I was reading Victor Niederhoffer's criticisms of trend following earlier - Negative Feedback and Trend Following, by Victor Niederhoffer : Daily Speculations.
Significantly, Niederhoffer has no good counter-argument to the idea that the success of trend followers over many decades is evidence that trend following works.
However, he does raise an interesting point about whether, when we think we see a trend, our brains are deceiving us, and we are in fact seeing a random collection of price bars which happen by chance to lead from Point A to Point B. In other words, the market is walking a random walk, and when we say things like 'the bulls are getting really excited' or 'the market is soaring now that it's broken through resistance', we are being deceived by randomness.
Personally, I think trend following does work, and will continue to do so until such time as investors psychology changes (ie forever). However, he may be right about people being fooled by randomness, as the simulated chart on this page attempts to demonstrate: Why I Am Not a Trend Follower.
Any thoughts?
Jeff
Significantly, Niederhoffer has no good counter-argument to the idea that the success of trend followers over many decades is evidence that trend following works.
However, he does raise an interesting point about whether, when we think we see a trend, our brains are deceiving us, and we are in fact seeing a random collection of price bars which happen by chance to lead from Point A to Point B. In other words, the market is walking a random walk, and when we say things like 'the bulls are getting really excited' or 'the market is soaring now that it's broken through resistance', we are being deceived by randomness.
Personally, I think trend following does work, and will continue to do so until such time as investors psychology changes (ie forever). However, he may be right about people being fooled by randomness, as the simulated chart on this page attempts to demonstrate: Why I Am Not a Trend Follower.
Any thoughts?
Jeff