http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...ests/20050318/ts_latimes/anatomyofgiveandtake
Interesting food for thought ...
Interesting food for thought ...
dr_d_michaelson
Junior member
- Messages
- 23
- Likes
- 3
Well spotted.
Very badly written article. Almost as badly written as one would expect from the LA Times. To the point of providing unintended amusement in places. But extremely interesting content, as you say!!
Very badly written article. Almost as badly written as one would expect from the LA Times. To the point of providing unintended amusement in places. But extremely interesting content, as you say!!
SOCRATES
Veteren member
- Messages
- 4,966
- Likes
- 136
Agreed, there are some absolute corkers in there, if you sift with care and know what to look for, and, IF,
(which is the smallest word in the English Language but the one that means the most)
you find them, and are able to recognise them for what they are. (Giggle).
(which is the smallest word in the English Language but the one that means the most)
you find them, and are able to recognise them for what they are. (Giggle).
I think to all intents and purposes the answer must be no. There are certainly very rare people who can fool a lie detector, after extensive training, but those have been around for 50 years or more. Scanners are comparatively new and it's difficult to imagine that anyone can have learned how to do this (if indeed it's possible at all).alexander said:
