Recessions are on the Margin - John Mauldin talks re. job losses in the US...

  • Thread starter Black Swan
  • Start date
  • Watchers 1
B

Black Swan

and the long long road to recovery...Thought about his opinion on the USA unemployment problem today given it was NFP/BLS info day...particularly this eye watering point I've seen repeated elsewhere in different formats, this is a long term insoluble problem which the UK/EU is going to have to contain/deal with also;

"That means in the next five years we need more than 19 million jobs to get back to under 5% unemployment. That's almost 4 million jobs a year or more than 325,000 a month, each and every month. Or 27 million jobs to get back there in ten years, or almost 230,000 jobs a month each and every month. :-0


He's a good read John so it's worth subscribing to his newsletter, thoughts from the frontline, there's no fee just an e-mail addy..Can there be a jobless recovery? I don't reckon there can be but...

The Rough Road Back

There are roughly 14.5 million unemployed in the US, another 9.4 involuntary part-time workers, and 2.5 million marginally attached workers. The latter category is basically people who would take a job if they could find one but haven't looked in the past four weeks. Plus younger people who have gone back to school because they can't find a job.

For the part-time workers to get full-time jobs we need to create (guessing) at least 4-5 million full-time jobs to give them the hours they want. That is at least 11-12 million jobs we need to have to get back to the unemployment levels of 2007 (assuming that about 7.5 million jobs gets us to 5% unemployment).

Now, we need about 1.5 million jobs every year to cover new people coming into the labor force - or that is what history and economists tell us. I am not so sure that number is not itself history. What group of people has seen its unemployment level go down? People over 55! My generation is not retiring as planned and indeed is going back to work. Retirement is somewhere in the future in a world where stocks have gone nowhere for ten years and housing values have collapsed.

We may need more than 1.5 million jobs a year (125,000 a month) if Boomers aren't going to quit. But let's assume they do, for the sake of argument.

That means in the next five years we need more than 19 million jobs to get back to under 5% unemployment. That's almost 4 million jobs a year or more than 325,000 a month, each and every month. Or 27 million jobs to get back there in ten years, or almost 230,000 jobs a month each and every month.

No recessions allowed. No crisis can show up. And the economy needs to grow at 3.5% plus on average to really give us jobs. Below are the employment statistics for the last 20 years. Straight from the BLS web site into my Excel spreadsheet. Notice that with the exception of 1994 and the last quarters of 1997 and 1999, we had no consistent quarters of 300,000-plus jobs a month. Also note that the economy grew (if memory serves ) at 3.3% in the '90s and at 1.9% in the last decade. That marginal growth makes a big difference.

http://www.investorsinsight.com/blo.../2010/11/26/recessions-are-on-the-margin.aspx
 


I think John's newsletter on this was in November, today's numbers just spiked my memory. Always good to have a contrarian view versus the spin and guff from the usual suspect mainstream media sources, I always have a good look around ZH of an evening..:)

What's even more glaring is that if (the recovery is slightly slower) there needs to be 27ml jobs created over the next ten years..gulp..:eek:

At his arguably 'socialist' peak Clinton created the conditions to promote 2 mil a year job creation...can Obama (will he be allowed) to do the same? Impossible given that none of the bail out money reached main street, on his watch too...the fraud..:(
 
None of the projected or required growth is likely to occur. It's been apparent for some time that society such as ours in UK will fragment into those that have/want work & those that lack/reject work. We have already experienced this to a certain degree where "benefits culture" can become a way of life whether desired or not. Like the 1930s, those in good employment will do very nicely and as for the rest, well ............

Like it or not, desirable or not, those in work are going to bear an increasing burden to support the rest to an acceptable/unacceptable standard of life. Far-sighted thinkers in the 1950s at the start of the electronic and digital age forecast a life of leisure where computers would do all the work and allow the working class to put their feet up. I suppose that has now become true - they just omitted to tell us the downside.
 
I think John's newsletter on this was in November, today's numbers just spiked my memory. Always good to have a contrarian view versus the spin and guff from the usual suspect mainstream media sources, I always have a good look around ZH of an evening..:)

What's even more glaring is that if (the recovery is slightly slower) there needs to be 27ml jobs created over the next ten years..gulp..:eek:

At his arguably 'socialist' peak Clinton created the conditions to promote 2 mil a year job creation...can Obama (will he be allowed) to do the same? Impossible given that none of the bail out money reached main street, on his watch too...the fraud..:(

I find ZH very useful too and it features in my planning for the day especially when it comes to trade opportunites (frontrunning POMO's and effect on equities as an example).

Economically, the world is in a bad place and I agree, I don't think the public get it. They'll start to get it when inflation kicks in, interest rates go up, repossessions increase and drive house prices down, cost of living goes up in real terms, etc, etc.

We're ****ed for a decade I reckon.
 
Top