jthetrader
Active member
- Messages
- 221
- Likes
- 8
I really want to understand this in order to see how justified the compensation traders receive is. AFAIK at hedge funds it is simply an eat-what-you-kill affair, if you turn £1mn into £2mn you will get a piece of that £1mn in profit, regardless of the ups and downs of the market in general, regardless of how well you did last year etc
Again, I understand there to be a similar situation at prop trading firms, there is a split between the trader and the firm and so long as he is in the black at the end of the relevant period, be it monthly or quarterly or annual, they split the profit.
However I have heard that bank traders have to acheive a positive relative return, i.e. their performance is measured against some market index, e.g. if they are trading US equities and the S & P 500 has moved by 5% in the last year they are only compensated for the amount they beat the S & P 500 by. Yet I've also read comments on this forum, presumably written by those with a good understanding of this business, that the best traders work for banks not hedge funds because £ for £ you do better working for the former.
So. Any info would be helpful.
Again, I understand there to be a similar situation at prop trading firms, there is a split between the trader and the firm and so long as he is in the black at the end of the relevant period, be it monthly or quarterly or annual, they split the profit.
However I have heard that bank traders have to acheive a positive relative return, i.e. their performance is measured against some market index, e.g. if they are trading US equities and the S & P 500 has moved by 5% in the last year they are only compensated for the amount they beat the S & P 500 by. Yet I've also read comments on this forum, presumably written by those with a good understanding of this business, that the best traders work for banks not hedge funds because £ for £ you do better working for the former.
So. Any info would be helpful.