national borrowers have settled status.
That's quite important because it demolishes the idea that this is predominantly ordinary overseas students arriving temporarily in Britain to exploit the system.

5. “Romanians alone accounting for around one in every 20 first-time loans”​

Reported as TRUE, subject to the underlying SLC data.
Neil O'Brien says Romanian nationals account for approximately 5% of new loans. The Times reports the same claim. (The Times)
There is also a striking longer-term figure:
Romanian borrowing has reportedly doubled to about £1.25bn. (The Times)
That is worth investigating separately because it is considerably more specific than the general “foreign students” statistic.

6. “Foreign borrowers are around a quarter less likely to repay”​

The underlying numbers are TRUE; the interpretation needs care.
The figures reported from parliamentary questions are:
  • 51% of non-UK nationals made a repayment
  • 68% of British nationals made a repayment
The relative difference is:
(68 − 51) / 68 = 25%
So saying non-UK nationals had a 25% lower repayment rate is mathematically fair. (The Times)
But this does not mean “25% of their loans won't be repaid”.
It means the proportion of borrowers making a repayment in that particular year was lower.
Those are very different things.

7. “The Treasury could be forced to write off £1.2bn–£2.2bn a year”​

NOT established fact.
This is an estimate/argument, not an official government forecast.
The government has not published an estimate saying it will definitely lose £1.2–£2.2bn annually because of foreign borrowers.
Neil O'Brien himself says the government doesn't publish the necessary repayment estimates for non-UK nationals and argues that losses could exceed £2bn. (The Times)
So I'd label this:
SPECULATIVE / POLITICAL ESTIMATE, NOT ESTABLISHED FACT.

8. “International students normally aren't eligible”​

TRUE.
But again, there's an important distinction.
Someone who comes to Britain from France, Germany, Romania etc. specifically to study will generally not qualify simply because they're an EU citizen.
New EU students without settled/pre-settled status lost access to tuition-fee funding from 2021/22. (GOV.UK)
There are exceptions for people protected by the Withdrawal Agreement/EU Settlement Scheme and other residency categories.

The £6bn figure is the one I'd use​

This is the strongest number available because it comes directly from the government's own published statistics.
The latest government figures now say:
EU student-loan balance: £6.0bn at 31 March 2026.
The entire English higher-education loan balance was £294.6bn. (GOV.UK)
So:
£6.0bn / £294.6bn = 2.04%
In other words:
EU borrowers account for about 2% of the outstanding English HE student-loan book.
Or roughly:
£1 of every £49 of outstanding HE student debt is owed by EU borrowers.
That's radically different from saying one in five of the UK's student debt is foreign.
It isn't.
The one-in-five figure relates to new lending, not the accumulated debt.

And there's another very interesting number​

The SLC has been trying to trace 121,000 overseas borrowers with approximately £3.4bn of outstanding loans.
Of these, approximately 42,000 EU-linked borrowers account for £893m of the debt being traced. (Funky Media Radio)
That does not mean £893m has been stolen or will never be repaid.
The SLC explicitly says borrowers being traced aren't necessarily defaulters: some may be unemployed, below the repayment threshold, studying, etc. (inkl)
But it does demonstrate a genuine enforcement problem.

So what is actually owed?​

Here's the cleanest way I'd present it:
As at 31 March 2026:
  • Total English HE student-loan balance: £294.6bn
  • EU borrower balance: £6.0bn
  • EU share: ~2.0%
  • Approximate non-EU/England-domiciled remainder: £288.6bn
  • EU debt is therefore approximately 1/48th of the total.
And as at March 2025:
  • EU balance: £5.8bn
  • Total HE balance: £266.6bn
  • EU share: ~2.18%. (GOV.UK)
So the claim that foreign nationals are getting a disproportionately large amount of new lending is supported by the data.
The claim that foreign/EU students constitute 20% of Britain's outstanding student debt is false.
And the claim that £1.2–£2.2bn is definitely being lost every year isn't established by the official data.

One particularly important correction to the framing​

You said:
“EU students are foreign students in that they are not UK citizens.”
As a matter of nationality, yes.
But that isn't necessarily the same thing as an international student in the UK student-finance system.
An EU national who has lived here for years and has settled status can qualify for student finance under the same basic system as a UK national, subject to the residency rules. The government's own eligibility rules explicitly recognise this. (GOV.UK)
So for a hard-numbers analysis I'd use three categories:
  1. UK nationals
  2. EU/non-UK nationals with UK residency rights
  3. Genuine overseas/international students without those rights
Those categories are much more informative than simply “British vs foreigners”.

My verdict on the whole passage​

The core story is real, but the presentation is materially sensationalised.
ClaimVerdict
~19% of new lending goes to non-UK nationals🟢 Supported
About £4bn lent to non-UK nationals🟢 Supported
Most are EU nationals🟢 Likely / supported by reported data
~239k foreign nationals receiving loans🟢 Reported SLC figure
~195k have settled status🟢 Reported figure
Romanians ~5% of new loans🟢 Reported/supported
Non-UK repayment rate 51% vs British 68%🟢 Supported
Foreign borrowers are “25% less likely” to make a repayment🟢 Mathematically correct
£1.2–£2.2bn annual taxpayer loss🟠 Estimate, not established fact
20% of outstanding debt is foreign🔴 False
EU borrowers owe ~£6bn🟢 Official government figure
EU debt is ~2% of HE loan book🟢 Official figures
£893m owed by EU-linked borrowers being traced🟢 Reported SLC figure, but not equivalent to £893m defaulted

The £6bn versus ~£289bn comparison is therefore the cleanest answer to the question you actually asked. (GOV.UK)
If you want, I can also dig into the country-by-country figures — Romania, Poland, Cyprus, Bulgaria etc. — and calculate how much each nationality currently owes, repayment rates, and the estimated amount at risk of never being recovered.
https://www.dailymail.com/news/arti...payers-multi-billion-pound-bill.html#comments
 
Last edited:
THE GIFT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING - WHEN WOKE D-E-I REPLACES MERITOCRACY
Screenshot from 2026-08-08 16-51-29.png

ADORATION THAT BACKFIRED !
We are so lucky to have you. You are the best in the world in terms of the research that you do - Professor Hilary Cremin, the Head of the Faculty of Education at the University of Cambridge. [1, 2, 3]

She originally made the statement in a promotional broadcast welcoming Jason Arday to the department after his historic appointment as Cambridge's youngest Black professor. The quote resurfaced in widespread media coverage following Arday's sudden resignation amid a major academic plagiarism and CV fabrication scandal. [, 2, 3]
  • 'Best in the worlds in terms of research that you do', under academic scrutiny is - devoid of DEI biased blindness - revealed to be a humiliating exposure and embarrassment of mediocrity and .... err....fraudulent plagiarism.
Screenshot from 2026-08-08 21-19-04.png

A growing tendency within academia placing emotional affirmation, identity-based DEI imperatives, and ideological conformity above open inquiry, rigorous academic scrutiny, and individual merit.

On campuses this is a growing shift toward "therapeutic" or "safelist" academic culture, where emotional comfort, identity-based representation, and inclusion goals are prioritised over rigorous debate, objective merit evaluation, and open inquiry - prioritising feelings over facts.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top