invest name

You could call it Timmy's left nut sack, either it does what it says on the box or it does not, the name will neither brake or make.

But, to keep in the spirit of your thread, i think names of ancient origin are quite fashionable, such as names from ancient Egypt or Greece or Celtic.

So to stand out from the crowd call it- The Dogsbollucks Investment firm. That might get a few clients, very marketable....
 
how about:

Phake profits
Taikitt & Scarper
Kissit, Allgood & Bye.
Know Investments
Shy Stert Ryse Itton.
 
I can't beleieve you actually come on here and ask that question and are seriously (as far as we can tell) contemplating trying to manage money. Dude, you're hilarious you know that?

By the way - your motto (try making a million dollars on a million trades, not makinga million dollars on one trade) would probably see you penalised by the regulators for 'churning' if you do end up managing money.

Just a thought. Devil's in the details mate, in the details..... ;)
 
TBH I really don't know why everyonerich is allowed to have his web site in his signature when that is against t2w rules - they'd probably ban me if I did that.
Nor do I understand why he is allowed to use the PM facility to ask for volunteers to be his fund managers !!!
Nor do I understand why he has not been banned for twice publishing a pdf of a terrorist explosives manual.
Richard
 
Mr. Charts said:
TBH I really don't know why everyonerich is allowed to have his web site in his signature when that is against t2w rules - they'd probably ban me if I did that.
Nor do I understand why he is allowed to use the PM facility to ask for volunteers to be his fund managers !!!
Nor do I understand why he has not been banned for twice publishing a pdf of a terrorist explosives manual.
Richard
Click to expand...

forget his other T2W 'crimes', the pdf is the interesting bit...got a link? :D
 
Mr. Charts said:
TBH I really don't know why everyonerich is allowed to have his web site in his signature when that is against t2w rules - they'd probably ban me if I did that.
Nor do I understand why he is allowed to use the PM facility to ask for volunteers to be his fund managers !!!
Nor do I understand why he has not been banned for twice publishing a pdf of a terrorist explosives manual.
Richard
Click to expand...

Hi Richard,
I didn't see the pdf of the terrorist explosives manual, but I assume those posts were deleted? Additionally, he may have been issued with infraction points and warned in no uncertain terms to curb such unacceptable behaviour. Regarding his other transgressions of site guidelines, I can only assume that the Mod's don't take him seriously. In the often arid world of trading, one needs a little entertainment and, to be fair, threads like this one do provide some good light hearted humour - mostly at the OP's expense. So, in answer to your question as to why he's not been banned, my understanding is that the members who breach site guidelines are as important as the breaches themselves, and each case is evaluated accordingly. However, I'm not a moderator, so - if you want a definitive answer in this particular case, I suggest you PM one of them.
Cheers,
Tim.
 
timsk said:
However, I'm not a moderator, so - if you want a definitive answer in this particular case, I suggest you PM one of them.
Click to expand...

I thought that this issue has already been dealt with and the official policy is some are more equal than others.

Its particularly sickening watching members of T2W management constantly misleading and changing policy on a whim. Is this a deliberate policy to cause confusion, because I see you and Trader 33 doing this stuff on an almost daily basis now.
 
zupcon said:
I thought that this issue has already been dealt with and the official policy is some are more equal than others.

Its particularly sickening watching members of T2W management constantly misleading and changing policy on a whim. Is this a deliberate policy to cause confusion, because I see you and Trader 33 doing this stuff on an almost daily basis now.
Click to expand...

Hi zupcon,
You'll have to give examples of precisely what you mean, especially by the comment "I see you and Trader 33 doing this stuff on an almost daily basis now", as I honestly haven't the faintest idea what on earth you're talking about!

I genuinely welcome your feedback as to what I could - or should - be doing to make T2W a better forum. That said, let's not disrupt the flow of witty suggestions for a name of 'everyonerich's' fund any further and, if you wish to pursue this matter, I would request that you open a thread (or add to an existing one) in the 'T2W Feedback' forum.

Cheers,
Tim.
 
zupcon said:
I thought that this issue has already been dealt with and the official policy is some are more equal than others.

Its particularly sickening watching members of T2W management constantly misleading and changing policy on a whim. Is this a deliberate policy to cause confusion, because I see you and Trader 33 doing this stuff on an almost daily basis now.
Click to expand...

With regards to myself please post clear examples of where I have changed policy or deliberately misled people as I am not in a position to do so in the first place ? And I do mean clear examples.


Paul
 
Last edited:
timsk said:
Hi Richard,
I didn't see the pdf of the terrorist explosives manual, but I assume those posts were deleted? Additionally, he may have been issued with infraction points and warned in no uncertain terms to curb such unacceptable behaviour. Regarding his other transgressions of site guidelines, I can only assume that the Mod's don't take him seriously. In the often arid world of trading, one needs a little entertainment and, to be fair, threads like this one do provide some good light hearted humour - mostly at the OP's expense. So, in answer to your question as to why he's not been banned, my understanding is that the members who breach site guidelines are as important as the breaches themselves, and each case is evaluated accordingly. However, I'm not a moderator, so - if you want a definitive answer in this particular case, I suggest you PM one of them.
Cheers,
Tim.
Click to expand...





Hi Tim,
I take on board all your well made points, especially about humour and mod discretion and I do agree with them. Thanks for the different perspective.
I just think everyonerich having now had the link in his opening post removed has added the site name in an image in his latest post to take the mickey out of the mods; not to mention including it in a post on another thread. Ah well, he must be desperate - unsurprisingly.
Anyway, not my battle.
It might be an idea for staff members to have mod powers as that link in the OP remained in place for several hours, not that anyone this side of the Andromeda galaxy would place money with the OP anyway :)

To get back to the humour as you rightly suggest........

............Bernie Made Off Securities (incorporated at Butner federal correctional facility in North Carolina - well it is secure there........)


Richard
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Potential good investment?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Hoggums
Hoggums
T
Dematerialisation of OTC stock certificates
Replies
0
Views
2K
ticker71
T
G
Trading Investment Capital
Replies
3
Views
2K
VeerTrade
V
B
Having a similiar business name with other companies..
Replies
3
Views
2K
Directional
Directional
R
SterlingPDI
2 3
Replies
43
Views
9K
KSL
K
Top