I know its just spam... and I know I should know better but...
Is it just me, or do other people get equally annoyed reading comments such as
"Murphy's Law dictates that the longer an intraday trade lingers in a never-never land between a profitable exit signal and the stop loss, then the more likely it is that the position will produce a loss"
Either this statement is true for a given set up, or it isnt, but either way, surely the author should be able to provide a more definative definition, i.e "research indicates that X% of all trades that linger in never never land for a period greater than Y produce an average loss of Z"
Discretionary traders have a love of trading, system traders have a love of money.
This article has been removed and was posted in error from archives. The article was not written by Joe Ross, rather a former staff member.
Is this you, or a paraphrase from somwhere else?
And as for 3 minutes?!... yeah yeah, whatever you say pal
Hmm so whats the standing with time stops? This popped into my head...
Trade what you see, not whats on your wristwatch, but whats going on in the market.
Yeah its 100% me Mr Gecko . I sat and thought about it ,as the question was asked in a thread here, I reached within for a definitive , so I could put it to bed, for myself I think.