Right, this isn't really a statement or a comment or a question, it's just a ramble. Actually it's probably more like me sitting on the couch..
Ok, apart for some spread betting forays before, I just started to trade on a 10k self select isa. I've been reading up on trading for a couple of years now, and I know I need to take it live in some form to actually learn anything, so I decided to do it on my isa which as the cash is earning nothing, wtf, why not take a risk. At least I can turn any bad trades into long term investments and leave them run. Anyway, I've made a couple trades over the last 2-3 weeks
First went long loil, had a look at the charts, decided although it was high it had a bit left in it, went long, made 4-5% up until yesterday. Fair enough. Broker won't let me set stops for a dollar denominated fund even though it's traded on the ftse?!? i dunno, but anyway, watched it rally for a good few days now but today I had to go into college for the first time in a while and it tanked it while I was out. What do I learn from this? Don't trade anything your broker doesn't do stops on? Or make sure your watching all day while your in the market?
A few weeks ago HSBC was at about 563 trying 570 so set an order at 572.25. Thing is I made a limit order and not a stop limit order which is entirely my fault, and ended up going long @ 566. Ok it's my fault, but when I make the mistake of making a limit instead of a stop limit @ 572.25, when the underlying is @ 563 it should take place immediately, obviously they sat on it knowing full well they had something to play with until they filled it @566, 4minutes later. Anyway, I understand how broker's work so it's water under the bridge, anyway suffice to say hsbc never broke 570 and have continued all the way down to 510 and finished today @530. Anyway I'm in for the long haul, HSBC is the only bank with decent cash holdings compared to liabilities which is why i think it's the best of the bunch for an unavoidable appreciation in banks in the next 1-2years. Do fundamentals matter more then technicals when I'm considering longer timeframes? Does volatility matter in the grander scheme of thing ( as long as they don't go bust ) if i have 1x leverage?
Finally barclays. Took a gamble yesterday. Saw the fall, saw the reasons. My thoughts were an excess supply, this arab was already long billions, when his warrants convert he's gonna be long 2x as many billions, he doesn't want that kind of exposure, so he's just getting out and consolidating some profits. Anyway, thought it'd be a case of excess supply, lower price until it's mopped up; and when it is mopped up it'll again reach an equilibrium bar 1-2p. Again today I was away from my computer, but it droppped another 5%. Again I'm in for the long haul, it's an isa and i can wait until it comes back, even if it takes a year, i'm earning no interest on cash. BUT, if I was trading proper and not investing, is this a hint at technical being the bread and butter of trading?
I mean fundamentals are so subjective. Obviously there's something in me that wants to be that super trader that sits there thinking existing house sales + PCI => GDP => interest rate => exchange rate => £££ but then there must be traders that think the other way entirely, and who ends up right is right, and might not be next time. From what I feel at least, technicals are there, take them or leave them, it's subjective as far as you decide what your particular indicators are, but once you do it's almost surely objective and your in it for the long haul, does mixing in fundamentals increase the probabilities, or does it increase the volatilites?
And I don't like the look of that chair..
Ok, apart for some spread betting forays before, I just started to trade on a 10k self select isa. I've been reading up on trading for a couple of years now, and I know I need to take it live in some form to actually learn anything, so I decided to do it on my isa which as the cash is earning nothing, wtf, why not take a risk. At least I can turn any bad trades into long term investments and leave them run. Anyway, I've made a couple trades over the last 2-3 weeks
First went long loil, had a look at the charts, decided although it was high it had a bit left in it, went long, made 4-5% up until yesterday. Fair enough. Broker won't let me set stops for a dollar denominated fund even though it's traded on the ftse?!? i dunno, but anyway, watched it rally for a good few days now but today I had to go into college for the first time in a while and it tanked it while I was out. What do I learn from this? Don't trade anything your broker doesn't do stops on? Or make sure your watching all day while your in the market?
A few weeks ago HSBC was at about 563 trying 570 so set an order at 572.25. Thing is I made a limit order and not a stop limit order which is entirely my fault, and ended up going long @ 566. Ok it's my fault, but when I make the mistake of making a limit instead of a stop limit @ 572.25, when the underlying is @ 563 it should take place immediately, obviously they sat on it knowing full well they had something to play with until they filled it @566, 4minutes later. Anyway, I understand how broker's work so it's water under the bridge, anyway suffice to say hsbc never broke 570 and have continued all the way down to 510 and finished today @530. Anyway I'm in for the long haul, HSBC is the only bank with decent cash holdings compared to liabilities which is why i think it's the best of the bunch for an unavoidable appreciation in banks in the next 1-2years. Do fundamentals matter more then technicals when I'm considering longer timeframes? Does volatility matter in the grander scheme of thing ( as long as they don't go bust ) if i have 1x leverage?
Finally barclays. Took a gamble yesterday. Saw the fall, saw the reasons. My thoughts were an excess supply, this arab was already long billions, when his warrants convert he's gonna be long 2x as many billions, he doesn't want that kind of exposure, so he's just getting out and consolidating some profits. Anyway, thought it'd be a case of excess supply, lower price until it's mopped up; and when it is mopped up it'll again reach an equilibrium bar 1-2p. Again today I was away from my computer, but it droppped another 5%. Again I'm in for the long haul, it's an isa and i can wait until it comes back, even if it takes a year, i'm earning no interest on cash. BUT, if I was trading proper and not investing, is this a hint at technical being the bread and butter of trading?
I mean fundamentals are so subjective. Obviously there's something in me that wants to be that super trader that sits there thinking existing house sales + PCI => GDP => interest rate => exchange rate => £££ but then there must be traders that think the other way entirely, and who ends up right is right, and might not be next time. From what I feel at least, technicals are there, take them or leave them, it's subjective as far as you decide what your particular indicators are, but once you do it's almost surely objective and your in it for the long haul, does mixing in fundamentals increase the probabilities, or does it increase the volatilites?
And I don't like the look of that chair..