meanreversion
Senior member
- Messages
- 3,398
- Likes
- 538
Still not sure why you'd choose to trade, e.g. AUD/DKK, because I'm sure the bid/ask is much wider. The volatility of EUR/DKK is of no consequence, so trading EUR/AUD would be far more sensible.
Being long (or short, depends on what you think happens) DKK is a free (not quite, but, let's say, cheep) Eurogeddon option. And I mean mostly through EURDKK.
Still not sure why you'd choose to trade, e.g. AUD/DKK, because I'm sure the bid/ask is much wider. The volatility of EUR/DKK is of no consequence, so trading EUR/AUD would be far more sensible.
Yeah, except that there's smth special about DKK. Specifically, in normal times DKK is pegged to the EUR, so, basically, the cross doesn't move, until, one day, it might just decide to move.ok, so when something is so heavily dependent on one particular event, you can treat it like an option on that event occuring, even though what you are buying is not an option?
like, could I say for example, there is optionality in a pharma stock because of an FDA approval?
unless, say, you had just trawled through a list of crosses as long as your arm, only paying attention to whether there was a candlestick pattern near an imaginary line on the graph, without actually understanding anything about it :whistling
Yeah, except that there's smth special about DKK. Specifically, in normal times DKK is pegged to the EUR, so, basically, the cross doesn't move, until, one day, it might just decide to move.
That doesn't happen, shurely
Yeah, precisely... To me "optionality" is a sort of a nebulous concept that is defined by a possibility of a price moving quickly and very sharply (relative to the normal state of affairs) under some special circumstances. At the same time, in normal circumstances, price should be expected to move very little. In that case, having this trade on feels like being long an option, 'cause it has a similar payoff. So being short subprime housing in 2008 had all sorts of optionality, etc etc.so for something to have any meaningful "optionality", the optionality part needs to be a significant enough part of the price to make it worthwhile?
so, like, the spoos has optionality on payrools, but also optionality on a thousand other things too, which means there isn't really any tangible optionality in it at all?
Yeah, precisely... To me "optionality" is a sort of a nebulous concept that is defined by a possibility of a price moving quickly and very sharply (relative to the normal state of affairs) under some special circumstances. At the same time, in normal circumstances, price should be expected to move very little. In that case, having this trade on feels like being long an option, 'cause it has a similar payoff. So being short subprime housing in 2008 had all sorts of optionality, etc etc.
Precisely... Not that I am a fan of Kyle Bass or anything, but he's definitely referring to that.like when kyle bass talks about assymmetric hedges? it's got an attractive "opionality" element to it if the payout is skewed more to the upside if you're right than the downside if your wrong?
That, my friend, is the perfect summation of optionality! (of course, you have to make sure that you're not exercising the "Crying Game" option, so to speak).well that is good to know, thanks for explaining. I've seen it banded about by folks more cleverer than me and never really understood what was meant by it.
I have a lot of optionality in my life, like when I talk to smoking ht chicks in bars. Upsides massively outweigh the downsides, but normally nothing happens :-/