There are some interesting conspiracy theories coming up about SocGen and the unauthorised trades by Jerome Kieval.
There are two stories that I have heard.
CONSPIRACY THEORY 1: The Fed and the 75bps cut - did they know?
On Friday the Financial times implies that the timeline of events is as follows;
Fri 11
Jerome's unauthorised positions are noticed.
Sat 12/Sun 13
Jerome is interviewed by SocGen's management
Mon 14
SocGen unwinds the positions on the open market
Tue 15
The Fed Reserve cuts by 75bps.
Wed 16
The Banque de France contacts the US Fed and informs them of the SocGen Issue
Hello?!?!? Are we saying that the Fed were UNAWARE of the goings on at SocGen? A lot of people around me are speculating that the Fed knew exactly what was happening when they made this cut. What do you think?
CONSPIRACY THEORY 2: SocGen used Jerome as fall guy for subprime losses.
The FT states that SocGen took at €2bln subprime writedown while Jerome Kieval's loss was €4.9bln. Also SocGen seems to be taking the opportunity to raise money from this debacle.
The conspiracy I've heard is that Jerome didn't lose that much cash. The suggestion I've heard is that Jerome is taking the fall for the bank's mishandling of the subprime crisis, the losses have been manipulated and this is why SocGen have not taken criminal proceedings against him - since they will have to disclose too much of their internal procedures.
Thoughts anyone?
There are two stories that I have heard.
CONSPIRACY THEORY 1: The Fed and the 75bps cut - did they know?
On Friday the Financial times implies that the timeline of events is as follows;
Fri 11
Jerome's unauthorised positions are noticed.
Sat 12/Sun 13
Jerome is interviewed by SocGen's management
Mon 14
SocGen unwinds the positions on the open market
Tue 15
The Fed Reserve cuts by 75bps.
Wed 16
The Banque de France contacts the US Fed and informs them of the SocGen Issue
Hello?!?!? Are we saying that the Fed were UNAWARE of the goings on at SocGen? A lot of people around me are speculating that the Fed knew exactly what was happening when they made this cut. What do you think?
CONSPIRACY THEORY 2: SocGen used Jerome as fall guy for subprime losses.
The FT states that SocGen took at €2bln subprime writedown while Jerome Kieval's loss was €4.9bln. Also SocGen seems to be taking the opportunity to raise money from this debacle.
FT said:"SocGen will raise €5.5bln through an emergency rights issue... that will leave it's Tier One capital ratio hight than before at 8 per cent."
The conspiracy I've heard is that Jerome didn't lose that much cash. The suggestion I've heard is that Jerome is taking the fall for the bank's mishandling of the subprime crisis, the losses have been manipulated and this is why SocGen have not taken criminal proceedings against him - since they will have to disclose too much of their internal procedures.
Thoughts anyone?