Hi Jason,
I suspect that the reason you're not getting any replies is that the answer to your question hasn't changed since it was last asked - and the time before that and the time before that!
In a nutshell, no instrument is inherently easier to trade than any other. If such an instrument existed then, presumably, everyone would trade it. Only trading masochists are gonna say 'nah, it's way too easy to make money trading that, I want a real challenge - so I'm going trade XYZ'. Don't tell me, I've just walked straight into your trap and this is where you tell me there is indeed just such an instrument and everyone here on T2W knows about it and is making shed loads of wonga trading it - everyone except me that is!
This is not to be confused with personal preference which is another matter entirely. We all have markets and instruments that we like / don't like and many of us are more suited to trading one/some of them in preference to others. For example, I've always steered clear of forex, largely on the grounds that when we're sitting in a cafe in Spain and my wife asks me what our coffees cost in sterling - it takes me five minutes to work out the conversion from euros to pounds - and even then I'm prone to getting it wrong.
Tim.
Hi Jason,
I suspect that the reason you're not getting any replies is that the answer to your question hasn't changed since it was last asked - and the time before that and the time before that!
Dont hold back, say what you feel!
In a nutshell, no instrument is inherently easier to trade than any other. If such an instrument existed then, presumably, everyone would trade it. Only trading masochists are gonna say 'nah, it's way too easy to make money trading that, I want a real challenge - so I'm going trade XYZ'. Don't tell me, I've just walked straight into your trap and this is where you tell me there is indeed just such an instrument and everyone here on T2W knows about it and is making shed loads of wonga trading it - everyone except me that is!
I don't agree with you at all. It could be said that exotic FX is nasty due to wide spreads, lack of news and lack of liquidity. Do you really believe that exotic FX is as equally hard as a UK ETF Investment trust?
This is not to be confused with personal preference which is another matter entirely.
Yes you are spot on here, what I am after is a discussion on why you personally prefer trading a particular market.
We all have markets and instruments that we like / don't like and many of us are more suited to trading one/some of them in preference to others. For example, I've always steered clear of forex, largely on the grounds that when we're sitting in a cafe in Spain and my wife asks me what our coffees cost in sterling - it takes me five minutes to work out the conversion from euros to pounds - and even then I'm prone to getting it wrong.
Tim.
Is it just me who finds post #2 a little bizarre.......?
Which instrument do you think is the easiest to trade and which do you think are the hardest? An idea of your style/time frames may be helpful.
What are your reasons?
For what its worth, Most people ive spoken with find the ES the HARDEST to trade.
Quite a few traders I know have been having some joy trading oil for quite a while now.
Everything is pretty much the same to me though....
Good question Jason, I find I myself making more consistent money from UK equities. I trend follow on the daily charts. Mostly T/A with a quick look at the company fundamentals.
"I don't agree with you at all. It could be said that exotic FX is nasty due to wide spreads, lack of news and lack of liquidity. Do you really believe that exotic FX is as equally hard as a UK ETF Investment trust?"
Hi Jason,
I see what you're getting at and a year or two back I would have agreed with you. As it is, I'm now very much of the view that, broadly speaking, all instruments are equal and that it's purely personal preference based on knowledge and experience that draws us to one instrument in preference to another. I can't comment on either exotic FX or ETFs - as I've never traded either of them. However, I can give you a similar example that's resulted in my current thinking.
In 2008, when I day traded US equities, I found that there were stocks that I returned to time and again, among them were AAPL and POT. Relative to one another, AAPL was a mild and sedate stock with a tight spread of a few cents, whereas POT was a wild beast whose spread rarely dipped below 5 cents and was often nearer 10 or more. When I first saw POT, my first reaction was that I couldn't trade it. Anyway, to cut a long story short, I made good money on POT and was a net loser on AAPL. But conventional wisdom would say that of the two - at the time - AAPL was the 'easier' stock to trade and that POT was a total 'mare. By the same token, somewhere, there will be traders who think exotic FX pairs are 'easier' to trade than cable and other majors and that UK ETFs are 'difficult' to trade.
It must, surely, all come down to the P&L? If there was an instrument that enabled more people to make money than any other, then this would support the hypothesis that one instrument is 'easier' to trade than another. I've never heard of one. If you find one, please let me know and I'll switch straight away!
Tim.
Am I sure about what?You sure about this?