Why was WASP banned?

oildaytrader · Nov 13, 2009

Only intelligent answers , nuthing daft.

He fought and ph****D too much with other members.

TheBramble · Nov 13, 2009

It is my understanding, though I didn't witness it directly, that he posted up child pornography.

oildaytrader · Nov 13, 2009

TheBramble said:
It is my understanding, though I didn't witness it directly, that he posted up child pornography.

Wasn't he admitted to a mental instituition?

donaldduke · Nov 13, 2009

oildaytrader said:
Wasn't he admitted to a mental instituition?

Yeah he joined up at CityBulls.

oildaytrader · Nov 13, 2009

donaldduke said:
Yeah he joined up at CityBulls.

Thats not a mental instituition.Maybe he needed help.

counter_violent · Nov 13, 2009

oildaytrader said:
Thats not a mental instituition.Maybe he needed help.

It's the nearest thing to One online

oildaytrader · Nov 13, 2009

counter_violent said:
It's the nearest thing to One online

The online ones only use sex in the mind therapy as a cure.

megamuel · Nov 14, 2009

I thought he got let back after he was banned for posting up the "Child Porn". I never saw the pictures in question thankfully but some other members defended him saying that it wasn't really child porn. Anyway once he was let back it then unfolded that he'd been running a fund and scammed some people out of their money. Not sure of the truth, well, I know he ran the fund but I don't know if anyone was actually scammed?

TheBramble · Nov 14, 2009

He was re-banned when admin decided he shouldn't have been un-banned in the first place. Whether they were correct in the first instance, but not the second; or the second, but not the first; or neither; or both - I don't believe there were any 'additional' issues leading to his final (or most recent, depending on your expectations) banning.

oildaytrader · Nov 14, 2009

TheBramble said:
He was re-banned when admin decided he shouldn't have been un-banned in the first place. Whether they were correct in the first instance, but not the second; or the second, but not the first; or neither; or both - I don't believe there were any 'additional' issues leading to his final (or most recent, depending on your expectations) banning.

So the admin did a heads or tails? or did they do heads you lose , tails we win and chucked him out?

Mayfly · Nov 14, 2009

The Bramble wrote:

He was re-banned when admin decided he shouldn't have been un-banned in the first place. Whether they were correct in the first instance, but not the second; or the second, but not the first; or neither; or both - I don't believe there were any 'additional' issues leading to his final (or most recent, depending on your expectations) banning.

RAOFLMAO! :cheesy:

Thus Speake the voice of experience? Priceless?

Cheers

Mayfly

PS: So, it seems you're back then,Tony?

oildaytrader · Nov 14, 2009

megamuel said:
. Not sure of the truth, well, I know he ran the fund but I don't know if anyone was actually scammed?

Maybe the admin caught up with his lady luck ,maybe he just liked porn in the mind on the internet.If not he was planning a sting ,but if he wasn't then he was getting banned,maybe that was cause he was planning a sting.

GammaJammer · Nov 14, 2009

I'm sure he still drops in here from time to time. Multinicks are notoriously hard to police for the poor mods.

arabianights · Nov 14, 2009

For lulz historians: http://www.trade2win.com/boards/foyer/63676-bird-plane.html

Although one does get the sense he never left...

Why was WASP banned?

oildaytrader

Senior member

TheBramble

Legendary member

oildaytrader

Senior member

donaldduke

Experienced member

oildaytrader

Senior member

counter_violent

Legendary member

oildaytrader

Senior member

megamuel

Experienced member

TheBramble

Legendary member

oildaytrader

Senior member

Mayfly

Established member

oildaytrader

Senior member

GammaJammer

Guest Author

arabianights

Legendary member

Similar threads