Highly unlikely in my view unless you have clearly documented dates, times and individual trades where you can prove you lost as a result of what they were doing and that you were not using a SB company to trade. It is unlikely that they were fixing trending markets and more likely that they were using huge size and small movmements to make profits on those movements.
Highly unlikely in my view unless you have clearly documented dates, times and individual trades where you can prove you lost as a result of what they were doing and that you were not using a SB company to trade. It is unlikely that they were fixing trending markets and more likely that they were using huge size and small movmements to make profits on those movements.
They could but you would still need to prove it and the movements are likely to have been so small that it is noise to most retail traders in my view. Banks look for small movements with large size, where-as a lot of retail traders are looking for larger movements. It will be interesting to see if any report comes out of exactly what they did and when.
Trader333 is right spread punters and retail FX traders don't have a case , you are not trading with these banks so based on what they should compensate you ? Impossible . And the rigging is most likely was around certain times "fixing" to take advantage of certain orders , that's not news not the first time we hear this . BTW that doesn't necessarily mean that the other side - of these banks - have lost money because of that rigging ...
I see Barclay's and a few other have been fined again over the rigging of FX markets.
I wonder if it would be possible for retail FX trades to join a class action against the banks and claim back all their trading losses in the FX ?