There is a phenomenal well of expertise on this Board and so I am going to seek advice from our legal beavers or those who have gone along the same road before.
In short, I purchased a new car four weeks ago from a main Toyota Dealership. The car's gearbox is giving some concern in so far as the transmission from first into second is not at all smooth. There are, additionally, some squeaks and another clicking noise when acceleration and deceleration are effected!!
I took it back to be checked out and they didn't seem to be too concerned. "Oh that's just the model's gear box; it's a bit notchity" (their word, not mine!) They told me to seek a second opinion at another dealer; I did so. Two mechanics at dealership number 2 examined the car and test-drove it and are concerned that there may be a gear box fault and that it may require the gear box to be taken out and stripped!! To enable that, the engine has to be removed!!
I telephoned the dealership from whom the car was purchased and informed them that I wanted a refund or a replacement vehicle. They felt that was unreasonable and that they have offered to carry out repairs under the warranty. "After all," they said, "That's why you have been given the manufacturer's warranty."
But who wants to spend £18,000 on a brand new vehicle only to have to dip straight into the protection of the warranty for the purposes of allowing them to strip the gearbox. Am I within my rights insisting on a new vehicle or a refund? I have threatened to sue. Am I being unreasonable as suggested by the dealership from whom I purchased the vehicle in good faith?
Many thanks,
Sean
In short, I purchased a new car four weeks ago from a main Toyota Dealership. The car's gearbox is giving some concern in so far as the transmission from first into second is not at all smooth. There are, additionally, some squeaks and another clicking noise when acceleration and deceleration are effected!!
I took it back to be checked out and they didn't seem to be too concerned. "Oh that's just the model's gear box; it's a bit notchity" (their word, not mine!) They told me to seek a second opinion at another dealer; I did so. Two mechanics at dealership number 2 examined the car and test-drove it and are concerned that there may be a gear box fault and that it may require the gear box to be taken out and stripped!! To enable that, the engine has to be removed!!
I telephoned the dealership from whom the car was purchased and informed them that I wanted a refund or a replacement vehicle. They felt that was unreasonable and that they have offered to carry out repairs under the warranty. "After all," they said, "That's why you have been given the manufacturer's warranty."
But who wants to spend £18,000 on a brand new vehicle only to have to dip straight into the protection of the warranty for the purposes of allowing them to strip the gearbox. Am I within my rights insisting on a new vehicle or a refund? I have threatened to sue. Am I being unreasonable as suggested by the dealership from whom I purchased the vehicle in good faith?
Many thanks,
Sean