I know its just spam... and I know I should know better but...
Is it just me, or do other people get equally annoyed reading comments such as
"Murphy's Law dictates that the longer an intraday trade lingers in a never-never land between a profitable exit signal and the stop loss, then the more likely it is that the position will produce a loss"
Either this statement is true for a given set up, or it isnt, but either way, surely the author should be able to provide a more definative definition, i.e "research indicates that X% of all trades that linger in never never land for a period greater than Y produce an average loss of Z"
Discretionary traders have a love of trading, system traders have a love of money.
This article has been removed and was posted in error from archives. The article was not written by Joe Ross, rather a former staff member.
Is this you, or a paraphrase from somwhere else?
And as for 3 minutes?!... yeah yeah, whatever you say pal 😉
Hmm so whats the standing with time stops? This popped into my head...
Trade what you see, not whats on your wristwatch, but whats going on in the market. 👍
Yeah its 100% me Mr Gecko . I sat and thought about it ,as the question was asked in a thread here, I reached within for a definitive , so I could put it to bed, for myself I think. 👍