ford said:
Neat trick..
I have one question. Both examples all co-incide with doji's on the bar where volume increases from the lull. I'm just wondering if this is crucial to the trick, as on my charts both of the instances the bars arent doji's, just 1 tick off.
So when you go through the decission making process and analyse what is on the screen does the doji play a major role in entering or not?
Thank you for the contributions
ford,
The way I've come to look at it, the doji is kind of important but not crucial, i.e. ditto. BTW.. don't know what charting package you are using, but if your bars are out you could try synchroning your pc clock via these atomic clock sites... might make a difference).
However (based entirely on another gem Skim mentioned yonks ago... which I hope she doesn't mind me repeating
) if you watched those two doji bars forming at the time in conjunction with the volume as it increased and you should have seen the volume increasing above where the doji eventually closed (1st example) and below the where the doji eventually closed (2nd example). In both cases there was significant volume (not huge mind you) without any dramatic movement in price. Somebody was sitting there on the offer (example 1) on the bid (second example) happily taking everything. Who is this more likely to be? Retail or the big boys? Not too hard to work out.....
Anyway, that's kind of by the by. As Skim says it's the set-up leading up to the doji/in-decision/volume pattern that's important rather than the doji itself.
Skim's example is a far better illustration in that respect. Again the point is.... prior to the BO of that hook at 1119.75 you have a fair idea that there will be stops above it. You know that depending on how many there are, it may cascade, and force people in at market. So, you want to get in before it breaks out, in anticipation of the breakout. Ideally, you would be trading multiple lots and when it breaks out you would get rid of some. Even with a single lot it's a trade that you would most likely be able to scratch if it didn't break out.
In the case of the first example, it's a lot messier. Why? Because there isn't a nice hook or break-out point far enough away from the low of the doji to take out. To me, that's why the bars down from that earlier doji overlap.
My thoughts at the time, were that the place I wanted to lighten up, i.e. the place where retail would be getting in, would be if the low of the doji was taken out. With this as number 1 target, entry had to be somewhere around the close of the doji. As I said in the previous post, that was OK because of the earlier congestion between 1123 and 1121.5 (which is what I always traded off anyway).
As I explained, that tip from Skim works for me because it provides a more or less immediate confirmation of the validity of one of the set-ups I use. More importantly, in the relatively short time I've been using it, after watching it for a good while, it gives early warning if somethings not quite right and allows me to get out with substantially less pain.
Bit long winded...
But you did ask...........