I really like your emphasis on anlayisng and understanding the structure of your winning trades.
So many traders place all their emphasis on their losers, as if they feel that if only they didn't have so many losers they would be a profitable trader. This is a fallacy, the win rate of a strategy is almost intrinsic to the strategy and very hard to significantly improve. Far more effective to improve the individual performance of winners than to convert losers into winners.
Hello Tomorton
Thanks for your kind comment. This last month I was teaching a class and could not reply. My obligation ended last Friday and
as a courtesy I wanted to add a followup
Item 1
I teach new hires at commercial firms. Also on occasion I am asked to try to help if traders are having difficulty and want to consider
possible alternatives. This is a very competitive profession and if one of those alternatives is to find a new job, traders are usually willing
to at least listen to what I have to say.
Item 2
I start by analyzing a sequence of trades. By "sequence" I mean at least a week (preferably a month). What I am looking for are patterns
Because of privacy considerations I won't go into details however the pattern I often see, is traders failing to see (and incorporate) the
broader context. Usually when readers see this, they assume I am talking about the impact of specific economic reports. I am not
The top 10 firms (banks & funds) that control the markets, have the ability to move the market whenever and wherever they want
Those that are publicly traded have the obligation to report on a quarterly basis, and if you look at their performance you will discover
that they almost never fail to report big profits. The bottom line is that skilled professionals know how to anticipate when the markets
are most likely to move and in which direction. In contrast, most amateurs have no clue or just guess based on what they read.
Item 3
When I see a sequence of trades that is "out of synch" with the broad market, I know that 1) this trader doesn't understand the full picture
and 2) that his "edge" (if he has one) isn't "stable". What he may have is known as a "seasonal" edge, that appears and disappears and that is why he
is having problems
Solutions
I don't want to know what the trader's system is. Couldn't care less. If what he does is inconsistent, what good is it really. Instead I ask one
simple question. On any single trade, what is your exit rule (what is the rationale)? AND then I substitute my own systematic approach using
one of several exit styles
We backtest the new exit and (what a surprise) the result is often (almost always) immediate improvement. Changing one thing
Once they see that initial improvement, we move on to the broader problem (how to "see the market").
I don't know you Tomorton, but I suggest you begin by looking into (googling) Chuck LeBeau's "Chandelier Exit" as a starting point.
If you find something in that search that works (and I am not teaching a class) perhaps we can talk about more about the big picture.
Good luck