Phylo
Legendary member
- Messages
- 5,089
- Likes
- 425
A non-partisan research post - London
---------------------------------------------------
The journalistic footage and reporting realistically brings home the grimness of the situation - of that grimness, it cannot be denied.
However - IMO - some of the 'executed actions and movements' in the critical drone zones smacks of dramatisation filler that doesn't quite add up (on a first view anyway - time permitting will return for a second view and second opinion. Perhaps a more favourable revised opinion, perhaps an option of less favourable critique)
Example - last, but not least (perhaps I missed something !)
A drone is detected and positively identified as big shit !
One would deem the optimum survival strategy would be to lay low, out of sight, out of mind, until big shit fecks off !
Not - jump in a car and race like hell halfway across the region down - straight as a arrow, mile upon mile - spiderweb highway as a moving 'sitting' duck with the first option of survival being to 'run like hell' and outrun the drones !!!
Unless, there was no drone threat and the 'run like hell' dash was staged dramatisations (of what actually 'can' and 'does' occur when there is strategic reason to be out and about in a vehicle running like hell as a moving 'sitting' duck)
Wherever, they are, the drones are always gathering, and its 'urgent' time to 'run like hell' to somewhere else
Why the feck be out and about site seeing in the first place, if it is so dangerous !
IMO - while, no doubt, real dangers exist and are ever present, the journalist footage and reporting comes across as staged.
Nevertheless, credit where credit due .....some balls required....without doubt, a surprised incident could go down any instant ...
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
The journalistic footage and reporting realistically brings home the grimness of the situation - of that grimness, it cannot be denied.
However - IMO - some of the 'executed actions and movements' in the critical drone zones smacks of dramatisation filler that doesn't quite add up (on a first view anyway - time permitting will return for a second view and second opinion. Perhaps a more favourable revised opinion, perhaps an option of less favourable critique)
Example - last, but not least (perhaps I missed something !)
A drone is detected and positively identified as big shit !
One would deem the optimum survival strategy would be to lay low, out of sight, out of mind, until big shit fecks off !
Not - jump in a car and race like hell halfway across the region down - straight as a arrow, mile upon mile - spiderweb highway as a moving 'sitting' duck with the first option of survival being to 'run like hell' and outrun the drones !!!
Unless, there was no drone threat and the 'run like hell' dash was staged dramatisations (of what actually 'can' and 'does' occur when there is strategic reason to be out and about in a vehicle running like hell as a moving 'sitting' duck)
Wherever, they are, the drones are always gathering, and its 'urgent' time to 'run like hell' to somewhere else
Why the feck be out and about site seeing in the first place, if it is so dangerous !
IMO - while, no doubt, real dangers exist and are ever present, the journalist footage and reporting comes across as staged.
Nevertheless, credit where credit due .....some balls required....without doubt, a surprised incident could go down any instant ...
---------------------------------------------------
Last edited:
